Rabeprazole in treatment of acid peptic diseases: results of three placebo-controlled dose-response clinical trials in duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The Rabeprazole Study Group.

Rabeprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor, was studied in patients with acid-peptic-related diseases (duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, GERD) in three placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials. Men and women over the age of 18 were enrolled if the presence of an active duodenal or gastric ulcer or erosive or ulcerative esophagitis was confirmed on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patients were randomly allocated to either placebo or rabeprazole 20 mg or 40 mg in the duodenal and gastric ulcer protocols or to placebo or rabeprazole 10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg in the GERD protocol. All doses of rabeprazole in all three studies were statistically significantly superior to placebo in healing acid-related lesions. There were no treatment differences between the rabeprazole doses in healing active peptic lesions. The incidence of positive [13C]urea breath test for H. pylori was 53% in patients with duodenal or gastric ulcers. H. pylori status was not effected by treatment with rabeprazole.

Nizatidine versus placebo in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a 12-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study.

Two doses of nizatidine (150 mg twice daily and 300 mg at bedtime), an H2-receptor antagonist, were compared with placebo in a 12-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel study in 466 patients with endoscopically documented gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Antacid tablets were given concomitantly as needed for pain. Compared with placebo, nizatidine 150 mg twice daily was highly effective in rapidly reducing the severity of heartburn, regardless of oesophagitis severity at entry. Significantly greater complete mucosal healing of oesophagitis occurred after 6 weeks of therapy with nizatidine 150 mg bid (vs nizatidine 300 mg at bedtime or placebo) only in patients with erosive oesophagitis [16/68 (24%) vs 8/65 (12%)] and erosive and ulcerative oesophagitis combined [21/99 (21%) vs 10/94 (11%)]. At week 12, healing with nizatidine 150 mg bid was also significantly greater than placebo in erosive [19/68 (28%) vs 9/65 (14%)], ulcerative [10/31 (32%) vs 3/29 (10%)], and erosive and ulcerative oesophagitis combined [29/99 (29%) vs 12/94 (13%)]. These results show that twice-daily therapy with nizatidine 150 mg is very effective at relieving heartburn, and can also heal erosive and ulcerative oesophagitis. Nizatidine 300 mg at bedtime was not effective at healing oesophagitis, compared with placebo.

Nizatidine versus placebo in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a 6-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind comparison. Nizatidine Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group.

In a randomised, multicentre trial, nizatidine 150 mg or 300 mg or placebo was administered twice daily for 6 weeks to 515 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Antacid tablets were taken as needed for pain. Significantly superior rates of endoscopically proven complete healing (normal-appearing mucosa) versus placebo occurred after 3 weeks with nizatidine 150 mg and after 6 weeks with nizatidine 300 mg. Six-week healing rates were 38.5% for nizatidine 300 mg, 41.1% for nizatidine 150 mg, and 25.8% for placebo. The nizatidine 150 mg treatment group had significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime heartburn severity after 1 day of therapy versus placebo. Twice-daily administration of nizatidine 150 mg or 300 mg provides prompt relief from the major symptom of GORD, heartburn, and complete healing of oesophagitis is seen in many patients.

Continuous infusions of nizatidine are safe and effective in the treatment of intensive care unit patients at risk for stress gastritis. The Nizatidine Intensive Care Unit Study Group.

This multicentre, randomized, parallel, double-blind study compared the safety and efficacy of nizatidine 20 and 10 mg/h with placebo. The objective was to maintain gastric pH > 4 in seriously ill patients at risk for stress gastritis. Gastric aspirate was obtained at 2-h intervals through a nasogastric tube after beginning study drug, and tested for pH and the presence of blood. Antacid doses (15 ml per dose) were individually adjusted and administered whenever the gastric pH was < 4. Significant gastrointestinal bleeding was assessed clinically by Hemmocult results, presence of frank bleeding from the GI tract, number of transfusions and vital signs. One hundred and twenty-six patients, 43 nizatidine 20 mg/h, 43 nizatidine 10 mg/h and 40 placebo were admitted to the study. For the treatment period, patients treated with either dose of nizatidine required significantly less antacid than placebo treated patients to maintain gastric acid pH > or = 4 (median total: 45 ml versus 180 ml, p < 0.001). Adverse clinical and laboratory events were similar or less frequent in the nizatidine groups compared with placebo. Nosocomial pneumonia occurred with very low frequency in all treatment groups.

Nizatidine prevents peptic ulceration in high-risk patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use is increasingly recognized as a major factor associated with peptic ulcer disease and complications. We undertook a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of nizatidine in preventing ulcer formation in patients with osteoarthritis who were taking NSAIDs. METHODS: After endoscopy to rule out the presence of an acute ulcer, 496 patients were randomized to receive nizatidine, 150 mg twice daily (248 patients) or placebo (248 patients) for 3 months. Repeated endoscopies were performed monthly. We defined failure as development of a peptic ulcer (> or = 0.3 cm in diameter). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics tested were comparable for the two groups with regard to age, sex, ulcer history, and Helicobacter pylori status. Overall ulcer occurrence in the nizatidine group (9.7%) was not significantly different from that in the placebo group (13.7%; P = .163). High-risk subgroups (patients with ulcer history and patients > or = 65 years of age), however, revealed statistically fewer ulcers for patients receiving nizatidine (P = .035 and P = .042, respectively). Analysis of antacid use showed significantly less use in nizatidine recipients, although there were similar percentages of patients showing improvement in dyspeptic symptoms in each treatment group. We failed to observe a conclusive correlation between H pylori status at baseline, as measured by serum immunoglobulin antibody, and development of an ulcer. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that nizatidine, 150 mg, twice daily, significantly reduces the incidence of ulcer formation in high-risk patients taking long-term NSAID therapy. It also relieves NSAID-associated dyspeptic symptoms in some patients.

Nizatidine versus placebo in active benign gastric ulcer disease: an eight-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison. The Nizatidine Benign Gastric Ulcer Disease Study Group.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if 150 mg nizatidine twice daily or 300 mg nizatidine at bedtime are similarly effective and to compare each dose with placebo in healing benign gastric ulcers and relieving peptic ulcer symptoms. METHODS: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel comparison. The study was conducted at 74 gastroenterology and internal medicine clinics in the United States and Canada. Four hundred fifty-six patients with active benign gastric ulcer documented by endoscopy participated in the study. On the basis of a computer-generated randomization list, patients were assigned sequentially to receive either 150 mg nizatidine twice daily (n = 151), 300 mg nizatidine once daily at bedtime and identically appearing placebo capsules in the morning (n = 153), or placebo capsules twice daily (n = 152). Treatment lasted for 8 weeks unless healing was documented by endoscopy after 4 weeks. Antacid tablets (aluminum hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide, simethicone combination) were supplied for relief of symptoms. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Both doses of nizatidine significantly improved healing rates at 8 weeks compared with placebo. Daytime and nighttime symptom severity was improved by both nizatidine regimens at end point (p less than 0.015 versus placebo, two-tailed test). Antacid use was similar for all groups in the end point analysis. Patient well-being was significantly better in patients treated with nizatidine than in patients in the placebo group ((p less than 0.04, two-tailed test). No clinically significant differences in the incidence of adverse clinical or laboratory events were noted. CONCLUSION: Nizatidine, 300 mg at bedtime and 150 mg twice daily, resulted in greater healing of benign gastric ulcers than placebo treatment after 8 weeks. Relief of the symptoms of gastric ulcer was significantly better in the patients receiving nizatidine treatment versus placebo treatment.

Nizatidine versus placebo in gastroesophageal reflux disease. A six-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison. Nizatidine Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group.

In a randomized, multicenter trial, nizatidine 150 mg or 300 mg, or placebo, was administered twice daily for six weeks to 515 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Gelusil antacid tablets were taken as needed for pain. Significantly superior rates of endoscopically proven complete healing (normal-appearing mucosa) versus placebo occurred after three weeks with nizatidine 150 mg, and after six weeks with nizatidine 300 mg. Six-week healing rates were 38.5% for nizatidine 300 mg, 41.1% for nizatidine 150 mg, and 25.8% for placebo. The nizatidine 150 mg treatment group had significantly greater improvement in daytime and nighttime heartburn severity after one day of therapy versus placebo. Twice-daily administration of nizatidine 150 mg or 300 mg provides prompt relief from the major symptom of GERD, heartburn, and complete healing of esophagitis is seen in many patients.

Nizatidine versus placebo in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.

Two doses of nizatidine (150 mg bid and 300 mg hs), an H2-receptor antagonist, were compared with placebo in a 12-wk, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel study in 466 patients with endoscopically documented gastroesophageal reflux disease. Antacid tablets were given concomitantly as needed for pain. Compared with placebo, nizatidine 150 mg twice daily was highly effective in rapidly reducing the severity of heartburn, regardless of esophagitis severity at entry. Significantly greater complete mucosal healing of esophagitis occurred after 6 wk of therapy with nizatidine 150 mg bid (vs. nizatidine 300 mg hs or placebo) only in patients with erosive esophagitis [16/68 (24%) vs. 8/65 (12%)] and erosive and ulcerative esophagitis combined [21/99 (21%) vs. 10/94 (11%)]. At wk 12, healing with nizatidine 150 mg bid was also significantly greater than placebo in erosive [19/68 (28%) vs. 9/65 (14%)], ulcerative [10/31 (32%) vs. 3/29 (10%)], and erosive and ulcerative esophagitis combined [29/99 (29%) vs. 12/94 (13%)]. These results show that twice-daily therapy with nizatidine 150 mg is very effective at relieving heartburn, and can also heal erosive and ulcerative esophagitis. Nizatidine 300 mg hs was not effective in healing esophagitis, compared with placebo.

A specific LTD4/LTE4-receptor antagonist improves pulmonary function in patients with mild, chronic asthma.

LY171883 is a new selective LTD4/LTE4-receptor antagonist. To evaluate the efficacy of LY171883, we studied 138 nonsmoking asthmatic patients, 18 to 65 yr old, in a double-blind, randomized block-design study. All patients were required to demonstrate a greater than or equal to 15% increase in FEV1 after inhaled bronchodilator use and were then randomly assigned to either LY171883 (600 mg) or placebo twice daily for 6 weeks. Assessment of efficacy was measured by inhaled metaproterenol use (mg/wk), symptoms, twice-daily peak expiratory flow, and weekly FEV1 measurements. LY171883-treated patients had improved FEV1 values upon completion of the treatment period compared with placebo recipients (p = 0.003). Metaproterenol use decreased in both groups, but treatment differences, though not statistically significant, favored LY171883 (p = 0.089). Of patients who used at least 23 mg/wk of metaproterenol (36 inhalations) at initiation of the study, those who received LY171883 used significantly less metaproterenol than those who received placebo (p = 0.007). LY171883 was well tolerated and reduced the need for a bronchodilator drug while improving pulmonary function. Results of this study support the hypothesis that leukotrienes LTD4 and/or LTE4 may be important in the pathogenesis of asthma in humans.

Healing and recurrence of active duodenal ulcer with nizatidine.

Nizatidine, a new H2-receptor antagonist for treatment of duodenal ulcer disease, was evaluated in a unique two-phase, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. Patients received either 150 mg nizatidine twice daily or placebo for 4 weeks (phase I). If ulcer healing did not occur during phase I, patients were randomly reallocated to receive either 150 mg nizatidine twice daily or placebo for an additional 4 weeks (phase II). Patients with a healed ulcer continued on the same therapy. All patients were endoscoped at week 8. Healing rates at week 2 were 93 of 265 (35%) nizatidine-treated patients and 55 of 260 (21%) placebo-treated patients (p less than 0.001); at week 4, healing rates were 198 of 259 (76%) nizatidine-treated patients and 95 of 243 (39%) placebo-treated patients (p less than 0.001). In phase II, ulcer healing occurred in 46 of 86 (53%) nizatidine-treated patients and in 23 of 90 (26%) placebo-treated patients (p = 0.002). In patients who had a healed ulcer at previous endoscopies, 18 of 178 (10%) nizatidine-treated patients and 10 of 81 (12%) placebo-treated patients had a recurrence of duodenal ulcer. Smokers who had histories of previous ulcers were more likely to have an early recurrence.

Comparison of nizatidine and cimetidine as once-nightly treatment of acute duodenal ulcer. Nizatidine Multicenter Duodenal Ulcer Study Group.

Nizatidine, a new H2-receptor antagonist for the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease, was compared with cimetidine in an 8-wk, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either nizatidine 300 mg h.s. or cimetidine 800 mg h.s. Patients were treated for 8 wk, regardless of the healing status of their ulcers. An endoscopy was performed at Wk 2, 4, and 8. Healing rates with nizatidine 300 mg h.s. were numerically, but not statistically significantly, superior to those with cimetidine 800 mg h.s. at each treatment period. Ulcer healing rates at Wk 2, 4, and 8 were 41% (78/191), 73% (130/179), and 81% (145/179) for nizatidine and 33% (60/184), 67% (116/174), and 75% (126/168) for cimetidine, respectively. Symptoms of peptic ulcer disease were similarly reduced at each treatment period by nizatidine and cimetidine. Patients with healed ulcers at either Wk 2 or Wk 4 were continued on therapy and an endoscopy was performed at Wk 8. Ulcer recurrence occurred in 10% of nizatidine-treated and 19% of cimetidine-treated patients at Wk 8 (p = 0.085). The observation of recurrence of duodenal ulcer while patients were receiving full-dose H2-receptor antagonist therapy has not been reported previously.

Safety of nizatidine in clinical trials conducted in the USA and Europe.

The safety of nizatidine as treatment for active duodenal or gastric ulcer disease or as maintenance therapy following ulcer healing was assessed in 3800 nizatidine-treated individuals in clinical trials conducted in the USA and Europe. Safety parameters included physical examinations, electrocardiograms, eye examinations, serum chemistries and testosterone, hematology, and urinalyses. Adverse events were recorded without judgment of causality. Early discontinuations and adverse events, including complications of active duodenal ulcer disease, occurred more frequently in placebo-treated patients than in those given nizatidine. No differences were observed between the nizatidine and ranitidine treatment groups in regard to adverse event incidence or severity. Minimal changes in uric acid values were observed during ranitidine and nizatidine therapy. Abnormal liver function tests occurred infrequently and to an equal extent in nizatidine and placebo treatment groups. No clinically relevant differences in laboratory test results were observed between treatment groups in studies conducted in Europe.

Treatment of duodenal ulceration in the United States.

Nizatidine, a new H2-receptor antagonist for the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease, was compared with placebo in a dose-response, double-blind, parallel, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either nizatidine (25 mg b.i.d., 150 mg b.i.d., or 300 mg at bedtime) or placebo. At the end of 4 weeks, patients whose ulcer had not healed were randomly reallocated to receive either the nizatidine 150 mg b.i.d. dosage regime or placebo for an additional 4 weeks. Nizatidine doses of 300 mg at bedtime and 150 mg b.i.d. demonstrated similar healing frequencies. Both of these doses were statistically significantly superior in ulcer healing to the nizatidine 25 mg b.i.d. dose and to placebo at the end of 4 weeks. Patients randomly reallocated to receive nizatidine had significantly greater healing rates than patients randomly reallocated to receive placebo. In summary, nizatidine given as a single evening dose of 300 mg or as 150 mg b.i.d. proved to be equally safe and effective in the healing of active duodenal ulcers.

Nizatidine as maintenance therapy of duodenal ulcer disease in remission.

A new H2-receptor antagonist, nizatidine (150 mg h.s.), was compared with placebo as maintenance therapy in a randomized, parallel, double-blind, one-year study of 513 patients with recently healed duodenal ulcer. Endoscopies were performed at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months and at unscheduled times if symptoms of active peptic ulcer disease were present. Cumulative ulcer recurrence rates for nizatidine and placebo were 13 versus 40% at 3 months, 24 versus 57% at 6 months, and 34 versus 64% at 12 months. The differences were significant (p less than 0.001) at each treatment period. Smokers in both treatment groups had significantly greater recurrence rates than non-smokers. Symptoms of peptic ulcer disease were significantly less in nizatidine-treated patients in the first 3 months of treatment. Adverse events, including those related to peptic ulcer disease, occurred more frequently in placebo-treated patients. Nizatidine proved to be safe and effective in preventing recurrences of duodenal ulcer.