Tachyphylaxis and reproducibility of desmopressin response in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A: implications for clinical practice.

Background: Desmopressin is frequently used perioperatively in persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. However, increase in factor (F)VIII:C after desmopressin use is interindividually highly variable. Tachyphylaxis has only been reported in test setting for persons with hemophilia A, with a remaining response of approximately 70% after a second dose compared with that after a first dose. Objectives: To study tachyphylaxis of FVIII:C response after multiple administration(s) of desmopressin in perioperative persons with nonsevere hemophilia A. Methods: We studied FVIII:C levels after desmopressin before (day 0 [D0]) and on days 1 (D1) and 2 (D2) after surgery in 26 patients of the DAVID and Little DAVID studies. We studied tachyphylaxis by comparing the responses at D1 and D2 with that at D0. We also assessed the reproducibility of the D0 response in comparison to an earlier performed desmopressin test. Results: The median absolute FVIII:C increase was 0.50 IU/mL (0.35-0.74; n = 23) at D0, 0.21 IU/mL (0.14-0.28; n = 17) at D1, and 0.23 IU/mL (0.16-0.30; n = 11) at D2. The median percentage of FVIII increase after the second administration (D1) compared with the first (D0) was 42.9% (29.2%-52.5%; n = 17) and that of the third (D2) compared with the first (D0) was 36.4% (23.7%-46.9%; n = 11). The FVIII:C desmopressin response at D0 was comparable with the desmopressin test response in 74% of the patients. Conclusion: Tachyphylaxis in the surgical setting was considerably more pronounced than previously reported, with FVIII:C at D1 and D2 of 36% to 43% of the initial response. Our results may have important implications for monitoring repeated desmopressin treatment when used perioperatively.

In silico evaluation of limited sampling strategies for individualized dosing of extended half-life factor IX concentrates in hemophilia B patients.

PURPOSE: Hemophilia B is a bleeding disorder, caused by a factor IX (FIX) deficiency. Recently, FIX concentrates with extended half-life (EHL) have become available. Prophylactic dosing of EHL-FIX concentrates can be optimized by assessment of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. To determine these parameters, limited sampling strategies (LSSs) may be applied. The study aims to establish adequate LSSs for estimating individual PK parameters of EHL-FIX concentrates using in silico evaluation. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations were performed to obtain FIX activity versus time profiles using published population PK models for N9-GP (Refixia), rFIXFc (Alprolix), and rIX-FP (Idelvion). Fourteen LSSs, containing three or four samples taken within 8 days after administration, were formulated. Bayesian analysis was applied to obtain estimates for clearance (CL), half-life (t1/2), time to 1% (Time1%), and calculated weekly dose (Dose1%). Bias and precision of these estimates were assessed to determine which LSS was adequate. RESULTS: For all PK parameters of N9-GP, rFIXFc and rIX-FP bias was generally acceptable (range: -5% to 5%). For N9-GP, precision of all parameters for all LSSs was acceptable (< 25%). For rFIXFc, precision was acceptable for CL and Time1%, except for t1/2 (range: 27.1% to 44.7%) and Dose1% (range: 12% to 29.4%). For rIX-FP, all LSSs showed acceptable bias and precision, except for Dose1% using LSS with the last sample taken on day 3 (LSS 6 and 10). CONCLUSION: Best performing LSSs were LSS with samples taken at days 1, 5, 7, and 8 (N9-GP and rFIXFc) and at days 1, 4, 6, and 8 (rIX-FP), respectively.

Major differences in clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of men and women with autosomal inherited bleeding disorders.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, more awareness is raised about sex-specific dilemmas in inherited bleeding disorders. However, no large studies have been performed to assess differences in diagnosis, bleeding phenotype and management of men and women with bleeding disorders. Therefore, we investigated sex differences in a large cohort of well-defined patients with autosomal inherited bleeding disorders (von Willebrand disease (VWD), rare bleeding disorders (RBDs) and congenital platelet defects (CPDs)). METHODS: We included patients from three nationwide cross-sectional studies on VWD, RBDs and CPDs in the Netherlands, respectively the WiN, RBiN and TiN study. In all studies a bleeding score (BS) was obtained, and patients filled in an extensive questionnaire on the management and burden of their disorder. FINDINGS: We included 1092 patients (834 VWD; 196 RBD; 62 CPD), of whom 665 (60.9%) were women. Women were more often referred because of a bleeding diathesis than men (47.9% vs 36.6%, p = 0.002). Age of first bleeding was similar between men and women, respectively 8.9 ± 13.6 (mean ±sd) years and 10.6 ± 11.3 years (p = 0.075). However, the diagnostic delay, which was defined as time from first bleeding to diagnosis, was longer in women (11.6 ± 16.4 years) than men (7.7 ± 16.6 years, p = 0.002). Similar results were found when patients referred for bleeding were analyzed separately. Of women aging 12 years or older, 469 (77.1%) had received treatment because of sex-specific bleeding. INTERPRETATION: Women with autosomal inherited bleeding disorders are more often referred for bleeding, have a longer diagnostic delay, and often require treatment because of sex-specific bleeding. FUNDING: The WiN study was supported (in part) by research funding from the Dutch Hemophilia Foundation (Stichting Haemophilia), Shire (Takeda), and CSL Behring (unrestricted grant).

Sickle cell disease: Clinical presentation and management of a global health challenge.

Sickle cell disease is an autosomal recessive, multisystem disorder, characterised by chronic haemolytic anaemia, painful episodes of vaso-occlusion, progressive organ failure and a reduced life expectancy. Sickle cell disease is the most common monogenetic disease, with millions affected worldwide. In well-resourced countries, comprehensive care programs have increased life expectancy of sickle cell disease patients, with almost all infants surviving into adulthood. Therapeutic options for sickle cell disease patients are however, still scarce. Predictors of sickle cell disease severity and a better understanding of pathophysiology and (epi)genetic modifiers are warranted and could lead to more precise management and treatment. This review provides an extensive summary of the pathophysiology and management of sickle cell disease and encompasses the characteristics, complications and current and future treatment options of the disease.

Population pharmacokinetics of factor IX in hemophilia B patients undergoing surgery.

Essentials Factor IX (FIX) dosing using body weight frequently results in under and overdosing during surgery. We aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model describing the perioperative FIX levels. Population PK parameter values for clearance and V1 were 284 mL h-170 kg-1 and 5450 mL70 kg-1. Perioperative PK parameters differ from those during non-surgical prophylactic treatment. SUMMARY: Background Hemophilia B is a bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency of coagulation factor IX (FIX). In the perioperative setting, patients receive FIX concentrates to ensure hemostasis. Although FIX is usually dosed according to bodyweight, under- and overdosing occurs frequently during surgery. Aim The objective was to quantify and explain the interpatient variability of perioperatively administered plasma-derived (pd) and recombinant (r) FIX concentrates. Methods Data were collected from 118 patients (median age, 40 years [range, 0.2-90]; weight, 79 kg [range, 5.3-132]) with moderate (28%) or severe hemophilia B (72%), undergoing 255 surgical procedures. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling in NONMEM. Results Measured perioperative FIX level vs. time profiles were adequately described using a three-compartment PK model. For a typical 34-year-old patient receiving rFIX, clearance (CL), intercompartmental clearance (Q2, Q3), distribution volume of the central compartment (V1) and peripheral compartments (V2, V3) plus interpatient variability (%CV) were: CL, 284 mL h-170 kg-1 (18%); V1, 5450 mL70 kg-1 (19%); Q2, 110 mL h-170 kg-1; V2, 4800 mL70 kg-1; Q3, 1610 mL h-170 kg-1; V3, 2040 mL70 kg-1. From 0.2 years, CL and V1 decreased 0.89% and 1.15% per year, respectively, until the age of 34 years. Patients receiving pdFIX exhibited a lower CL (11%) and V1 (17%) than patients receiving rFIX. Interpatient variability was successfully quantified and explained. Conclusions The estimated perioperative PK parameters of both pdFIX and rFIX are different from those reported for prophylactic treatment. The developed model may be used to apply PK-guided dosing of FIX concentrates during surgery.

Clinically relevant differences between assays for von Willebrand factor activity.

Essentials It is unclear whether there are differences between von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity assays. We compared the four most used VWF activity assays in 661 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients. All assays correlated excellently, but a discrepant classification was seen in 20% of patients. Differences between VWF activity assays have a large impact on the classification of VWD. SUMMARY: Background Measuring the ability of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to bind to platelets is crucial for the diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Several assays that measure this VWF activity using different principles are available, but the clinical relevance of different assay principles is unclear. Objective To compare the four most widely used VWF activity assays in a large VWD patient population. Methods We measured VWF:RCo (ristocetin to activate VWF + whole platelets), VWF:GPIbR (ristocetin + platelet glycoprotein Ib receptor [GPIb] fragments), VWF:GPIbM (gain-of-function GPIb fragments that bind VWF spontaneously without ristocetin) and VWF:Ab (monoclonal antibody directed against the GPIb binding epitope of VWF to mimic platelets) in 661 VWD patients from the nationwide 'Willebrand in the Netherlands' (WiN) Study. Results All assays correlated excellently (Pearson r > 0.9), but discrepant results led to a different classification for up to one-fifth of VWD patients. VWF:RCo was not sensitive enough to classify 18% of patients and misclassified half of genotypic 2B VWD patients, especially those with p.Arg1306Trp. VWF:GPIbR was more sensitive, accurately classified the vast majority of patients, and was unaffected by the p.Asp1472His variant that causes artificially low VWF:RCo. VWF:GPIbM was the most precise assay but misclassified over a quarter of genotypic 2A, 2B and 3 patients. VWF:Ab, often not considered an actual VWF activity assay, performed at least equally to the other assays with regard to accurate VWD classification. Conclusion Although the different VWF activity assays are often considered similar, differences between assays have a large impact on the classification of VWD.

Pharmacokinetics and the transition to extended half-life factor concentrates: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Extended half-life proteins (EHL) are increasingly used in clinical practice, but there is no standardized approach to sampling, interpretation and implementation of pharmacokinetics (PK) data to maximize treatment benefit. The goal of EHL treatment is to attain a trough level sufficient to protect against spontaneous bleeds and reduce infusion frequency and limitations on individual activity and lifestyle. Performing classical PK assessments requires multiple blood samples, which is burdensome for patients and providers. Herein we review a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) approach to estimate individual PK parameters to transition patients from standard half-life (SHL) to EHL concentrates. We propose that a minimum of two to four post-infusion samples is sufficient to estimate individual PK profiles, with sufficient certainty to maintain factor levels above 1% and achieve bleed-free lifestyles. We also survey current PK use in patients transitioning to EHL, review key PK parameters and popPK models, and recommend an approach to using PK in patients initiating or switching to EHL.

Perioperative replacement therapy in haemophilia B: An appeal to "B" more precise.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia B is caused by a deficiency of coagulation factor IX (FIX) and characterized by bleeding in muscles and joints. In the perioperative setting, patients are treated with FIX replacement therapy to secure haemostasis. Targeting of specified FIX levels is challenging and requires frequent monitoring and adjustment of therapy. AIM: To evaluate perioperative management in haemophilia B, including monitoring of FIX infusions and observed FIX levels, whereby predictors of low and high FIX levels were assessed. METHODS: In this international multicentre study, haemophilia B patients with FIX < 0.05 IU mL-1 undergoing elective, minor or major surgical procedures between 2000 and 2015 were included. Data were collected on patient, surgical and treatment characteristics. Observed FIX levels were compared to target levels as recommended by guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 255 surgical procedures were performed in 118 patients (median age 40 years, median body weight 79 kg). Sixty percent of FIX levels within 24 hours of surgery were below target with a median difference of 0.22 IU mL-1 [IQR 0.12-0.36]; while >6 days after surgery, 59% of FIX levels were above target with a median difference of 0.19 IU mL-1 [IQR 0.10-0.39]. Clinically relevant bleeding complications (necessity of a second surgical intervention or red blood cell transfusion) occurred in 7 procedures (2.7%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that targeting of FIX levels in the perioperative setting is complex and suboptimal, but although this bleeding is minimal. Alternative dosing strategies taking patient and surgical characteristics as well as pharmacokinetic principles into account may help to optimize and individualize treatment.

Fifth Åland Island conference on von Willebrand disease.

The fifth Åland Island meeting on von Willebrand disease (VWD) was held on the Åland Islands, Finland, from 22 to 24 September 2016-90 years after the first case of VWD was diagnosed in a patient from the Åland Islands in 1926. This meeting brought together experts in the field of VWD to share knowledge and expertise on current trends and challenges in VWD. Topics included the storage and release of von Willebrand factor (VWF), epidemiology and diagnostics in VWD, treatment of VWD, angiogenesis and VWF inhibitors.

Cross-evaluation of Pharmacokinetic-Guided Dosing Tools for Factor VIII.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe and moderate haemophilia A are treated prophylactically with factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate. Individualization of prophylaxis can be achieved by pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing. AIM: In this study, the performance of three PK tools (myPKFiT, Web-Accessible Population Pharmacokinetic Service-Hemophilia [WAPPS] and NONMEM) is compared. METHODS: In 39 patients, with severe or moderate haemophilia A, blood samples were collected 4, 24 and 48 hours after administration of 50 IU kg-1 of recombinant FVIII (Advate [n = 30] or Kogenate [n = 9]). FVIII dose, FVIII activity and patient characteristics were entered into the three PK tools. Obtained PK parameters and dosing advises were compared. RESULTS: myPKFiT provided PK parameters for 24 of 30 patients receiving Advate, whereas WAPPS and NONMEM provided estimates for all patients. Half-life was different among the three methods: medians were 12.6 hours (n = 24), 11.2 hours (n = 30) and 13.0 hours (n = 30) for myPKFiT, WAPPS and NONMEM (p < 0.001), respectively. To maintain a FVIII trough level of 0.01 IU mL-1 after 48 hours, doses for myPKFiT and NONMEM were 15.1 and 11.0 IU kg-1 (p < 0.01, n = 11) and for WAPPS and NONMEM were 9.0 and 8.0 IU kg-1 (p < 0.01, n = 23), respectively. In nine patients receiving Kogenate, WAPPS and NONMEM produced different PK-parameter estimates; half-life was 15.0 and 12.3 hours and time to 0.05 IU mL-1 was 69.2 and 60.8 hours, respectively (p < 0.01, n = 9). However, recommended doses to obtain these levels were not different. CONCLUSION: The three evaluated PK tools produced different PK parameters and doses for recombinant FVIII. Haematologists should be aware that recommended doses may be influenced by the choice of PK tool.

Analysis of current perioperative management with Haemate® P/Humate P® in von Willebrand disease: Identifying the need for personalized treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Von Willebrand disease (VWD) are regularly treated with VWF-containing concentrates in case of acute bleeding, trauma and dental or surgical procedures. AIM: In this multicentre retrospective study, current perioperative management with a von Willebrand factor (VWF)/Factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate (Haemate® P) in patients with VWD was evaluated. PATIENTS/METHODS: Patients with VWD undergoing minor or major surgery between 2000 and 2015, requiring treatment with a VWF/FVIII concentrate (Haemate® P), were included. Achieved VWF activity (VWF:Act) and FVIII during FVIII-based treatment regimens were compared to predefined target levels in national guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 103 patients with VWD (148 surgeries) were included: 54 type 1 (73 surgeries), 43 type 2 (67 surgeries) and 6 type 3 (8 surgeries). Overall, treatment resulted in high VWF:Act and FVIII levels, defined as ≥0.20 IU/mL above predefined levels. In patients with type 1 VWD, respectively, 65% and 91% of trough VWF:Act and FVIII levels were higher than target levels. In patients with type 2 and type 3 VWD, respectively, 53% and 57% of trough VWF:Act and 72% and 73% of trough FVIII levels were higher than target level. Furthermore, FVIII accumulation over time was observed, while VWF:Act showed a declining trend, leading to significantly higher levels of FVIII than VWF:Act. CONCLUSION: High VWF:Act and accumulation of FVIII were observed after perioperative FVIII-based replacement therapy in patients with VWD, both underlining the necessity of personalization of dosing regimens to optimize perioperative treatment.

Setting the stage for individualized therapy in hemophilia: What role can pharmacokinetics play?

Replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates (CFC) is the mainstay of treatment in hemophilia. Its widespread application has led to a dramatic decrease in morbidity and mortality in patients, with concomitant improvement of quality of life. However, dosing is challenging and costs are high. This review discusses benefits and limitations of pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided dosing of replacement therapy as an alternative for current dosing regimens. Dosing of CFC is now primarily based on body weight and based on its in vivo recovery (IVR). Benefits of PK-guided dosing include individualization of treatment with better targeting, more flexible blood sampling, increased insight into association of coagulation factor levels and bleeding, and potential overall lowering of overall costs. Limitations include a slight burden for the patient, and availability of closely collaborating, experienced clinical pharmacologists.

In silico evaluation of limited blood sampling strategies for individualized recombinant factor IX prophylaxis in hemophilia B patients.

Essentials Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters can be obtained by limited sampling strategies (LSSs). Following 100 IU kg-1 rFIX, LSSs with 1 to 3 samples were evaluated in 5000 simulated subjects. For all LSSs, estimated individual PK parameters showed acceptable bias and precision. One sample between 10 min-3 h and two between 48 h-56 h showed best predictive performance. SUMMARY: Background Patients with severe hemophilia B regularly administer prophylactic intravenous doses of clotting factor IX concentrate to maintain a trough level of at least 0.01 IU mL-1 in order to prevent joint bleeds. Assessment of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters allows individualization of the recombinant factor IX (rFIX) dose. Aim To evaluate the predictive performance of limited sampling strategies (LSSs) with one to three samples to estimate individual PK parameters of rFIX. Methods Monte Carlo simulations were performed to obtain 5000 concentration-time profiles by the use of population PK parameters for rFIX from literature. Eleven LSSs were developed with one, two or three samples taken within an 80-h interval following administration of 100 IU kg-1 rFIX. Clearance (CL), half-life (t1/2 ), time to 1% and steady-state distribution volume (Vss ) were estimated for each simulated individual by the use of Bayesian analysis. Results For each LSS, average bias was small for CL (range - 1.5% to 1.4%), t1/2 (range - 4.5% to - 0.7%), time to 1% (range - 2.9% to 0%), and Vss (range - 3.7% to 0.3%). Imprecision for these parameters ranged from 6.4% to 11.9%, from 10.3% to 15.6%, from 7.3% to 10.9%, and from 9% to 20.1%, respectively. The best predictive performance was achieved with one sample taken between 10 min and 3 h and two samples taken between 48 h and 56 h after administration of rFIX. Conclusions This study demonstrates that limited sampling strategies, used for individualized dosing of rFIX in hemophilia B patients, can be developed and evaluated by in silico simulation.

Desmopressin in haemophilia: The need for a standardised clinical response and individualised test regimen.

INTRODUCTION: Due to interindividual variation in desmopressin response, non-severe haemophilia A patients require desmopressin testing prior to therapeutic treatment. However, adequate response or frequency of blood sampling is not standardised in international guidelines. Consequently, various definitions and blood sampling protocols are currently applied. Interestingly, sustainability of desmopressin response is not incorporated into these definitions. AIM: To study desmopressin response rates in a cohort of non-severe haemophilia A patients using currently accepted desmopressin response definitions. This, in order to formulate a standardised, uniform response which includes information on sustainability and to design a standardised blood sampling protocol. METHODS: Currently used desmopressin responses in non-severe haemophilia A patients were derived from a literature search. Actual desmopressin response rates were individualised in 105 non-severe HA patients from the Erasmus University Medical Centre and classified according to current varying definitions. RESULTS: Five response definitions were evaluated, three of which included only factor VIII (FVIII):C cut-off levels and two also incorporated FVIII:C-fold increase over baseline. FVIII: C-fold increase showed no association with desmopressin response sustainability. FVIII: C 1 hour after infusion (<0.30, ≥0.30-0.49, ≥0.50-0.79 and ≥0.80 IU/mL) was, however, indicative of desmopressin response after 6 hours. CONCLUSION: We suggest standardised desmopressin response based on clinically relevant FVIII:C levels, e.g. 0.30 and 0.50 IU/mL. In addition, patients with <0.30 IU/mL FVIII:C after 1 hour (non-responder) or ≥0.80 IU/mL (sustained responder) do not require subsequent blood sampling. However, patients with ≥0.30-0.79 IU/mL FVIII:C after 1 hour should undergo blood sampling after 6 hours to additionally determine response sustainability.

Optimization of home treatment in haemophilia: effects of transmural support by a haemophilia nurse on adherence and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Transmural support by a haemophilia nurse may improve treatment and may empower parents and patients. AIM: To measure the effect of structured home visits by a haemophilia nurse in (parents of) patient on aspects of prophylactic home treatment. METHODS: A multicentre intervention study in two paediatric haemophilia treatment centres was performed. Primary outcome measures were: adherence to prescribed treatment, health-related quality of life and behavioural scores. Secondary outcome measures were: total clotting factor consumption, self-efficacy and number of joint bleeds. RESULTS: Over a period of 22 months (median, IQR 21-23), four to seven home visits in 46 patients (mean age 9.4 ± 4.2 years) were made. No difference in adherence to prescribed treatment was seen after the home visits when compared to baseline measurements. Both the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) scales on 'Role functioning - Emotional/Behavioural' (P = 0.02, d = 0.53) and 'Parental Time Impact' (P = 0.04, d = 0.33) were reduced after intervention. The disease-specific Haemo-QoL questionnaire showed improvement in domains: 'Family' (P = 0.04, d = -0.14), 'Friends' (P = 0.03, d = -0.29) and 'Perceived support' (P = 0.03, d = -0.37). Significant improvement was observed with regard to domain 'Communication' of the VERITAS-Pro scale (P = 0.03, d = -0.28). CONCLUSIONS: After a period of transmural care by a haemophilia nurse, significant but small positive effects were demonstrated with regard to communication and increase of perceived support between parents and haemophilia treatment centre. No improvement was observed in other outcome measures.

In Vivo T1 of Blood Measurements in Children with Sickle Cell Disease Improve Cerebral Blood Flow Quantification from Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Children with sickle cell disease have low hematocrit and elevated CBF, the latter of which can be assessed with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. Quantitative CBF values are obtained by using an estimation of the longitudinal relaxation time of blood (T1blood). Because T1blood depends on hematocrit in healthy individuals, we investigated the importance of measuring T1blood in vivo with MR imaging versus calculating it from hematocrit or assuming an adult fixed value recommended by the literature, hypothesizing that measured T1blood would be the most suited for CBF quantification in children with sickle cell disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four approaches for T1blood estimation were investigated in 39 patients with sickle cell disease and subsequently used in the CBF quantification from arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. First, we used 1650 ms as recommended by the literature (T1blood-fixed); second, T1blood calculated from hematocrit measured in patients (T1blood-hematocrit); third, T1blood measured in vivo with a Look-Locker MR imaging sequence (T1blood-measured); and finally, a mean value from T1blood measured in this study in children with sickle cell disease (T1blood-sickle cell disease). Quantitative flow measurements acquired with phase-contrast MR imaging served as reference values for CBF. RESULTS: T1blood-measured (1818 ± 107 ms) was higher than the literature recommended value of 1650 ms, was significantly lower than T1blood-hematocrit (2058 ± 123 ms, P < .001), and, most interesting, did not correlate with hematocrit measurements. Use of either T1blood-measured or T1blood-sickle cell disease provided the best agreement on CBF between arterial-spin labeling and phase-contrast MR imaging reference values. CONCLUSIONS: This work advocates the use of patient-specific measured T1blood or a standardized value (1818 ms) in the quantification of CBF from arterial spin-labeling in children with SCD.