Teleconsultation Perceptions of Medical and Radiation Oncologists in the COVID-19 and Post-COVID-19 Era: A National Survey in the Philippines.

PURPOSE: The study reports on the current perception of medical and radiation oncologists regarding teleconsultation in the Philippines. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the adoption of telemedicine was not widespread. With movement restrictions imposed during the pandemic, physicians were compelled to use telemedicine. It is uncertain whether physicians will still adopt its use in practice in the post-COVID-19 era. This study gives insight into the possible adaptation of this mode of consultation in the future, especially in areas with limited health care resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a national survey among medical oncologists and radiation oncologists in the Philippines. A 43-item online survey was developed, validated, and administered to the oncologists. The demographics and data from categorical questions were reported as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 142 responses were gathered from 82 medical oncologists and 60 radiation oncologists. There was agreement among participants that, during the pandemic, teleconsultation could be used for the first visit, diagnostic workup request, treatment explanation, follow-up care, and chronic disease management. There was disagreement whether cancer diagnosis disclosure and cancer prognosis revelation could be performed via teleconsultation, and there was agreement that emergency consultation and physical examination would warrant a face-to-face consultation. After the COVID-19 pandemic, 78.7% intend to continue using teleconsultation except for emergency consultations, first visits, physical examination, diagnosis disclosure, and cancer prognosis revelation. CONCLUSION: Teleconsultation was perceived by oncologists as an acceptable method of providing cancer care during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Oncologists also intend to use teleconsultation in the post-COVID-19 era in certain aspects of patient care.

Clinicopathologic and Treatment Features of Long-Term Surviving Brain Metastasis Patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to characterize clinical features among brain metastasis (BM) patients who were long term survivors (LTS). METHODS: We reviewed a registry of BM patients referred to our multidisciplinary BM clinic between 2006 and 2014 and identified 97 who lived ≥ 3 years following BM diagnosis. The clinical and treatment characteristics were obtained from a prospectively maintained database, and additional information was obtained through review of electronic medical records and radiologic images. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow up for LTS was 67 months (range 36-181). Median age was 54 years, 65% had single BM, 39% had stable extracranial disease at the time of BM treatment, and brain was the first site of metastasis in 76%. Targetable mutations were present in 39% of patients and 66% received treatment with targeted-, hormonal-, or immuno-therapy. Brain surgery at the time of diagnosis was performed in 40% and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole brain radiotherapy (alone or combination) in 52% and 56%, respectively. Following initial BM treatment, 5-year intracranial disease-free survival was 39%, and the cumulative incidence of symptomatic radio-necrosis was 16%. Five and ten-year overall survival was 72% and 26%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Most LTS were younger than 60 years old and had a single BM. Many received treatment with surgery or targeted, immune, or hormonal therapy.

The Role of postoperative external beam radiotherapy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A Systematic review and meta-analysis.

The indications for external beam radiotherapy (RT) in differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTC) are still undefined. The objective of this study was to synthesize current evidence defining the role of postoperative RT in patients with DTC. A systematic review and meta-analysis were done. Included studies compared oncologic outcomes and toxicity of RT vs no RT in patients with DTC. Nine studies were included, two prospective and seven retrospective cohorts. RT improved 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival but not overall survival and distant metastasis failure-free survival. The locoregional control benefit was seen in patients at increased risk for recurrence, including those with advanced age, locoregionally advanced disease, gross or microscopic residual tumor, and structural invasion. Serious RT-related acute and late toxicities were rare. Available evidence suggests that postoperative RT can improve locoregional control in high-risk DTC with acceptable toxicity. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Hyperbaric Oxygen for Radiation Necrosis of the Brain.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) shows promising results in treating radionecrosis (RN) but there is limited evidence for its use in brain RN. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of using HBOT for symptomatic brain RN at a single institution. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients with symptomatic brain RN between 2008 and 2018 and was treated with HBOT. Demographic data, steroid use, clinical response, radiologic response and toxicities were collected. The index time for analysis was the first day of HBOT. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement of a presenting symptom, including steroid dose reduction. RESULTS: Thirteen patients who received HBOT for symptomatic RN were included. The median time from last brain radiation therapy to presenting symptoms of brain RN was 6 months. Twelve patients (92%) had clinical improvement with median time to symptom improvement of 33 days (range 1-109 days). One patient had transient improvement after HBOT but had recurrent symptomatic RN at 12 months. Of the eight patients with evaluable follow-up MRI, four patients had radiological improvement while four had stable necrosis appearance. Two patients had subsequent deterioration in MRI appearances, one each in the background of initial radiologic improvement and stability. Median survival was 15 months with median follow-up of 10 months. Seven patients reported side effects attributable to HBOT (54%), four of which were otologic in origin. CONCLUSIONS: HBOT is a safe and effective treatment for brain RN. HBOT showed clinical and radiologic improvement or stability in most patients. Prospective studies to further evaluate the effectiveness and side effects of HBOT are needed.

Utilisation de l'oxygénothérapie hyperbare à la suite de séances de radiothérapie entraînant la mort du tissu cérébral. Introduction: Si l'oxygénothérapie hyperbare (OHB) laisse entrevoir des résultats prometteurs dans le traitement des radionécroses (RN), les preuves demeurent limitées quant à son utilisation dans le cas de RN du cerveau. L'objectif de cette étude est de présenter des résultats de recherche liés, dans un seul établissement de santé, à l'utilisation de l'OHB dans le cas de RN symptomatiques du cerveau. Méthodes: Pour ce faire, nous avons effectué une analyse rétrospective des dossiers de patients atteints de RN symptomatiques du cerveau entre 2008 et 2018 et ayant été traités lors de séances d'OHB. Nous avons aussi recueilli des données de nature démographique et d'autres portant sur l'utilisation de stéroïdes, sur la réponse clinique et radiologique des patients et sur les toxicités. Le point de départ (index time) de notre étude a été la première séance d'OHB alors que son principal indicateur de résultat a été l'amélioration sur le plan clinique d'un symptôme particulier, ce qui a inclus une réduction des doses de stéroïdes. Résultats: Au total, treize patients atteints de RN symptomatiques ont été inclus dans cette étude. Le temps médian entre une ultime séance de radiothérapie et l'apparition de symptômes de RN a été de 6 mois. Douze patients (92 %) ont donné à voir une amélioration de leur état médical, la période médiane d'amélioration de leurs symptômes étant de 33 jours (étendue : 1­109 jours). On a observé chez un seul patient une amélioration transitoire à la suite de séances d'OHB, les symptômes de RN étant réapparus au douzième mois. Sur les huit patients ayant subi un examen d'imagerie de suivi, quatre d'entre eux ont montré des signes d'amélioration sur le plan radiologique tandis que quatre autres ont donné à voir une RN stable. Fait à noter, deux patients chez qui l'on avait observé une amélioration radiologique initiale ou une stabilité de leur état ont montré une détérioration ultérieure à la suite d'un examen d'IRM. Le taux de survie médian de ces patients et leur suivi médian ont été respectivement de 15 mois et de 10 mois. Enfin, sept d'entre eux ont signalé des effets secondaires attribuables à l'OHB, dont quatre d'origine otologique. Conclusions: L'OHB demeure un traitement efficace et sécuritaire dans le cas des RN du cerveau. Elle a permis d'observer chez la plupart des patients une amélioration clinique et radiologique ou à tout le moins une stabilité de leurs symptômes. Cela dit, des études prospectives sont nécessaires afin de pouvoir évaluer plus en profondeur son efficacité et ses effets secondaires.

Meningioma Screening With MRI in Childhood Leukemia Survivors Treated With Cranial Radiation.

PURPOSE: Radiation-induced meningioma is a known late effect of cranial radiation therapy. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect small meningiomas, but its potential value as a screening tool is unknown. METHODS AND MATERIALS: MRI was used to screen asymptomatic survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with cranial radiation therapy ≥10 years previously. The incidence of radiation-induced meningioma and outcomes of this group were compared with a historical cohort of survivors with the same exposure who underwent imaging only to investigate clinical signs or symptoms. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six childhood leukemia survivors were included in this study: 70 in the screening group and 106 unscreened. Screening MRI was performed a median of 25 years after radiation therapy and detected meningioma in 15 (21.4%). In the unscreened group, 17 patients (16.0%) had neurologic symptoms leading to an MRI a median interval of 24 years after radiation therapy, 9 of whom (8.5%) were diagnosed with meningioma. There was no significant difference between screened versus unscreened patients in the size of meningioma (mean diameter, 1.6 cm vs 2.6 cm; P = .13), meningioma incidence (7.4% vs 4.0% at 25 years; P = .19), or extent of resection. Three patients had persistent neurologic symptoms in the unscreened group versus none among screened patients (P = .28). CONCLUSIONS: Screening MRI was able to detect small meningiomas that were not clinically apparent; however, we could not demonstrate a significant improvement in the chance of total resection or a significant decrease in morbidity. A larger sample could clarify potential reduction in neurologic sequelae associated with screening.

Evidence on Effectiveness of Upper Neck Irradiation Versus Whole Neck Irradiation as Elective Neck Irradiation in Node-Negative Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a central tumor with a rich lymphatic network and a propensity for bilateral cervical lymph node metastasis. There is an orderly pattern of lymph node involvement in NPC. There is no current standard for prophylactic neck irradiation in node-negative or limited retropharyngeal (RP) node-positive NPC. This study aims to synthesize the current evidence on upper neck irradiation (UNI) versus whole neck irradiation (WNI) as prophylactic neck irradiation in node-negative or limited RP node-positive NPC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of relevant articles was done from 2000 to October 2015. Critical appraisal and meta-analysis of the eligible studies were undertaken to assess the effectiveness of UNI versus WNI as prophylactic neck irradiation in node-negative or limited involved RP node NPC. RESULTS: Only one randomized controlled trial investigated the use of prophylactic UNI versus WNI and showed no confirmed nodal relapse in both arms. Pooled analysis of four retrospective studies showed no significant difference in nodal recurrence, whether in-field or out-of-field recurrence. There was also no significant difference in terms of 5-year distant metastasis-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: In node-negative or limited RP node-positive NPC, the current evidence shows the possibility of treating only the upper neck (levels II, III, and VA) without compromising nodal control, distant metastasis, and overall survival. As a result of the scarcity of data, more randomized clinical trials are warranted in this subset of patients.

Interfraction Variation and Dosimetric Changes in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Intracavitary Brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Intracavitary brachytherapy is integral in the treatment of cervical cancer. Because of interfraction variation, the current standard is replanning with every fraction. This study aimed to determine whether there was a difference in relative dosimetry if the source position and dwell time of the first fraction were applied to subsequent fractions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of charts and films from 2007 to 2012. Eligible cases were patients with cervical cancer treated with brachytherapy with the same dose prescription to point A. Replanning was done on the first set of orthogonal plates. Source position and dwell time were subsequently applied to the remaining fractions using actual films. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were included in this study. The results showed that cervical, rectal, and bladder dose between the actual plan and the hypothetical plan were not statistically different. In the hypothetical plan, the source activity and dwell time of the first plan were applied to the orthogonal films of the subsequent fractions and showed no significant difference in all dose points. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed proof of concept of the safety of using the source position and dwell time of the first plan for subsequent fractions. Until further studies are performed (also using three-dimensional planning software), the concept should be considered investigational because of the small sample size of the study. Until such research is performed, it is still strongly recommended that replanning be performed with every fraction whenever it is feasible.

The evidence on effectiveness of weekly vs triweekly cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to synthesize the current available evidences on the effectiveness of weekly vs triweekly cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in the primary and adjuvant treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature were undertaken to assess the effectiveness of weekly vs triweekly schedule in primary and adjuvant treatment for HNSCC with adverse risk features. Search of relevant articles from electronic database from 2000 to March 2016 and appraisal of studies were done. RESULTS: Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and six retrospective studies were included in this review. The RCT showed less severe mucositis (75 vs 38.5%, p = 0.012) and more patients receiving at least 200 mg/m2 (62.5% vs 88.5%, p = 0.047) of cisplatin in triweekly arm. There was no difference in 1-year progression-free survival (60% vs 71.1%, p = 0.806) and 1-year overall survival (OS) (71.6 vs 79.3%, p = 0.978) between the weekly and triweekly arm. Pooling of data from six studies showed no difference in 5-year progression-free survival (RR 0.84, 95%, CI 0.67-1.07), 5-year OS (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.07), severe renal events (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42-1.04), severe mucositis (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.21), severe dermatitis (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.03), treatment interruptions (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.74-1.52) and number of patients receiving at least 200 mg/m2 (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.67-1.03). CONCLUSION: The current evidence showed that weekly schedule is not superior to triweekly in improving oncological outcomes and decreasing early effects of treatment. In the absence of compelling data, triweekly schedule should remain the standard of care while more RCTs are warranted. Advances in knowledge: While some have proposed that low-dose weekly cisplatin is safer and less toxic, this study emphasized that there is no difference in acute toxicity of the two schedules and it is safe to utilize high-dose cisplatin every 3 weeks to reach the threshold dose of 200 mg/m2 faster. Uniquely, this study excluded nasopharyngeal cancer patients as the biology and treatment response are different with other HNSCC.

Effectiveness of honey on radiation-induced oral mucositis, time to mucositis, weight loss, and treatment interruptions among patients with head and neck malignancies: A meta-analysis and systematic review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Mucositis is a disabling effect of radiotherapy in head and neck cancers. There is no current standard on management of radiation-induced mucositis. Honey has been shown to reduce radiation-induced mucositis. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to assess the ability of honey in reducing the severity of oral mucositis, time to mucositis, weight loss, and treatment interruptions. RESULTS: Eight studies were included and showed that honey was significantly better in lowering the risk for treatment interruptions, weight loss, and delaying time to mucositis, but not severity of mucositis. CONCLUSION: There is current evidence that honey is beneficial for patients with head and neck cancers by decreasing treatment interruptions, weight loss, and delaying the onset of oral mucositis, but not in decreasing peak mucositis score. In light of the results, honey is a reasonable treatment for radiation-induced mucositis, but more randomized clinical trials (RCTs) should be done. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1119-1128, 2016.

Evidence on effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus 2-dimensional radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Meta-analysis and a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Current management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) uses radiotherapy (RT) as the curative treatment modality. Radiation delivery techniques for NPC can be achieved using 2D conventional RT or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of IMRT versus 2D conventional RT in primary treatment of NPC. RESULTS: IMRT showed better results than 2D conventional RT in terms of local control, regional control, and overall survival, but when stratified, only in T4, N2, and stage III were the differences that were seen. Objective saliva measurements and physician-graded xerostomia were better in IMRT. However, patient-reported xerostomia showed minimal improvement only in IMRT. The evidence of superiority of IMRT over 2D conventional RT is not clear. CONCLUSION: In the absence of more clinical data demonstrating the superiority of IMRT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, 2D conventional RT seems to be a reasonable treatment option, especially in limited resource settings. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2130-E2142, 2016.