Arthroscopic Resection Arthroplasty for Scapholunate Advanced Collapse Wrist.

Purpose Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) wrist results from an untreated scapholunate dissociation and is the most common type of degenerative arthritis of the wrist. The most common surgical treatments for SLAC wrist are proximal row carpectomy and four-corner fusion with scaphoid excision. Arthroscopic surgical treatment for SLAC wrist has been reported; however, only limited data on functional outcomes are available. The purpose of this study is to report our 5-year follow-up clinical outcomes for arthroscopic treatment for SLAC wrist. Methods Thirty-one consecutive cases of arthroscopic resection arthroplasty for SLAC wrist were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, range of motion, grip strength, and pain (on 0-10 scale) as well as postoperative satisfaction (0 = not satisfied, 5 = completely satisfied) were recorded. Grip and range of motion were measured by an occupational therapist. Results The preoperative pain score was 7 and 0.18 postoperatively. The mean satisfaction at final follow-up was 4.8. Preoperative and final follow-up scores of the mean DASH was 48 and 3, respectively. The total arc of motion was 114 degrees preoperatively and 126.5 degrees postoperatively. Mean grip strength before surgery was 41 and 49 kg at final follow-up. Conclusion Arthroscopic resection arthroplasty for SLAC wrist results in significant improvement in patient function as measured by DASH and pain scores. Type of Study/Level of Evidence Therapeutic IV.

Endoscopic cubital tunnel decompression: state of the art.

Cubital tunnel syndrome is a common compressive neuropathy of the upper limb. Surgical decompression is indicated for patients who failed conservative therapy. Decompression in situ has shown to achieve comparable outcomes as decompression with anterior transposition in idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome. Endoscopic cubital tunnel decompression has gained popularity in recent years, as surgeons can attain decompression of the ulnar nerve along its course using a small incision. Results from randomised controlled studies and systematic reviews, comparing endoscopic with open decompression in situ, are promising. Cases in which anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is needed, an endoscopic technique can still be used by creating an additional volar portal, for the mobilisation of ulnar nerve. Early short-term results are encouraging. Further adequately powered, prospective, preferably double-blinded, randomised study are needed.

Endoscopic cubital tunnel decompression - Review of the literature.

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper limb. Endoscopic cubital tunnel decompression has gained popularity in recent years as this enables surgeons to achieve decompression of the ulnar nerve along its course using a small incision. This article describes the technical peals in performing endoscopic cubital tunnel decompression. In conditions which anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve is needed, subcutaneous transposition can be performed under endoscopic guidance. In addition, current literature is reviewed, and outcomes are presented. While short term results are encouraging, further prospective randomized study with longer follow-up is recommended.

Endoscopic Fascia Release for Forearm Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome: Case Report and Surgical Technique.

BACKGROUND: Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) of the forearm is traditionally treated with open compartment release requiring large incisions that can result in less than optimal esthetic results. The purpose of this study is to describe a case report of 2 professional motocross patients with forearm CECS treated endoscopically using a minimally invasive technique. METHODS: Two professional motocross racers presented with a history of chronic proximal volar forearm pain when motocross riding. Other symptoms included paresthesia and weakness, which, at times, led to an inability to continue riding. Both failed conservative management. Compartment pressure measurements were performed before and after provocative exercises to confirm diagnosis of CECS. Release of both the volar and dorsal compartments was performed endoscopically through a single incision. RESULTS: Symptoms resolved after surgery. The first patient resumed riding at 1 week, competing at 3 weeks, and continues to ride competitively without symptoms at 3 years postoperative. The second patient began riding at 1 week and won second place in the National Supercross finals 5 weeks after simultaneous bilateral release. CONCLUSIONS: This technique is simple and effective. The cannula used protects the superficial nerves while allowing release through a small, cosmetically pleasing incision.

Long-Term Outcome of Arthroscopic Resection Arthroplasty With or Without Interposition for Thumb Basal Joint Arthritis.

PURPOSE: To report results on 144 cases following arthroscopic resection arthroplasty (ARA) with or without interposition for basal joint arthritis. METHODS: Cases undergoing ARA for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis between 2004 and 2011 were prospectively enrolled (n = 178). Data were collected before surgery and after surgery at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Patients were excluded for less than 1-year follow-up or concomitant procedures that interfered with evaluation of the variable of interest (interposition). Human acellular dermal matrix (GRAFTJACKET) was the most commonly used interposition. Outcomes on 19 cases of interposition using collagen bioimplant (OrthADAPT) and porous polyurethaneurea (Artelon) scaffolds were also reported. Comparative analyses were performed on 52 patients with GRAFTJACKET interposition and on 73 without. Mean follow-up was 7.4 and 5.6 years with and without interposition, respectively. Descriptive statistics were evaluated on all baseline variables. Raw change scores of grip, pinch, and pain outcomes were evaluated. Confounding variables at a significance level of P less than .05 were adjusted for in linear mixed models, and an analysis of covariance was employed through an unstructured type of variance-covariance matrix. RESULTS: Change scores from baseline to 1 year for the interposition group for pain (numerical rating scale, 0-10), pinch, and grip was -5.8, 3.3, and 7, respectively, and -5.1, 2.1, and 9 for the noninterposition group. Postoperative mean satisfaction was 4.7 and 4.4 for the with- and without-interposition groups, respectively. There were 4 failures with and 2 without interposition. Artelon and OrthADAPT did poorly with unacceptably high failure rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that interposition is not necessary following ARA for thumb basal joint arthritis. Because arthroscopic interposition of material contributes to health care costs in terms of patient and facility costs without clear benefit to the patient, routine use of expensive interposition products should be abandoned or carefully evaluated with a prospective randomized controlled trial. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Setting expectations following endoscopic cubital tunnel release.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to evaluate recovery characteristics of patients undergoing endoscopic cubital tunnel release (ECuTR) by determining the following: (1) return to work (RTW) times following ECuTR compared with RTW times of patients that underwent anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve (ATUN), (2) satisfaction rates and factors affecting satisfaction, (3) resolution rates of common preoperative complaints and findings, and (4) effect of preoperative ulnar nerve subluxation on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A total of 172 cases in 148 patients undergoing ECuTR were prospectively enrolled including 56 women and 92 men. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to determine RTW time for ECuTR patients and for a cohort of 15 patients that underwent ATUN. Patients were evaluated for subjective and objective complaints preoperatively and postoperatively. Cases were grouped by Dellon's classification preoperatively and modified by Bishop's postoperatively. RESULTS: Half of ECuTR patients returned to normal work within 8 days postoperatively versus 71 days following ATUN. Variables significantly negatively affecting RTW were male sex, manual labor, and worker's compensation status. Dellon's was the best predictor of postoperative satisfaction. Complete resolution of symptoms occurred in 86 % of patients for weakness, 81 % for pain, 79 % for numbness and tingling (N/T), 78 % for atrophy, 76 % for abnormal two-point discrimination, and 65 % for Wartenberg's. Preoperative ulnar nerve subluxation had no effect on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Improved RTW time following ECuTR versus ATUN indicates potential and substantial cost-saving implications with respect to reduced worker productivity loss. Patients with more severe preoperative Dellon's classification can expect less optimal results regarding postoperative satisfaction and resolution rates of N/T and pain.

Arthroscopic Resection Arthroplasty of the Radial Column for SLAC Wrist.

Background Symptomatic advanced scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) wrists are typically treated with extensive open procedures, including but not limited to scaphoidectomy plus four-corner fusion (4CF) and proximal row carpectomy (PRC). Although a minimally invasive arthroscopic option would be desirable, no convincing reports exist in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to describe a new surgical technique and outcomes on 14 patients who underwent arthroscopic resection arthroplasty of the radial column (ARARC) for arthroscopic stage II through stage IIIB SLAC wrists and to describe an arthroscopic staging classification of the radiocarpal joint for patients with SLAC wrist. Patients and Methods Data were collected prospectively on 17 patients presenting with radiographic stage I through III SLAC wrist who underwent ARARC in lieu of scaphoidectomy and 4CF or PRC. Fourteen patients (12 men and 2 women) subject to 1-year follow-up were included. The average age was 57 years (range 41 to 78). The mean follow-up was 24 months (range 12 to 61). Arthroscopic resection arthroplasty of the radial column is described for varying stages of arthritic changes of the radioscaphoid joint. Midcarpal resection was not performed. Results The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score was 66 preoperatively and 28 at final follow-up. The mean satisfaction (0 = not satisfied, 5 = completely satisfied) at final follow-up was 4.5 (range 3 to 5). The pain level (on 0-10 scale) improved from 6.6 to 1.3. The total arc of motion changed from 124° preoperatively to 142° postoperatively following an ARARC. Grip was 16 kg preoperatively and 18 kg postoperatively. Radiographic stages typically underestimated arthroscopic staging. Although four of our patients appeared to be radiographic stage I, all were found to have arthritis involving some or all of the radioscaphoid articulation at the time of arthroscopy. Clinical Relevance Pain relief is rapid and remains consistent over time following ARARC. ARARC may be a viable surgical option for patients with SLAC wrist who desire a minimally invasive procedure. Radiographic stages underestimate the degree of arthritic change. Accurate staging requires arthroscopy. The indications and long-term outcome are not well defined; continued surveillance is warranted. Level of Evidence Level IV, Therapeutic study.

The patient's perspective on carpal tunnel surgery related to the type of anesthesia: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to provide prospective independently analyzed evidence on how patients feel about a carpal tunnel release (CTR) performed under local anesthesia only (no sedation or tourniquet) versus with local anesthesia, intravenous (IV) sedation, and a tourniquet. METHODS: This prospective cohort study compared 100 consecutive CTRs done with only lidocaine and epinephrine in Saint John, New Brunswick to 100 consecutive CTRs done with IV sedation in Davenport, Iowa. Patient perspectives on the anesthesia were captured in a blinded questionnaire 1 week postoperatively. RESULTS: For subsequent surgery, 93 % of wide awake patients would choose local anesthesia only and 93 % of sedated patients would choose sedation. Wide awake patients spent less time at the hospital (M = 2.6 h) than sedated patients (M = 4.0 h; p < .001). Preoperative blood work, electrocardiograms, and/or chest radiographs were done for 3 % of wide awake patients and 48 % of sedated patients (p < 0.001). Preoperative anxiety levels for wide awake patients were lower than for sedated patients (p = 0.007); postoperative anxiety was similar. There were no anesthesia complications in either group. Narcotics were used by 5 % of unsedated patients and 67 % of sedated patients (p < 0.001). Adequate pain control was reported by 89 % and 90 % of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients from both cohorts liked whichever method of anesthesia they received and would choose it again. However, sedated patients spent more time at the hospital, required more preoperative testing, and reported greater preoperative anxiety.

Wrong site surgery-where are we and what is the next step?

BACKGROUND: Wrong site surgery is estimated to occur 40 times per week in hospitals and clinics in USA. The universal protocol was implemented by the joint commission board of commissioners to address wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong person surgery. DISCUSSION: The universal protocol has three principal components: preoperative verification, marking of the operative site, and a time-out. Despite this organized approach to this problem, current data do not demonstrate any progress. In fact some data suggest that the problem may be getting worse. It is apparent that a process relying on surgeon and surgical team memory is doomed to ultimate failure. Recommendations are made for a more in depth checklist process based on the recommendations of the World Health Organization, reports in the literature of known areas of weakness in the current process, and personal experience in hopes of establishing a more bullet proof system to avoid wrong site procedure.

New frontiers in hand arthroscopy.

This article covers new and emerging techniques in small joint arthroscopy in the hand. Recent improvement in the quality of small joint scopes and advancement in techniques have allowed for many new small joint arthroscopic procedures in the hand. The arthroscopic classification for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis as well as treatment of each stage are described. Arthroscopic treatment of pantrapezial arthrosis is reviewed. Metacarpophalangeal arthroscopy for the treatment of synovitis, arthritis, fractures, and gamekeeper injuries are discussed, as is arthroscopy of the proximal interphalangeal, pisotriquetral, fourth and fifth CMC, and distal interphalangeal joints.

Arthroscopic resection arthroplasty for treatment of combined carpometacarpal and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (pantrapezial) arthritis.

PURPOSE: Arthroscopy of the carpometacarpal (CMC) and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joints has been described for the purpose of diagnosing, staging, and treating CMC and STT pathology. This study evaluates the short-term outcome of arthroscopic resection arthroplasty (ARA) for pantrapezial arthritis. METHODS: Thirty-five cases of ARA of the CMC and STT joints were performed in 34 patients with one year minimum follow-up. There were 27 women and 7 men. Average age was 63 (range, 46 to 79). All patients had simultaneous ARA of both the CMC and STT joints. A 2- to 3-mm section of bone was resected from the proximal and distal aspect of both the CMC and STT joints. Preoperative data collected included 10-point self-reported pain scale, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) outcome measure, range of motion, grip strength, key and chuck pinch, length of symptoms, and treatment. Postoperative data included the same data plus patient satisfaction, graded on a 0 to 5 scale. Data were collected at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12. RESULTS: Average time of postoperative immobilization was less than 3 weeks (range, 2-6). The DASH scores averaged 46 before surgery, and 51, 30, 20, and 19 respectively, for the aforementioned postoperative intervals. The mean improvement in key pinch was 1.3 kg. The mean improvement in grip was 4.3 kg. Pain improved from 7 before surgery to 1 at one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term analysis suggests that ARA for pantrapezial arthritis provides satisfactory pain relief and return of strength and function.

Endoscopic cubital tunnel release.

A minimally invasive endoscopic approach has been successfully applied to surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. This procedure allows for smaller incisions with faster recovery time. This article details relevant surgical anatomy, indications, contraindications, surgical technique, complications, and postoperative management.

Endoscopic cubital tunnel recurrence rates.

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common nerve entrapment in the upper extremity. There are no current publications concerning the recurrence rates after endoscopic cubital tunnel release. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the recurrence rate of endoscopic cubital tunnel release compared to published reports of recurrence following open cubital tunnel procedures. We reviewed 134 consecutive cases of endoscopic cubital tunnel release in 117 patients. There were 104 cases in 94 patients with greater than 3 months follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 736 days. They were grouped using Dellon's classification. Two literature control groups were used from published reports of recurrence rate following open cubital tunnel release. A recurrence was identified if the patient was symptom-free following surgery but had symptoms reappear 3 months or more after surgery as defined in the literature. Of the 104 cases, 92.31% had more than a 4-month follow-up. One case (0.96%) met the criteria for recurrence at 4 months postprocedure. Data were then compared to the literature control groups used from published reports of recurrence rates following open cubital tunnel release. Pooled, the combined controls had 22 of 180 cases (12.22%) with recurrences. The percentage of procedure recurrence varied significantly with p value equal to 0.0004. It is recognized that there is a lack of common classification and comparative analysis of these studies, but they do classify preoperative grading and recurrence similarly. We are 95% confident that our true recurrence rate is between 0.02% and 5.24% and that endoscopic cubital tunnel release has a recurrence rate, which is not higher than open cubital tunnel release literature controls.

Arthroscopic distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis.

Arthrodesis using a headless screw has been shown to be an effective surgical treatment for pain, deformity, or instability arising at the distal interphalangeal joint of the fingers or interphalangeal joint of the thumb. Previous publications have documented the utility of this treatment using open techniques. Common indications include degenerative, inflammatory, or posttraumatic arthritis and chronic mallet finger or chronic flexor digitorum profundus injury. The purpose of this study is to present an arthroscopic technique for arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint of the fingers or interphalangeal joint of the thumb using the headless screw. The surgical technique is carefully outlined including surgical setup and necessary equipment. Potential technical difficulties and complications are also reviewed.