Relationships of peri-partum, plasma concentrations of progesterone, oestrogens and 13,14-dihydro-15-ketoprostaglandin F2alpha in heifers and of anatomical measurements of dam and calf with difficulty of calving in early-bred Hereford x Friesian heifers.

Plasma concentrations of progesterone, oestradiol-17beta, oestrone, oestrone sulphate and PGFM have been measured daily during the first peri-partum period of 45 Hereford x Friesian heifers bred at 11 months of age. Anatomical measurements of dam and calf were also recorded. Twelve of the calvings were scored easy, 33 difficult. Each of five models (fitted by linear logistic regression) relating difficulty of calving to the hormonal and anatomical measurements, predicts with at least 94% accuracy the calving score (easy or difficult) among the calvings. The models predict that increases of progesterone concentration on the day before calving, of oestrone sulphate concentration on the day after calving and of heifer heart girth decrease the odds of difficult calving, whereas increases of heifer body length and of calf head circumference increase the odds of difficult calving.

Drug interactions: the effects of alcohol and meprobamate applied singly and jointly in human subjects. III. The concentrations of alcohol and meprobamate in the blood and their effects on performance; application of mathematical models.

The relations between the levels of alcohol and meprobamate in the blood and performance on a visual-motor coordination tracking task were analyzed by a general system of mathematical models, using data from Experiment V by Carpenter et al. [J. Stud. Alc., Suppl. No. 7, pp. 54-139, 1975]. The derivation of the models is described. In general, the relationship between blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and performance was nonmonotonic: best performance occurred at BACS of 10 to 20 mg per 100 ml. The relationship between meprobamate concentration (BMC) and performance was monotonic: performance deteriorated with increasing BMC. The results of the reaction latency measure, howevr, showed no consistent relationship with BAC or BMC. The action of alcohol can be represented by a model which involves 2 distinct sites of action; that of meprobamate, 1 site. It could not be determined whether the site of action of meprobamate is distinct from those of alcohol because the blood levels of the drugs were not high enough. The implications of the results are discussed, with particular reference to the quantitative description of the joint action of drugs and the design of future experiments.

Drug interactions: the effects of alcohol and meprobamate applied singly and jointly in human subjects. IV. The concentrations of alcohol and meprobamate in the blood.

The absorption and elimination of alcohol and meprobamate from the blood during Experiments IV (E-IV) and V (E-V) of Carpenter et al. [J. Stud. Alc., Suppl. No. 7, pp. 54-139, 1975] were studied by means of mathematical models representing the relation between doses, concentration in the blood and time elapsing since drug ingestion. The blood concentrations of samples taken 2 and 5.5 hr after beginning to drink in E-IV and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 hr in E-V were analyzed. The presence of meprobamate did not affect blood alcohol concentration (BAC) in either experiment. At 2 hr the mean BACS after 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 g of alcohol per kg were 6.8, 20.9, 37.7 and 53.7 mg per 100 ml in E-IV; 5.0, 34.1, 42.0 and 72.0 mg per 100 ml in E-V; and 8.1, 32.6, 41.3 and 71.3 mg per 100 ml when calculated by regression from E-V data. The calculated elimination rate of the 2 highest doses of alcohol in E-IV was 6.0 and 7.1 mg per 100 ml per hr; in E-V the mean calculated rates after 0.25-0.75 and after 1.00 g of alcohol per kg were 6.6 and 11.0 mg per 100 ml per hr. The blood meprobamate concentrations (BMC) in E-IV were not affected by alcohol. In E-V, 2.5 and 5.5 hr after meprobamate administration, the combination of 28 mg of meprobamate per kg and 0.75 g of alcohol per kg resulted in significantly lower BMC (7.83 and 12.63 mug per 100 ml) than after same dose of meprobamate with the other doses of alcohol (14.23 and 20.02 mug per 100 ml). The differences between these results and the findings of Carpenter et al. are discussed.