Interobserver Variation in Echocardiographic Measurements and Grading of Tricuspid Regurgitation Based on a Novel Web-Based Assessment Environment.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to assess interobserver variability in grading tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity. The authors' secondary goals were to delineate which transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) parameters best correlate with severity and how consistent the participants were at grading severity. DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study of how clinicians evaluated previously acquired TEE images and videos. SETTING: The 19 TEE studies of patients with TR were recorded by 4 senior echocardiographers across 4 US academic institutions. The participants evaluated these cases on a novel, web-based, assessment environment designed specifically for this study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine fellowship-trained and board-certified cardiologists and cardiothoracic anesthesiologists volunteered to participate in the study as observers from 19 different institutions. INTERVENTIONS: No interventions were performed on the participants. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For each case, participants measured the vena contracta (VC), proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA), and jet area before giving a final classification on the severity of TR. Variation was highest for effective regurgitant orifice area and lowest for VC and PISA. The coefficient of variation, defined as the standard deviation from the mean divided by the mean, for all cases of trace, mild, moderate and severe TR were as follows: Jet Area-111%, 46%, 48%, 76%; VC-67%, 44%, 43%, 36%; PISA-52%, 48%, 31%, 35%; and effective regurgitant orifice area-127%, 95%, 66%, 58%. CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver variation in quantifying TEE parameters for TR is high, suggesting these may be difficult to measure reliably in a busy perioperative setting. Of the parameters assessed, VC and PISA radius had the highest interobserver agreement and the highest correlation with severity.

A Tale of Two Valves: Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Obstruction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome.

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APLAS) are at risk for cardiac manifestations, specifically valvular heart disease requiring valve replacement. Bioprosthetic valve endocarditis is an important cause of valve failure, and it is important to keep a wide differential, especially in patients with preexisting SLE and APLAS. In this E-challenge, 2 cases of bioprosthetic aortic valve endocarditis are presented; 1 case describes infective bacterial endocarditis on an aortic prosthesis and the second describes a patient with SLE and APLAS who developed bioprosthetic valve obstruction secondary to vegetations, consistent with nonbacterial endocarditis and thrombus. Etiologies for bioprosthetic valve obstruction and evaluation by echocardiography are explored. The comparison between these 2 cases specifically highlights the importance of keeping a wide differential in endocarditis, prosthetic valve vegetations, and bioprosthetic valve obstruction.

Inverted Aortic Prosthesis in the Mitral Position: Is Upside Down Always the Right Side Up?

Evaluation of prosthetic valve function is a challenging task. The clinician has to employ multiple parameters to quantify dysfunction (if present), the results of which can be mutually discrepant. This results from heterogeneity in the design of the valves themselves, implantation techniques, and both intra- and interpatient hemodynamic variability. Specifically, the location and angle of valve implantation can have a profound impact on its flow characteristics that can lead to symptoms despite satisfactory mechanical function. The authors present the case of inverted implantation of a prosthesis designed for the aortic position in the mitral annulus and resultant mitral stenosis. What follows is an examination of how the flow characteristics, such as pressure recovery, energy loss, and vortex formation, create a gradient that could not be explained by valve size alone.

Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of functional mitral regurgitation proximal isovelocity surface area.

BACKGROUND: The geometric shape of the mitral regurgitation (MR) proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) is conventionally assumed to be a hemisphere (HS). However, in functional MR, PISA is frequently neither an HS nor a hemiellipse (HE) but is often asymmetric and crescent shaped. We used 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic (3D TEE), full-volume data sets to directly measure the PISA and subsequently compared calculated values of effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) with conventional 2D TEE techniques. EROA calculations from all PISA measurements were finally compared with the cross-sectional area at the vena contracta, a well-validated reference measure of the functional MR orifice area. METHODS: Twenty-four cardiac surgical patients with functional MR, who underwent routine intraoperative TEE examinations with a 3D matrix array probe (X7-2t; IE33; Philips Healthcare, Inc., Andover, MA) were retrospectively evaluated for MR severity using quantitative 2D and 3D TEE-derived techniques. Conventional 2D TEE methods were used to estimate PISA assuming an HS shape and an HE shape. In addition, direct measurement of the 3D PISA was obtained (QLab, Philips Healthcare, Inc.) from corresponding full-volume, color-flow Doppler data sets. EROAs calculated from HS- and HE-PISA techniques were compared with the same values obtained from 3D TEE PISAs. EROAs obtained from all 3 PISA techniques were subsequently compared with vena contracta area. RESULTS: Three-dimensional PISA was significantly larger than both HS-PISA and HE-PISA (mean ± SD: 4.65 ± 2.03 cm² vs 2.10 ± 1.58 cm² and 2.75 ± 1.42 cm²; both P < 0.0001), respectively. HE-PISA was also larger than HS-PISA (P = 0.042). In addition, 3D EROA was larger than both HS- and HE-acquired EROAs (mean ± SD: 0.44 ± 0.21 vs 0.19 ± 0.12 cm² and 0.26 ± 0.14; both P < 0.0001), respectively, while HE-EROA was larger than HS-EROA (P = 0.024). Vena contracta area correlated well with 3D EROA (Spearman r = 0.865), HS-EROA (Spearman r = 0.820; P < 0.001) and HE-EROA (Spearman r = 0.819). However, the difference between vena contracta area and 3D EROA was significantly less than the differences between vena contracta area and either 2D HS- or 2D HE-EROA (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative assessment of functional MR severity by 3D TEE may be superior to 2D methods by permitting more direct measures of PISA. Two-dimensional TEE techniques for assessing functional MR severity that rely on an HS- or HE-PISA shape may underestimate the EROA due to geometric assumptions that do not account for asymmetry.

Complete regression of Barrett's esophagus after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Regression of Barrett's esophagus may occur after effective anti-reflux surgery. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is an effective operation to treat morbid obesity. In addition, it provides complete relief of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Regression of Barrett's has not been reported after RYGBP. We performed a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on a patient with GERD and Barrett's esophagus. At 1 year after the RYGBP, an upper endoscopy was performed as routine surveillance for the patient's Barrett's esophagus; endoscopic and histologic evaluation demonstrated complete regression of the Barrett's esophagus. The patient lost one-third of her preoperative weight and had resolution of her reflux symptoms. RYGBP limits the amount of acid reflux and completely diverts bile away from the esophagus. This may lead to the regression of Barrett's esophagus.