The amino acid composition of tissue protein is affected by the total sulfur amino acid supply in growing pigs.

The factorial approach to assess the amino acid (AA) requirements of pigs is based on the assumption that the AA composition of body protein is constant. However, there are indications that this assumption may not be valid because the AA composition of body protein can be affected by the AA supply. The extent to which different tissues are affected by an AA deficiency is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of feeding pig diets with a deficient or sufficient total sulfur AA supply (TSAA; Met+Cys) from 6 to 23 weeks of age on tissue composition and meat quality. The deficient diet (TSAA-) provided 24% Met : Lys and 51% TSAA : Lys on a standardized ileal digestible basis, which are 19% and 16% below the recommended requirements, respectively. The sufficient diet (TSAA+) provided 33% Met : Lys and 60% TSAA : Lys. Diets were offered slightly below the ad libitum feed intake capacity of the pigs. Pigs offered diet TSAA- had a lower average daily gain, lower weights of the longissimus dorsi (LM) and rhomboideus muscles (RM), and of selected skin sections (P<0.05). The weight of different sections of the small intestine and the liver was not affected by the diet. The protein content of the LM and RM decreased in pigs offered diet TSAA- (P<0.05), whereas the protein content of other tissues was not affected. The TSAA supply affected the AA composition (g/16 g N) of protein in all tissues, but the Met content was changed only in the liver (P<0.05). Pigs receiving diet TSAA- had a lower Cys content in the RM and in the distal jejunum and ileum (P<0.01). The deficient TSAA supply resulted in a lower carcass weight and higher muscle glycogen stores (P<0.05), but did not affect other meat quality traits. The results of this study indicate that the muscles, jejunum and ileum respond more to a prolonged AA deficiency than the liver. In addition, the observed changes in AA composition of tissue protein question the use of a constant AA profile of retained protein to assess AA requirements.

Changes in body composition in broilers by a sulfur amino acid deficiency during growth.

In the factorial approach, amino acid (AA) requirements are determined using the AA composition of retained protein, which is assumed to be constant. However, this hypothesis may not be valid because the AA composition of body protein can be affected by the diet. The objective of this study was to quantify the changes in chemical body composition of broilers receiving diets either deficient (TSAA-) or sufficient (TSAA+) in TSAA. Diet TSAA+ was formulated according to the Ross recommendation. Diet TSAA- provided 36% true digestible Met:Lys and 64% true digestible TSAA:Lys, which were, respectively, 34 and 22% lower compared with diet TSAA+. Performance and tissue weight gain between 7 and 42 d of age were not affected by the TSAA supply. In TSAA- chickens, protein gain was lower in the carcass (P < 0.01) and tended to be lower in the empty body (P = 0.06) and pectoralis major muscle (P = 0.10). Compared with TSAA+ chickens, lipid gain in TSAA- chickens was 78% greater in the pectoralis muscle (P < 0.001), 28% greater in abdominal fat (P < 0.05), and 10% greater in the carcass (P = 0.10). In the pectoralis muscle, there was a tendency for an increase in the redness value (a*; P = 0.10). The TSAA supply affected the AA composition of tissues and tissue gain, but the Met and Cys concentrations were changed only in the offal (P = 0.08). The deficient TSAA supply resulted in an increase in the Ser concentration in the empty body, carcass, and pectoralis muscle (P < 0.05). In contrast, it resulted in a decrease in the concentrations of Lys and Glu in the empty body, of Phe, Tyr, Gly, and Glu in the pectoralis muscle, and of Ala in the offal (P < 0.05). This indicates that although chickens cope with a TSAA deficiency predominantly by changing the protein and lipid concentration in the body, the AA composition is also affected. This calls into question the use of a constant ideal AA profile in poultry nutrition.