[Assessment of ophthalmological surgical training in Île-de-France: Results of a survey on 89 residents]. / Formation chirurgicale en ophtalmologie en Île-de-France : résultats d'une enquête sur 89 internes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate surgical training in ophthalmology through feedback from residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was created, including 20 items which assessed the number of complete or partial surgical procedures performed during a semester, self-assessment of surgical skills, use of surgical simulators, an overall rating of the surgical training received and some suggestions to improve surgical training. It was sent by email to all residents in training in Île-de-France (DES Île-de-France and Inter-CHU), France. RESULTS: From October 23 to November 7, 2021, 89/137 residents responded to the questionnaire (65%). Since the beginning of their residency, ninety percent of the residents received training using simulators. Over 90% performed all of the technical steps of a "standard" cataract surgery at least once during the semester, and 60% 10 times or more. The least performed technical steps or procedures also received the lowest self-assessment: management of expulsive hemorrhage, open-globe or lacrimal laceration wound suturing, capsular tension ring injection, and intraocular lens explantation. Residents gave an overall average rating of 6.6/10 to their training and suggested some feedback on videos of resident surgeries (67%) and theoretical courses dealing with surgical techniques (61%). DISCUSSION: The increasing use of simulators should improve surgical training. Residents express the need for training regarding surgical complications and emergencies as well as improvement of their technical skills via improved feedback. CONCLUSION: Surgical teaching appears suitable for learning cataract surgery but seems less effective for the management of emergencies and intraoperative complications.

[Efficacy and tolerance of Latanoprost given as a first intention in the treatment of primitive open angle glaucoma in African melanoderm]. / Efficacité et tolérance du Latanoprost donné en première intention dans le traitement du glaucome primitif a angle ouvert chez le mélanoderme africain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reduction in IOP and ocular symptoms in patients newly diagnosed with POAG and treated with latanoprost as monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A multicentric, cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted. We included adults newly diagnosed with POAG. All patients received one drop of preserved latanoprost 0.005% in each eye every night for 12 weeks. Changes in IOP and ophthalmic signs and symptoms were assessed during and at the end of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 524 patients were included, with a participation rate of 93% at 12 weeks. The mean age was 52.79±17.33 years, and the sex ratio M/F was 1.39. At inclusion, the mean IOP was 21.68±9.72mmHg. After 2 weeks of treatment, the mean IOP was 15.49±5.81mmHg, for a reduction of 28.55%. After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean IOP was 13.16±3.54mmHg, for a reduction of 39.30%. The main symptom recorded was a gritty foreign body sensation, the frequency of which was 4.72% at W2 and 2.45% at W12. The main sign was hyperemia (4.33% at W2 and 1.84% at W12). CONCLUSION: Latanoprost given as first-line monotherapy in POAG in blacks considerably reduces IOP. The incidence of side effects remains low; it is higher at the start of treatment.

[Efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy in the treatment of Meibomian gland dysfunction-related severe dry eye]. / Efficacité de la lumière pulsée dans le traitement des sécheresses oculaires sévères par dysfonctionnement meibomien.

INTRODUCTION: Dry eye syndrome caused by Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a common disease in the general population and impairs quality of life. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) has mainly been used in dermatology for the treatment of skin disorders, and more recently for MGD-related dry eye. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of IPL with the E-Eye® device (E-Swin, Houdan, France) in severe MGD-related dry eye patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This non-comparative study included 20 patients with MGD-related dry eye with a Break-Up Time (BUT)<10seconds, dry eye symptoms >30mm on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and failure of lid hygiene and artificial tears. Treatment consisted of 3 sessions of IPL on D0, D15, and D45 (5 flashes of 13J/cm2 per eye). The following parameters were assessed at each visit and at D75 : symptoms graded with a VAS and the Standard Patient Assessment of Eye Dryness questionnaire (SPEED), BUT, corneal fluorescein staining, Meibomian gland expression score, meibography, tear film lipid layer thickness by interferometry and the ocular scattering index by double-pass aberrometry (OQAS). Statistical analysis was performed on the eye most affected at baseline. RESULTS: We included 40 eyes of 20 patients, 15 female and 5 male, mean age 47±15 years (24 to 74 years). The symptoms rated by VAS were severe, averaging 69±25mm. After treatment, there was a statistically significant decrease in symptoms, with a 14mm VAS decrease (55±29mm at D75 versus 69mm at D0, P=0.048) and SPEED score of 3.4 (19.0±6mm versus 22.4±4.6, P=0.03). The number of expressible Meibomian gland ducts increased significantly (from 5.9 to 8.1, P=0.04), lid redness decreased (from 1.4 to 0.6, P=NS) and BUT improved (from 4.2 to 5.9, P=NS). Other parameters remained unchanged. Three patients (15%) complained of transient ocular burning after each treatment. CONCLUSION: IPL appears to be effective in improving signs and symptoms in patients with severe MGD-related dry eye, with a good safety profile. Its exact mechanism of action remains to be elucidated.

[Treatment of noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis]. / Traitement des uvéites intermédiaires, postérieures et panuvéites non infectieuses.

Controlling long-term inflammation during non-infectious intermediate, posterior or panuveitis while limiting side effects remains challenging. There is no standardized pre-therapeutic evaluation providing diagnostic certainty, but some simple tests allow us to identifiy the main etiologies. The ophthalmologist identifies the type of uveitis, and the internist completes the investigations according to the ophthalmologist's findings. Fundus photographs, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography should be considered during diagnosis and follow-up. Ocular complications of uveitis are numerous. They require close monitoring and specific medical and sometimes surgical management. The growing number of available drugs makes it possible to optimize the management of these conditions with varied etiologies and presentations. Currently, systemic corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy, and other alternatives are considered in the case of poor tolerance, steroid resistance or dependence. The choice of a systemic, periocular or intravitreal treatment depends on several factors: chronicity or recurrence of uveitis, duration, bilaterality, association with a systemic inflammatory disease, the presence of contraindications to certain treatments, and also socioeconomic constraints. It is of the utmost importance to find the best compromise allowing tight control of ocular inflammation by means of adapted systemic and/or local treatment while avoiding the main complications.

[Prevention of post intravitreal injection endophthalmitis: is antibioprophylaxis indicated?]. / Prévention de l'endophtalmie post injection intravitréenne : l'antibioprophylaxie a-t-elle sa place ?

Endophthalmitis remains the main complication of intravitreal injections, especially because their repetition multiplicates the risks. Surgical antisepsis is required for the prevention of endophthalmitis, but the benefit/risk ratio of topical antibioprophylaxis has never been demonstrated. In contrast, the selection of resistant bacteria appears to be exponential with the wider use of topical antibioprophylaxis. It seems that more and more operators stop using anibioprophylaxis, provided that the antisepsis is surgical and that the injection is performed in accordance with the rules of good practice.

[Intravitreal injections: AFSSAPS guide to good practice]. / Injections intravitréennes: mise au point de l'AFSSAPS.

Intravitreal injections are very commonly performed in the daily practice of Ophthalmology and become a leading procedure in the management of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, infectious endophthalmitis or retinitis, uveitis and retinal vein occlusions. Based on the comments of a group of experts, including ophthalmologists, pharmacists and hygienists, the French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS) edited a guide to good practice of intravitreal injections, revisiting those previously published in 2006. The overall experience accumulated during time is a valuable source of information to determine the most appropriate protocol. Therefore, the simplification of the procedure is reasonably proposed even though safety remains a major issue, in order to avoid complications, especially infections.

[Antibioprophylaxis in ocular surgery: AFSSAPS recommendations]. / Antibioprophylaxie en chirurgie ophtalmologique. À propos des recommandations de l'AFSSAPS.

According to the literature and to the advice of experts, the French Agency for the Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS) edited recommendations about the antibioprophylaxis in ocular surgery. One goal was to avoid the extensive use of oral and topical fluoroquinolones in antibioprophylaxis, in order to preserve their antibacterial activity for curative treatments of severe eye infections. The medical team decides for the indication and the type of antibioprophylaxis for each patient. A topical antibiotic is recommended for any eye surgery until the etancheity of incisions. Due to the risk of selection of bacterial resistance topical fluoroquinolones are not recommended in this indication. In open eye surgery, an additional antibioprophylaxis is recommended: in cataract surgery, injection in the anterior chamber at the end of the procedure of 1mg of cefuroxime; in other open eye surgeries, only in case of risk factors for endophthalmitis, administration of 500 mg oral levofloxacin tablet 12 hours and two hours before surgery. For ocular punctures and intravitreal injections, only a topical postoperative antibiotic is recommended until healing.

[Efficacy assessment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus tobramycin 0.3% on clinical signs of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis]. / Evaluation de l'efficacité d'un collyre azithromycine 1,5% versus tobramycine 0,3% sur les signes cliniques de la conjonctivite bactérienne purulente.

INTRODUCTION: Bacterial conjunctivitis is characterized by hyperemia and discharge of one or both eyes. These clinical signs appear quickly and are contagious. This study compares the clinical efficacy (signs and symptoms) and safety of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops with tobramycin 0.3%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked study including 1,043 patients with purulent bacterial conjunctivitis. Patients received either azithromycin twice daily for 3 days or tobramycin, 1 drop every 2 hours for 2 days, then four times daily for 5 days. The primary variable was clinical cure at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (D9) on the worst eye. The cure was defined as bulbar conjunctival injection and discharge scores of 0. Clinical signs were evaluated at D0, D3, and D9. RESULTS: In the azithromycin group 87.8% of patients and in the tobramycin group 89.4% were clinically cured at D9. Clinical cure with azithromycin was not inferior to tobramycin at D9: discharge was absent in 96.3% of patients treated with azithromycin and 95.1% with tobramycin. Azithromycin was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin 1.5% for 3 days (six drops) was as effective as tobramycin for 7 days (36 drops). Furthermore, patients on azithromycin presented earlier clinical cure on Day 3 than patients on tobramycin. Azyter, with its convenient dosing (bid for 3 days), is a step forward in the management of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis.

[Phacoemulsification: advantages of a consultation the day after surgery?]. / Phacoémulsification : intérêt de la visite du lendemain ?

INTRODUCTION: Cataract surgery is the most frequent surgery in France. The D1 consultation limits the extension of ambulatory care to patients who can return on their own the day after sugery. We assessed the usefulness of this systematic D1 consultation in terms of therapeutic modifications. MATERIAL AND MéTHODE: Retrospective study of patients who underwent cataract surgery in a teaching hospital from february to july 2006. The major parameter was the modification of postsurgical treatment after the D1 consultation. RESULTS: Of the 380 operated eyes studied, the patients included 145 men and 235 women, the mean age was 73.8 years (range, 43-92), 86% underwent conventional hospitalization, 70% had been operated by a senior surgeon, and 66% had no suture. At the D1 visit, 11 modifications (2.9%) were recorded: one case of athalamia, one Seidel-positive test, four cases of high IOP (>30mmHg), and five severe inflammations of the anterior segment. All the treatment changes were reported in the group of hospitalized patients, none were reported in the ambulatory patients. Of the 380 eyes studied, only one required sutures at D1, the other treatment changes were minor. CONCLUSIONS: The low output of the D1 visit raises the problem of its relevance in terms of public health. In most of the English-speaking and Scandinavian countries, patients have only one postoperative visit at 1 month. Patients could receive written and oral recommendations and a hotline number to contact the surgical team, which could allow the D1 visit to be discontinued for standard patients with uncomplicated surgery.

[Optic disc drusen or true papilledema?]. / Drusen de la tête du nerf optique ou oedème papillaire?

INTRODUCTION: Bilateral optic disc drusen can mimic papilledema, raising the question of intracranial hypertension and sometimes prompting unnecessary or invasive procedures. STATE OF THE ART AND PERSPECTIVES: Optic disc drusen are benign calcified masses, often visible within the optic nerve head. However, their clinical diagnosis can be more difficult at earlier stages of life, when they are buried within the optic nerve. Visual field loss can occur in patients with longstanding optic disc drusen. CONCLUSION: Ophthalmoscopy and B-scan ocular ultrasonography allow appropriate diagnosis of bilateral optic disc drusen mimicking papilledema. On rare occasions, optic disc drusen can be associated with ischemic complications, the other causes of drusen-related visual loss being exceptionally rare.

Microbiological efficacy of 3-day treatment with azithromycin 1.5% eye-drops for purulent bacterial conjunctivitis.

PURPOSE: Antibacterial efficacy of topically applied azithromycin 1.5% was compared with tobramycin 0.3% in a multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked study for the treatment of purulent bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: A total of 1043 adults and children received either azithromycin twice daily for 3 days (n=524) or tobramycin every 2 hours while awake for 2 days, then four times daily for 5 days (n=519). Conjunctival swabbing was taken at days 0, 3, and 9, using alginate swabs resuspended in a dissolution-transport medium, providing rapid and reproducible results. Cagle's criteria were used to define the pathogenicity level for each isolated bacterium. RESULTS: In the per-protocol set, the rate of bacteriologic resolution was 85.2% for azithromycin versus 83.8% for tobramycin on day 3, and 92.8% for azithromycin versus 94.6% for tobramycin on day 9. Azithromycin was demonstrated to be noninferior to tobramycin according to the 10% noninferiority margin. Although some bacteria were categorized as resistant to tested antibiotics, eradication was observed (for azithromycin: Acinetobacter, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas), highlighting the specific pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of the ocular route. CONCLUSIONS: In total, topical therapy with azithromycin 1.5% administered only twice daily for 3 days effectively eradicates most pathogenic bacteria associated with bacterial conjunctivitis. These microbiologic results are in accordance with the observed clinical outcome. This new anti-infective product has the advantage of a short treatment course which could lead to an improvement in patient compliance.

[Assessment of macular profile using optical coherence tomography after epiretinal membrane surgery]. / Analyse maculaire en tomographie à cohérence optique après chirurgie de membrane épirétinienne.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the quality and functional result of epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery using optical coherence tomography (OCT). PATIENTS AND METHOD: We conducted a retrospective, non comparative study between January 2004 and June 2006. Thirty-two eyes were included and operated by vitrectomy for ERM. The OCT assessment of the macular profile was evaluated postoperatively on day 8, day 30 and every 3 months thereafter. The first outcome measure was postoperative abnormality of the OCT profile. The secondary outcome measure was analysis of the functional result with macular thickness and best visual acuity. The Student t-test and the paired series comparison were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: After surgery, 23 eyes (72%) showed abnormality of the reflectivity signal as assessed by OCT. Only nine eyes (28%) had or showed restored foveal depression and normal macular thickness. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance was observed in 43.7% (14 eyes). The best visual acuity increased from 0.58+/-0.23 LogMar to 0.25+/-0.24 after ERM surgery (p<0.001). The macular thickness decreased from 374.6+/-78.7 microm to 271+/-44.6 microm postoperatively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Epiretinal membrane surgery is safe and effective in terms of the functional result but most cases do not recover normal microanatomy. This feature does not influence the functional result. Mechanical traction due to peeling of the epiretinal membrane associated with peeling of the internal limiting membrane may be the cause of these microanatomical results.