Ablation of cyclooxygenase-2 in forebrain neurons is neuroprotective and dampens brain inflammation after status epilepticus.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), a source of inflammatory mediators and a multifunctional neuronal modulator, is rapidly induced in select populations of cortical neurons after status epilepticus. The consequences of rapid activity-triggered induction of COX-2 in neurons have been the subject of much study and speculation. To address this issue directly, we created a mouse in which COX-2 is conditionally ablated in selected forebrain neurons. Results following pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus indicate that neuronal COX-2 promotes early neuroprotection and then delayed neurodegeneration of CA1 pyramidal neurons, promotes neurodegeneration of nearby somatostatin interneurons in the CA1 stratum oriens and dentate hilus (which themselves do not express COX-2), intensifies a broad inflammatory reaction involving numerous cytokines and other inflammatory mediators in the hippocampus, and is essential for development of a leaky blood-brain barrier after seizures. These findings point to a profound role of seizure-induced neuronal COX-2 expression in neuropathologies that accompany epileptogenesis.

Progress toward control of rubella and prevention of congenital rubella syndrome--worldwide, 2009.

Rubella, usually a mild rash illness in children and adults, can cause serious consequences when a pregnant woman is infected, particularly in early pregnancy. These serious consequences include miscarriage, fetal death or an infant born with birth defects (i.e., congenital rubella syndrome (CRS)). The primary purpose for rubella vaccination is the prevention of congenital rubella infection including CRS. Since 1969, several rubella virus vaccines have been licensed for use; however, until the 1990s, use of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) was limited primarily to developed countries. In 1996, it was estimated that 110,000 infants with CRS were born annually in developing countries. In 2000, the first World Health Organization rubella vaccine position paper was published to guide introduction of RCV in national childhood immunization schedules. From 1996 to 2009, the number of countries that introduced RCV into their national routine childhood immunization programs increased by 57% from 83 countries in 1996 to 130 countries in 2009. In addition, three of the six WHO regions established rubella control and CRS prevention goals: Region of the Americas and Europe rubella elimination by 2010 and 2015, respectively, and Western Pacific Region-accelerated rubella control and CRS prevention by 2015. Also, during this time period, the number of rubella cases reported decreased from 670,894 in 2000 to 121,344 in 2009. Rubella control and prevention of CRS can be accelerated by integrating with current global measles mortality reduction and regional elimination activities.

Poliomyelitis eradication: progress, challenges for the end game, and preparation for the post-eradication era.

In 1988, the World Health Assembly resolved to eradicate poliomyelitis globally by the year 2000. Dramatic progress toward this goal has occurred: three of the six WHO regions (Region of the Americas, European Region, and Western Pacific Region) are now polio free; and the number of polio-endemic countries decreased from over 125 in 1988 to 30 in 1999. Intensified efforts currently are underway to reach the target as soon as possible after 2000 in the three remaining polio-endemic WHO regions (African Region, Eastern Mediterranean Region, and South-East Asia Region). Even in polio-endemic regions, many countries are already polio free as the geographic extent of poliovirus shrinks while others. especially those experiencing conflict and war, pose substantial challenges to implementing the proven polio eradication strategies. Increasing attention and research now are devoted to the certification of polio eradication in the polio-free regions (that will include the first phase of implementing the Global Plan of Action for the laboratory containment of wild poliovirus) and formulating a policy for stopping all polio vaccination once eradication, containment, and global certification have been achieved. This report outlines the progress toward polio eradication and highlights some of the remaining issues and challenges that must be addressed before polio becomes a disease that future generations know only by history.

Possible global strategies for stopping polio vaccination and how they could be harmonized.

One of the challenges of the polio eradication initiative over the next few years will be the formulation of an optimal strategy for stopping poliovirus vaccination after global certification of polio eradication has been accomplished. This strategy must maximize the benefits and minimize the risks. A number of strategies are currently under consideration, including: (i) synchronized global discontinuation of use of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV); (ii) regional or subregional coordinated OPV discontinuation; and (iii) moving from trivalent to bivalent or monovalent OPV. Other options include moving from OPV to global use of IPV for an interim period before cessation of IPV use (to eliminate circulation of vaccine-derived poliovirus, if necessary) or development of new OPV strains that are not transmissible. Each of these strategies is associated with specific advantages (financial benefits for OPV discontinuation) and disadvantages (cost of switch to IPV) and inherent uncertainties (risk of continued poliovirus circulation in certain populations or prolonged virus replication in immunodeficient persons). An ambitious research agenda addresses the remaining questions and issues. Nevertheless, several generalities are already clear. Unprecedented collaboration between countries, regions, and indeed the entire world will be required to implement a global OPV discontinuation strategy Regulatory approval will be needed for an interim bivalent OPV or for monovalent OPV in many countries. Manufacturers will need sufficient lead time to produce sufficient quantities of IPV Finally, the financial implications for any of these strategies need to be considered. Whatever strategy is followed it will be necessary to stockpile supplies of a poliovirus-containing vaccine (most probably all three types of monovalent OPV), and to develop contingency plans to respond should an outbreak of polio occur after stopping vaccination.

When is a disease eradicable? 100 years of lessons learned.

Since the 1915 launch of the first international eradication initiative targeting a human pathogen, much has been learned about the determinants of eradicability of an organism. The authors outline the first 4 eradication efforts, summarizing the lessons learned in terms of the 3 types of criteria for disease eradication programs: (1) biological and technical feasibility, (2) costs and benefits, and (3) societal and political considerations.

Measles eradication: is it in our future?

Measles eradication would avert the current annual 1 million deaths and save the $1.5 billion in treatment and prevention costs due to measles in perpetuity. The authors evaluate the biological feasibility of eradicating measles according to 4 criteria: (1) the role of humans in maintaining transmission, (2) the availability of accurate diagnostic tests, (3) the existence of effective vaccines, and (4) the need to demonstrate elimination of measles from a large geographic area. Recent successes in interrupting measles transmission in the United States, most other countries in the Western Hemisphere, and selected countries in other regions provide evidence for the feasibility of global eradication. Potential impediments to eradication include (1) lack of political will in some industrialized countries, (2) transmission among adults, (3) increasing urbanization and population density, (4) the HIV epidemic, (5) waning immunity and the possibility of transmission from subclinical cases, and (6) risk of unsafe injections. Despite these challenges, a compelling case can be made in favor of measles eradication, and the authors believe that it is in our future. The question is when.

Disease eradication as a public health strategy: a case study of poliomyelitis eradication.

Disease eradication as a public health strategy was discussed at international meetings in 1997 and 1998. In this article, the ongoing poliomyelitis eradication initiative is examined using the criteria for evaluating candidate diseases for eradication proposed at these meetings, which covered costs and benefits, biological determinants of eradicability (technical feasibility) and societal and political considerations (operational feasibility). The benefits of poliomyelitis eradication are shown to include a substantial investment in health services delivery, the elimination of a major cause of disability, and far-reaching intangible effects, such as establishment of a "culture of prevention". The costs are found to be financial and finite, despite some disturbances to the delivery of other health services. The "technical" feasibility of poliomyelitis eradication is seen in the absence of a non-human reservoir and the presence of both an effective intervention and delivery strategy (oral poliovirus vaccine and national immunization days) and a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool (viral culture of specimens from acute flaccid paralysis cases). The certification of poliomyelitis eradication in the Americas in 1994 and interruption of endemic transmission in the Western Pacific since March 1997 confirm the operational feasibility of this goal. When the humanitarian, economic and consequent benefits of this initiative are measured against the costs, a strong argument is made for eradication as a valuable disease control strategy.

Poliovirus vaccines. Progress toward global poliomyelitis eradication and changing routine immunization recommendations in the United States.

Poliomyelitis prevention in the United States has relied virtually exclusively on OPV during the past 30 years. Starting in 1997, a major change in the poliomyelitis vaccination policy occurred, facilitated by substantial progress toward worldwide poliomyelitis eradication. A sequential schedule of IPV followed by OPV became the preferred means to prevent poliomyelitis, although an all-OPV and an all-IPV schedule were considered acceptable alternatives. In 1999, two doses of IPV were recommended to start the primary series, followed by two doses of either poliovirus vaccine. As of January 2000, an all-IPV schedule is currently being implemented in the United States for routine childhood vaccination. Several unusual features are associated with the major public health policy change from an all-OPV to a sequential schedule, including (1) the process of involving a neutral party (i.e., the IOM); (2) the perceived concerns expressed before the change in policy with regard to provider and parent compliance, which could affect the hard-earned gains in raising immunization coverage rates; (3) the ethical issues surrounding the change (e.g., societal versus individual protection) and the influence that a single case of VAPP may have on national policy; (4) the relative lack of importance of cost-effectiveness data; and (5) the weight of progress in the global polio eradication initiative spurring the change in the United States and, increasingly, in other industrialized countries. The IOM assisted in the evaluation of the national poliomyelitis vaccination policy in 1977 and again in 1988. The 1988 review recommended that a sequential IPV-OPV schedule be considered at such time that a combination vaccine becomes available. Also, the IOM raised several important questions. Extensive research to address the questions raised by the IOM had been conducted so that, in 1996, more data were available for the decision-making process. The primary reasons for the change in vaccination policy were (1) the continued occurrence of VAPP in the absence of indigenously acquired wildtype poliovirus-associated paralytic disease, (2) the reduced risk for importation and spread of wild-type poliovirus caused by the progress of the global polio eradication initiative, (3) evidence from vaccine trials that combined IPV-OPV schedules are safe and immunogenic, and (4) maintenance of high levels of population immunity to poliovirus. The global effect of a national change in poliomyelitis vaccination policy was also considered in this policy-making process. Some members of the public health and medical communities raised objections that an increased reliance on IPV in the United States could lead other countries, especially developing countries, to inappropriately abandon OPV and increase reliance on IPV for routine vaccination. Experience from the global smallpox eradication campaign indicated that this scenario was unlikely. The United States ceased vaccinating against smallpox in 1971, 6 years before smallpox was eliminated from the world, without jeopardizing the global smallpox campaign. Subsequently, the effect on the global eradication initiative has been negligible. This article illustrates the potential discrepancy between expressed theoretic concerns about the number of injections and the actual practice once vaccination policy recommendations become the standard of care and that appropriate training and education can overcome these initial concerns. The authors found that compliance with the recommended use of IPV for the first and second doses as part of the sequential schedule was high, independent of socioeconomic status and ethnicity. The need for additional injections did not present a barrier to completion of the recommended childhood immunization schedule. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Invited commentary: vaccine failure or failure to vaccinate?

PIP: Despite the availability of safe and effective measles vaccines since 1963, measles still accounts for approximately 10% of global mortality from all causes among children aged less than 5 years, an estimated 36.5 million cases and 1 million deaths in 1996. Worldwide in 1996, routine coverage with 1 dose of measles vaccine was 81%, although the African Region of the World Health Organization reports the lowest coverage, at 56%, and the largest proportion of measles cases and deaths. There is an urgent need to strengthen measles control and explore the best ways to achieve that end, especially in areas such as West Africa. However, the data presented by Cisse et al. do not show that the 1995 outbreak of measles in Niakhar, Senegal, was due mainly to the waning of vaccine-induced immunity among school-aged children. Waning immunity therefore cannot be used to justify the introduction of a multidose vaccination schedule as a key strategy for improving measles control in developing countries. The authors explain the basis for their opinions. The immediate objective of any measles control program should be to provide a first dose of measles vaccine to unvaccinated children.^ieng

Risk of chronic arthropathy among women after rubella vaccination. Vaccine Safety Datalink Team.

CONTEXT: A review by the Institute of Medicine found a possible relationship between rubella vaccination and chronic arthritis among women. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of persistent joint and neurologic symptoms in rubella seronegative women subsequently vaccinated with RA 27/3 rubella vaccine. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study based on computerized laboratory data and medical record review. Records were reviewed for symptoms occurring within 2 years before and after the date of serological testing and to identify vaccinees. Possible cases were evaluated by a rheumatologist blinded to serological findings and vaccination status. SETTING: Large health maintenance organization in northern California. PATIENTS: Women aged 15 to 59 years serotested for rubella during 1990 with continuous health plan membership for 2 years before and after the date of their serological test. Seronegative women immunized within 1 year of serotesting (n=971) were defined as exposed. Primary comparison groups included all unvaccinated, seronegative women (n=924) and randomly selected seropositive, unvaccinated women (n=2421) matched to exposed subjects on serological test date and age (+/-3 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and incidence of chronic joint and neurologic symptoms during 1-year follow-up period stratified by age and serological findings, immunization, and postpartum status. RESULTS: No significantly increased risk was associated with receipt of rubella vaccine for any outcome except for prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in vaccinated women at least 30 years old compared with seropositive, unvaccinated women (2.9% vs 1.4%; P=.03). A total of 34 women had onset of conditions within the 1-year follow-up period; 9 of these were in the group of seronegative, immunized women, of whom 6 had onset of symptoms within 6 weeks of vaccination. Among these 6 women, symptoms included transient arthritis or arthralgias (<6 weeks duration) in 4 women, arthralgia of indeterminate chronicity in 1 woman, and carpal tunnel syndrome in 1 woman. Postpartum women across all groups were less likely to be seen for nontraumatic arthropathies than nonpostpartum women (4.5% vs 7.2%, P=.08 in vaccinated women; 4.8% vs 8.1%, P=.09 in seronegative controls; and 4.8% vs 10.0%, P=.01 in seropositive controls). CONCLUSIONS: In this large retrospective cohort analysis there was no evidence of any increased risk of new onset chronic arthropathies or neurologic conditions in women receiving the RA 27/3 rubella vaccine. These data support the continued vaccination of rubella-susceptible women to reduce the risk of congenital rubella syndrome.

Outbreak of poliomyelitis in Gizan, Saudi Arabia: cocirculation of wild type 1 polioviruses from three separate origins.

In 1989, a localized outbreak of 10 cases of poliomyelitis occurred in Saudi Arabia. Wild poliovirus type 1 was isolated from 5 patients. To determine the patterns of poliovirus circulation, partial nucleotide sequences of the poliovirus isolates were compared. These isolates were remarkably diverse. Two isolates were closely related to each other and to viruses isolated during the 1988 epidemic in Oman. Two other isolates were very similar to viruses found in Egypt. The fifth isolate was distantly related to the latter pair. The molecular data suggest that the 10 cases represented three separate outbreaks. The virologic findings underscore the potential for Saudi Arabia, which receives millions of guest workers and their families each year from countries in which polio is endemic, to be exposed to frequent importations of wild polioviruses. To restrict the circulation of imported polioviruses, Saudi Arabia must maintain high population immunity to poliovirus in all geopolitical divisions.