Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 134(1): 90-8, 2007 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17599491

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve is the most common etiologic factor associated with clinically significant aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation in pediatric patients. Beyond infancy, surgical intervention typically involves valve repair with cusp thinning and commissurotomy or valve replacement, primarily with pulmonary autograft in the current era. An aortic valve repair technique using tricuspidization with cusp extension was introduced in 1999. This study compares the midterm clinical outcome in patients undergoing valve repair by tricuspidization with cusp extension with those receiving a pulmonary autograft (Ross). METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on all consecutive patients with symptomatic bicuspid aortic valve disease who underwent tricuspidization with cusp extension or a Ross procedure between 1999 and 2005. In both groups, all patients were at least 1 year of age at time of the operation. RESULTS: During this period, 21 children (median age 12.6 years, range 2.6-18 years) underwent tricuspidization with cusp extension (TCE group) and 25 children (median age 10.2 years, range 11.5 months-20.1 years) underwent the Ross procedure. Prior balloon valvuloplasty was performed in 5 (24%) of the children in the TCE group and 16 (64%) of the children in the Ross group. Prior surgical commissurotomy was performed in 4 (19%) TCE patients and in 9 (36%) Ross patients. During a median follow-up period of 36.4 months (range 2.5 months-7.4 years), 2 (10%) patients in the TCE group required valve-preserving early revision of the repair, 2 (10%) TCE patients required subsequent aortic valve replacement at 16 and 33 months, 1 (4%) Ross patient required subsequent valve repair at 5 years, and 1 (4%) Ross patient underwent cardiac transplantation at 46 months. At 36 months, the actuarial freedom from reintervention on the aortic valve or autograft was 90% in the TCE group, with 11 patients at risk, and 100% in Ross patients, with 13 patients at risk (P = .39); the freedom from moderate valve dysfunction or reintervention was 66% for TCE patients and 95% for Ross patients (P = .07). There were no deaths, and all but 1 Ross patient remain in New York Heart Association class I. CONCLUSIONS: Reintervention rates in patients undergoing tricuspidization with cusp extension or a primary Ross procedure are similar. Valve performance in the TCE group is satisfactory at midterm follow-up, but the Ross repair appears to provide greater stability of valve function. These results suggest that repair with valve tricuspidization and cusp extension provides reliable palliation of the symptomatic bicuspid aortic valve.


Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/anormalidades , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Pulmonar/transplante , Adolescente , Adulto , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Criança , Intervalos de Confiança , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Autólogo
2.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 132(1): 66-71, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16798304

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although homograft conduits are frequently used to establish right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery continuity, the limited availability of small-size homografts is a significant constraint in pediatric cardiac surgery. We compared the performance of standard homograft conduits with that of surgically reduced bicuspid homograft conduits in patients undergoing repair of truncus arteriosus. METHODS: Forty infants undergoing complete repair of truncus arteriosus with either standard homografts (n = 26) or reduced-size bicuspid homografts (n = 14) were evaluated. RESULTS: The median downsized conduit diameter (13 mm) was similar to the standard homograft diameter (12 mm, P = .52). There were 6 early deaths and 5 late deaths, representing an overall 30-day mortality of 15% and a 5-year mortality of 25%. No deaths were directly related to homograft dysfunction. Four (29%) downsized conduits and 8 (31%) standard conduits required replacement at a median interval of 18.5 months and 42.4 months, respectively. Catheter-based interventions were required in 5 (36%) patients in the downsized group and in 3 (12%) patients in the standard group. There was no difference in freedom from surgical or catheter-based reintervention between the 2 groups (P = .42). Freedom from conduit failure (severe conduit stenosis, moderate or greater regurgitation) was 55.9% and 17.2% at 3 years in the downsized and standard groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The surgically downsized homograft is an excellent option when an appropriate-sized homograft is not available and might prevent morbidity associated with the use of an oversized conduit.


Assuntos
Implante de Prótese Vascular , Prótese Vascular , Artéria Pulmonar/cirurgia , Persistência do Tronco Arterial/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Cateterismo , Parada Cardíaca Induzida , Ventrículos do Coração/cirurgia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Desenho de Prótese , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante Homólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...