Determinants of undercarboxylated and carboxylated osteocalcin concentrations in type 1 diabetes.

UNLABELLED: To determine whether undercarboxylated osteocalcin (UC-OC) or gamma-carboxyglutamic-carboxylated-type osteocalcin (GLA-OC) concentrations deviate from normal in type 1 diabetes (T1D), serum levels were compared between 115 subjects with T1D and 55 age-matched healthy controls. UC-OC and GLA-OC concentrations were similar between groups; however, in T1D, UC-OC correlated positively with markers of insulin exposure, either endogenously produced or exogenously administered. INTRODUCTION: A study was conducted to determine whether dysregulation of circulating concentrations of UC-OC or GLA-OC occurs in patients with type 1 diabetes, a condition of insulin deficiency without insulin resistance. METHODS: We measured serum concentrations of UC-OC and GLA-OC in 115 subjects with T1D, ages 14-40 years, and in 55 age-matched healthy control subjects. Relationships between UC-OC and GLA-OC concentrations and patient characteristics (gender and age), indices of glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, C-peptide concentration, 3-day average glucose measured by a continuous glucose sensor, total daily insulin dose) and circulating indices of skeletal homeostasis (total calcium, 25-OH vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), type 1 collagen degradation fragments (CTX), adiponectin, leptin) were examined. Between group differences in the concentrations of UC-OC and GLA-OC were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Although adiponectin levels were higher in the T1D group, between-group comparisons did not reveal statistically significant differences in concentration of UC-OC, GLA-OC, CTX or leptin between the T1D and control populations. Instead, by multivariate regression modeling, UC-OC was correlated with younger age (p < 0.001), higher CTX (p < 0.001), lower HbA1c (p = 0.013), and higher IGF-1 (p = 0.086). Moreover, within the T1D subgroup, UC-OC was positively correlated with C-peptide/glucose ratio (reflecting endogenous insulin secretion), with IGF-1 (reflecting intra-portal insulin sufficiency), and with total daily insulin dose. CONCLUSIONS: In T1D, UC-OC appears to correlate positively with markers of insulin exposure, either endogenously produced or exogenously administered.

Common allergens in avian meats.

BACKGROUND: Reports of allergy to bird meats are uncommon, and most have been in patients with "bird-egg syndrome." OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate 3 patients who reported allergic reactions to several avian meats, but who denied allergic reactions to eating eggs. The patients required yellow fever vaccine for entry into the military. METHODS: Patients were skin tested with commercial extracts of chicken, turkey, and egg, as well as with crude extracts made from dove and quail meat, and with yellow fever vaccine. Immunoblots for IgE antibody were performed by using the same materials used for skin testing plus extracts of duck and goose meat. RESULTS: Skin tests were positive in all 3 patients to chicken, turkey, dove, quail, and yellow fever vaccine and negative to egg. This included some positive skin test responses to bird meats the patients denied ever having eaten. The vaccine was administered in graded doses. Immunoblots revealed IgE binding to several proteins of similar molecular weights in all of the avian meats but not to egg or yellow fever vaccine. Again, this included IgE antibody to some bird meats the patients denied ever having eaten. CONCLUSION: Patients allergic to one bird meat may be allergic to others, including game birds, probably because of cross-reacting allergens. Such patients may have to exercise caution even when eating bird meats they have not previously ingested. The relationship of this allergy to yellow fever vaccine, if any, remains to be determined.