A comparison of virulence patterns and in vivo fitness between hospital- and community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus related to the USA400 clone.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates genetically related to the CA-MRSA clone MW2/USA400 (ST1-SCCmecIV lineage) from the United States have emerged in hospitals in Rio de Janeiro and are associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections. To understand the virulence mechanisms involved in the adaptability of ST1 isolates as a hospital pathogen in Rio de Janeiro, we compared the virulence traits and fitness properties of the Brazilian isolates with those displayed by the CA-MRSA isolates from the United States. Similar to the USA400 from the United States, all the Brazilian isolates tested carried the genes encoding SEH and LukDE. In contrast, none of the Brazilian isolates carried the lukSF PVL, sea, sec, and sek genes. Competition experiments in mice demonstrated a significant increase in the fitness for the CA-MRSA isolates MW2 and USA400-0051 from the United States compared to other isolates. In the foreign body animal model, 83 % more North-American bacterial cells were recovered compared to the Brazilian ST1 isolates. Differences in gene expression of important virulence factors were detected. Transcription of rnaIII and psmα3 was increased about two-fold in the isolates from the United States, and sasG about two-fold in the Brazilian isolates. Thus, it is possible that the virulence attenuation observed among the Brazilian hospital isolates, associated with the acquisition of multiple resistant determinants, are consequences of microevolutionary events that contributed to the necessary fitness adjustment of this lineage, allowing a typically community-acquired MRSA (MW2/USA400) to emerge as a successful hospital pathogen (Brazilian ST1-SCCmecIV).

Restriction modification (RM) tests associated to additional molecular markers for screening prevalent MRSA clones in Brazil.

In this study, we associated the restriction modification (RM) tests to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of molecular markers (SCCmec III, seh, agr II-SCCmec IV, and lukSF) for revealing the main methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones circulating in Brazil. This simple and rapid approach allowed a precise classification of the MRSA analyzed when compared with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) data.

Biofilm formation and prevalence of lukF-pv, seb, sec and tst genes among hospital- and community-acquired isolates of some international methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineages.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important nosocomial agent of biopolymer-associated infections, and isolates of S. aureus can produce different virulence factors, including potent toxins. The biofilm formation and accumulation by certain international MRSA lineages were analysed, and the toxic shock syndrome-associated genes (tst, seb and sec) among these isolates were assessed. In addition, the presence of lukF-pv (encoding the F-subunit of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)) was investigated. Most of the MRSA isolates tested were capable of forming biofilm on polystyrene surfaces, but lacked the superantigen toxin genes that were tested. PVL was rarely detected among the hospital isolates analysed.

Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disseminated in a home care system.

OBJECTIVE: To study colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a home care service during a 4-month period. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: A home care service located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to the home care service during this period, their household contacts, and health care workers (HCWs). METHODS: Swab specimens from the anterior nares were collected from each patient in the 3 groups at admission. Screening was repeated every 7 days. MRSA was detected using a mecA probe, and the clonality of isolates was evaluated by molecular methods, primarily pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: Of the 59 study patients, 9 (15.3%) had MRSA colonization detected; these cases of colonization were classified as imported. Only 1 (2.0%) of the 50 patients not colonized at admission became an MRSA carrier (this case of colonization was classified as autochthonous). Two (0.9%) of 224 household contacts and 16 (7.4%) of 217 HCWs had MRSA colonization. Cross-transmission from patient to HCW could be clearly demonstrated in 8 cases. The great majority of MRSA isolates belonged to the Brazilian epidemic clone. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA colonization was common in the home care service analyzed. The fact that the majority of MRSA isolates obtained were primarily of nosocomial origin (and belonged to the so-called Brazilian epidemic clone) substantiated our findings that all but 1 patient had already been colonized before admission to the home care service. Only cross-transmission from patients to healthcare workers could be verified. On the basis of these results, we believe that a control program built on admission screening of patients for detection of MRSA carriage could contribute to the overall quality of care.

Detection and molecular characterization of a gentamicin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clone in Rio de Janeiro that resembles the New York/Japanese clone.

Staphylococcus aureus is the leading cause of hospital-acquired infections in many countries, and multiple factors contribute to the ability of these bacteria to disseminate and spread in hospitals. In Brazil it has been demonstrated that a multiresistant methicillin-resistant S. aureus clone, the so-called Brazilian epidemic clone, is widespread geographically. This clone was first detected in 1992 in Brazil, and recently from many other countries within South America, Europe and Asia. The study describes the detection of a gentamicin-susceptible heterogeneous MRSA clone that resembles another MRSA clone widely spread in US and Japanese hospitals, and supports the premise that the detection of heterogeneous MRSA isolates by some recommended methods is a challenging task that may, occasionally, result in MRSA misidentification.