Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Burn Care Res ; 29(5): 790-7, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18695604

RESUMO

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), particularly USA300, is a major pathogen in the outpatient setting. We suspected that USA300 had been introduced into our burn-trauma unit (BTU) when three burn patients presented with numerous simultaneous abscesses. We did molecular typing on 206 MRSA isolates from all patients on the BTU who had MRSA isolated from either nares cultures or clinical specimens obtained between April 11, 2002 and October 24, 2006. We reviewed medical records for all patients who had USA300 and for 75 control patients. Twenty-five of 206 (12.1%) patients who were colonized (n = 3) or infected (n = 22) with MRSA had USA300. Thirteen patients had abscesses drained surgically and eight had necrotizing fasciitis excised. Seven patients had burns (mean burn size 11.8 +/- 3.4%), of who four (66.7%) acquired numerous simultaneous (3-33) abscesses. Fourteen patients acquired USA300 outside of the BTU, and three acquired this strain on the BTU. Cases were more likely to have been hospitalized or to have had an operation in the 6 months before they were hospitalized than were controls (P = .001 for both). To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe numerous simultaneous MRSA abscesses in burn patients. The MRSA strain USA300 may be introduced onto burn units from the community by patients admitted with skin and soft tissue infections, especially abscesses and necrotizing fasciitis. Burn patients may be at risk for numerous abscesses with USA300, because they have open wounds and their immune systems may be compromised.


Assuntos
Queimaduras/complicações , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Centros de Traumatologia , Abscesso/etiologia , Abscesso/microbiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Queimaduras/tratamento farmacológico , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Fasciite Necrosante/microbiologia , Humanos , Iowa/epidemiologia , Prontuários Médicos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 46(3): 680-8, 2002 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11850248

RESUMO

The in vitro activities of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin against a large collection of clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 4,650) obtained over a 5-year period, 1994-1995 through 1999-2000, were assessed as part of a longitudinal multicenter U.S. surveillance study of antimicrobial resistance. Three sampling periods were used during this investigation, the winter seasons of 1994-1995, 1997-1998, and 1999-2000; and 1,523, 1,596 and 1,531 isolates were collected during these three periods, respectively. The overall rank order of activity of the four fluoroquinolones examined in this study was moxifloxacin > gatifloxacin > levofloxacin = ciprofloxacin, in which moxifloxacin (MIC at which 90% of isolates are inhibited [MIC(90)], 0.25 microg/ml; modal MIC, 0.12 microg/ml) was twofold more active than gatifloxacin (MIC(90), 0.5 microg/ml; modal MIC, 0.25 microg/ml), which in turn was fourfold more active than either levofloxacin (MIC(90), 1 microg/ml; modal MIC, 1 microg/ml) or ciprofloxacin (MIC(90), 2 microg/ml; modal MIC, 1 microg/ml). Changes in the in vitro activities of fluoroquinolones against S. pneumoniae strains in the United States over the 5-year period of the survey were assessed by comparing the MIC frequency distributions of the study drugs against the isolates obtained during the three sampling periods encompassing this investigation. These comparisons revealed no evidence of changes in the in vitro activities of the fluoroquinolones. In addition, the percentages of isolates in the three sampling periods for which MICs were above the resistance breakpoints were compared. Low percentages of resistant strains were detected, and there was no evidence of resistance rate changes over time. For example, by use of a ciprofloxacin MIC of > or = 4 microg/ml to define resistance, the proportions of isolates from the three sampling periods for which MICs were at or above this breakpoint were 1.2, 1.6, and 1.4%, respectively. A total of 164 unique isolates (n = 58 from 1994-1995, 65 from 1997-1998, and 42 from 1999-2000) were examined for evidence of mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of the parC and the gyrA genes. Forty-nine isolates harbored at least one mutation in the QRDRs of one or both genes (1994-1995, n = 15; 1997-1998, n = 19; 1999-2000, n = 15). Among the 4,650 isolates of S. pneumoniae examined in the study, we estimated that 0.3% had mutations in both the parC and gyrA loci. The majority of mutations (67.3% of the mutations in 49 isolates with mutations) were amino acid substitutions in the parC locus only. Four isolates had a mutation in the gyrA locus only, and 12 isolates had mutations in both genes (8.2 and 24.5% of isolates with mutations, respectively). There was no significant difference in the number of isolates with parC and/or gyrA mutations detected during each study period. Finally, because of the magnitude of the study, we had reasonably large numbers of pneumococcal isolates with genotypically defined mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance and were thus able to determine the effects of specific resistance mutations on the activities of different fluoroquinolones. In general, isolates with mutations in parC only were resistant to ciprofloxacin but remained susceptible to levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, whereas isolates with mutations in gyrA only and isolates with mutations in both parC and gyrA were resistant to all four fluoroquinolones tested.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Substituição de Aminoácidos/genética , DNA Girase/genética , DNA Topoisomerase IV/genética , DNA Bacteriano/análise , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Fluoroquinolonas , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções Pneumocócicas/microbiologia , Reserpina/farmacologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...