Placement of Endovascular Stent for Reperfusion of Cerebral Infarct After Pediatric Traumatic Internal Carotid Artery Dissection.

Background: Traumatic intracranial ICA dissections are not commonly seen in children. Dissection resulting in perfusion deficit warrants intervention. Here we encountered a patient who experienced traumatic ICA dissection, treated by endovascular stenting. Methods: A 10-year-old female presented with aphasia and right sided weakness following trauma. Imaging showed deficit in the left MCA territory without core. Further imaging showed dissection of the left supraclinoid ICA, confirmed by digital subtraction angiography. Results: A Neuroform Atlas stent was placed without complication. All dysarthria and weakness had resolved on follow-up 5 months post-stenting. Conclusions: Acute stroke symptoms in children can result in lasting deficits if not treated quickly. Medical management is regarded to be first line, depending on presentation. Endovascular stenting may provide a promising means to treat pediatric ICA dissections involving perfusion deficits and mitigate permanent ischemic changes.

Mechanistic insights gained from cell and molecular analysis of the neuroprotective potential of bioactive natural compounds in an immortalized hippocampal cell line.

Evaluating novel compounds for neuroprotective effects in animal models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a protracted, labor-intensive and costly effort. However, the present lack of effective treatment options for TBI, despite decades of research, shows the critical need for alternative methods for screening new drug candidates with neuroprotective properties. Because natural products have been a leading source of new therapeutic agents for human diseases, we used an in vitro model of stretch injury to rapidly assess pro-survival effects of three bioactive compounds, two isolated from natural products (clovanemagnolol [CM], vinaxanthone [VX]) and the third, a dietary compound (pterostilbene [PT]) found in blueberries. The stretch injury experiments were not used to validate drug efficacy in a comprehensive manner but used primarily, as proof-of-principle, to demonstrate that the neuroprotective potential of each bioactive agent can be quickly assessed in an immortalized hippocampal cell line in lieu of comprehensive testing in animal models of TBI. To gain mechanistic insights into potential molecular mechanisms of neuroprotective effects, we performed a pathway-specific PCR array analysis of the effects of CM on the rat hippocampus and microRNA sequencing analysis of the effects of VX and PT on cultured hippocampal progenitor neurons. We show that the neuroprotective properties of these natural compounds are associated with altered expression of several genes or microRNAs that have functional roles in neurodegeneration or cell survival. Our approach could help in quickly assessing multiple natural products for neuroprotective properties and expedite the process of new drug discovery for TBI therapeutics.

Effect of an additional neurosurgical resident on procedure length, operating room time, estimated blood loss, and post-operative length-of-stay.

Introduction: Neurosurgical residency training is costly, with expenses largely borne by the academic institutions that train residents. One expense is increased operative duration, which leads to poorer patient outcomes. Although other studies have assessed the effect of one resident assisting, none have investigated two residents; thus, we sought to investigate if two residents versus one scrubbed-in impacted operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and length-of-stay (LOS).Methods: In this retrospective review of patients who underwent a neurosurgical procedure involving one or two residents between January 2013 and April 2016, we performed multivariable linear regression to determine if there was an association between resident participation and case length, operating room time, EBL, and LOS. We also included patient demographics, attending surgeon, day of the week, start time, pre-operative LOS, procedure performed, and other variables in our model. Only procedures performed at least 40 times during the study period were analyzed.Results: Of 860 procedures that met study criteria, 492 operations were one of six procedures performed at least 40 times, which were anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt insertion, CSF shunt revision, lumbar laminectomy, intracranial hematoma evacuation, and non-skull base, supratentorial parenchymal brain tumor resection. An additional resident was associated with a 35.1-min decrease (p = .01) in operative duration for lumbar laminectomies. However, for intracranial hematoma evacuations, an extra resident was associated with a 24.1 min increase (p = .03) in procedural length. There were no significant differences observed in the other four surgeries.Conclusion: An additional resident may lengthen duration of intracranial hematoma evacuations. However, two residents scrubbed-in were associated with decreased lumbar laminectomy duration. Overall, an extra resident does not increase procedural duration, total operating room utilization, EBL, or post-operative LOS. Allowing two residents to scrub in may be a safe and cost-effective method of educating neurosurgical residents.

A Systematic Review of Ion Radiotherapy in Maintaining Local Control Regarding Atypical and Anaplastic Meningiomas.

OBJECTIVE: Atypical and anaplastic meningiomas, unlike their benign counterparts, are highly aggressive, locally destructive, and likely to recur after treatment. These diseases are difficult to definitively treat with traditional radiotherapy without injuring adjacent brain parenchyma. The physical properties of ion radiotherapy allows for treatment plans that avoid damaging critical neural structures. The objectives of this systematic review were to evaluate the use and efficacy of ion radiotherapy in the treatment of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature by querying the PubMed and Ovid databases to identify and examine literature addressing the efficacy of ion radiotherapy in maintaining long-term local tumor control for patients with atypical or anaplastic meningiomas. The outcome of interest was rate of local tumor control at 5 years after ion radiotherapy. RESULTS: Across the included studies, proton therapy delivered a mean local control rate of 59.62% after 5 years. Carbon ion radiotherapy studies showed local control rates of 95% and 63% at 2 years for grade II and III meningiomas, respectively. In contrast, carbon ion radiotherapy studies that failed to differentiate between atypical and anaplastic meningiomas produced a local control rate of 33% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy maintain comparable rates of local control to conventional photon therapy and allow for more targeted treatment plans that may limit excess radiation damage. Although additional prospective trials are needed, ion therapy represents a burgeoning field in the treatment of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas.

Cefazolin versus vancomycin for neurosurgical operative prophylaxis - A single institution retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Cefazolin and vancomycin are common choices for neurosurgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. Cefazolin is typically first-line due to its lower toxicity profile and specificity for gram-positives such as skin commensals, while vancomycin is often reserved for patients with cephalosporin or penicillin allergies. However, one randomized clinical trial demonstrated superiority of vancomycin for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt insertions at a hospital with a high prevalence of methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We aimed to evaluate the association of prophylaxis choice and incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) at our own institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent a neurosurgical operation from January 2013 to April 2016 at one particular hospital belonging to our institution. We included patients who received either only cefazolin or only vancomycin as their pre-incisional prophylaxis. Vancomycin was substituted for cefazolin in patients with known penicillin or cephalosporin allergy. Procedures requiring multiple attending surgeons were excluded. We defined a SSI as a confirmed culture isolated from the wound, implant (if pertinent), or CSF (if pertinent) within a year of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with consideration of antibiotic, operation performed, wound class, and procedure length. RESULTS: A total of 859 operations met study criteria; 664 patients received Cefazolin, and 195 received Vancomycin. We identified 22 SSIs, with 14 in the cefazolin (2.2%) and 8 in the vancomycin (4.1%) group. Upon logistic regression, there was no significant association of vancomycin substitution with incidence of SSIs between the two groups (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.42-6.00, p = .49). In the cefazolin group, 8/14 cultures were positive for S. aureus compared to 1/8 of the vancomycin group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in neurosurgical site infection incidence when vancomycin prophylaxis was substituted for cefazolin. S. aureus was isolated from patients who received cefazolin at a higher rate although this was not statistically significant. At our institution, S. aureus makes up 36% of isolated organisms from inpatient and intensive care units. Institutions should consider their own investigations into local antibiograms, SSI rates, and choice of prophylaxis.