Percutaneous coronary intervention versus optimal medical therapy for stable coronary artery disease: An umbrella review.

Background: Invasive management of stable coronary artery disease is still a controversial topic. The purpose of this umbrella review was to synthesize systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluate the benefits and harms of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from 2018 to August 7, 2022. We included SRs with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the question of interest. We assessed the methodological quality of the SRs with the AMSTAR-2 tool. We summarized the results of the outcomes for each SR. We calculated the degree of overlap of the RCTs included in the SRs using the corrected covered area (CCA). Results: We found 10 SRs with meta-analyses. The SRs included 3 to 15 RCTs. The degree of overlap among the SRs was very high (CCA > 15%). No SR evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE system and 9 out of 10 had critically low methodological quality. The SRs reported heterogeneous results for the outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and angina. On the other hand, for the outcomes of cardiovascular mortality and stroke, all SRs agreed that there were no differences between PCI and OMT alone. Conclusions: We found 10 SRs on the use of PCI compared to OMT alone for patients with stable coronary artery disease. However, none had high methodological quality, none evaluated the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach, and the results were inconsistent for several outcomes. This variability in evidence may result in divergent clinical decisions for the management of stable coronary artery disease among healthcare professionals. It is necessary to perform a high-quality SR using the GRADE approach to clarify the balance of benefits and harms of PCI.

[Knowledge about COVID-19 and correct mask use in workers at a Peruvian university during the pandemic]. / Conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y uso correcto de mascarilla en trabajadores de una universidad de Perú durante la pandemia: estudio transversal.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic led to massive use of personal protective equipment (PPE). However, evidence on the frequency of appropriate use is sparse. In this study, we evaluated the level of knowledge about COVID-19 and biosafety measures, and the frequency of correct use of masks in workers at a university in Lima, Peru. METHODS: Cross-sectional study conducted in a population of 109 workers of a private university who were physically onsite. We used a structured questionnaire to measure knowledge of COVID-19, together with use of and training in PPE. In addition, we explored factors associated with the correct use of masks and an adequate level of knowledge about COVID-19 and related biosafety measurSpain. Results were expressed as prevalence, using student's T-test and Pearson chi-square tests. RESULTS: We evaluated 82 workers, 35.4% of whom showed an adequate level of knowledge about COVID-19 and biosafety measurSpain. Younger participants and those who regularly washed their hands at work had an adequate level of knowledge, with 90.2% of these reporting correct use of their masks. Workers in general service areas or with a low level of education reported less frequent correct use of their mask compared to those who did not have these characteristics.  Conclusion: We found a low level of knowledge about COVID-19 and biosafety measures among the workers of a private university; a higher level of education was associated with a greater prevalence of correct mask use. Training programs by work areas are needed, to improve biosafety practices among workers.

Introducción: La pandemia por la COVID-19 llevó al uso masivo de equipos de protección individual (EPI). Sin embargo, la evidencia sobre la frecuencia de su uso adecuado es escasa. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el nivel de conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y medidas de bioseguridad, y la frecuencia de uso correcto de mascarilla en los trabajadores de una universidad en Lima, Perú, durante la pandemia. Métodos: Estudio transversal realizado en los 109 trabajadores de una universidad privada que se encontraban en modalidad presencial entre junio y septiembre 2021. Se utilizó un cuestionario estructurado. Se estimaron las prevalencias del nivel de conocimiento y uso correcto de EPIs, y los factores asociados mediante la T student y Chi-2 de Pearson.  Resultados: Participaron en total 82 trabajadores (75%). El 35% mostró un adecuado nivel de conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y medidas de bioseguridad. Los más jóvenes y los que se lavaban las manos en el trabajo mostraron un mayor conocimiento, refiriendo el 90% utilizar correctamente su mascarilla. Los trabajadores de áreas de servicios generales o con bajo nivel de educación refirieron un menor uso correcto de su mascarilla.  Conclusión: El nivel de conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y las medidas de bioseguridad entre los trabajadores de una universidad privada fue bajo y el nivel de educación se mostró inversamente asociado al uso correcto de mascarilla. Es necesario implementar programas de capacitación por áreas de trabajo para mejorar las prácticas de bioseguridad en los trabajadorSpain.

Conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y uso correcto de mascarilla en trabajadores de una universidad de Perú durante la pandemia: estudio transversal / Knowledge about COVID-19 and correct mask use in workers at a Peruvian university during the pandemic

Introducción: La pandemia por la COVID-19 llevó al uso masivo de equipos de protección individual (EPI). Sin embargo, la evidencia sobre la frecuencia de su uso adecuado es escasa. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el nivel de conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y medidas de bioseguridad, y la frecuencia de uso correcto de mascarilla en los trabajadores de una universidad en Lima, Perú, durante la pandemia.Métodos: Estudio transversal realizado en los 109 trabajadores de una universidad privada que se encontraban en modalidad presencial entre junio y septiembre 2021. Se utilizó un cuestionario estructurado. Se estimaron las prevalencias del nivel de conocimiento y uso correcto de EPIs, y los factores asociados mediante la T student y Chi-2 de Pearson. Resultados: Participaron en total 82 trabajadores (75%). El 35% mostró un adecuado nivel de conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y medidas de bioseguridad. Los más jóvenes y los que se lavaban las manos en el trabajo mostraron un mayor conocimiento, refiriendo el 90% utilizar correctamente su mascarilla. Los trabajadores de áreas de servicios generales o con bajo nivel de educación refirieron un menor uso correcto de su mascarilla. Conclusión: El nivel de conocimiento sobre la COVID-19 y las medidas de bioseguridad entre los trabajadores de una universidad privada fue bajo y el nivel de educación se mostró inversamente asociado al uso correcto de mascarilla. Es necesario implementar programas de capacitación por áreas de trabajo para mejorar las prácticas de bioseguridad en los trabajadores. (AU)

ntroduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to massive use of personal protective equipment (PPE). However, evidence on the frequency of appropriate use is sparse. In this study, we evaluated the level of knowledge about COVID-19 and biosafety measures, and the frequen-cy of correct use of masks in workers at a university in Lima, Peru.Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted in a population of 109 workers of a private uni-versity who were physically onsite. We used a structured questionnaire to measure knowl-edge of COVID-19, together with use of and training in PPE. In addition, we explored fac-tors associated with the correct use of masks and an adequate level of knowledge about COVID-19 and related biosafety measures. Results were expressed as prevalence, using student’s T-test and Pearson chi-square tests.Results: We evaluated 82 workers, 35.4% of whom showed an adequate level of knowledge about COVID-19 and biosafety measures. Younger participants and those who regularly washed their hands at work had an adequate level of knowledge, with 90.2% of these re-porting correct use of their masks. Workers in general service areas or with a low level of education reported less frequent correct use of their mask compared to those who did not have these characteristics. Conclusion: We found a low level of knowledge about COVID-19 and biosafety measures among the workers of a private university; a higher level of education was associated with a greater prevalence of correct mask use. Training programs by work areas are needed, to improve biosafety practices among workers. (AU)

Home-Based Respiratory Physiotherapy and Telephone-Based Psychological Support for COVID-19 Survivors in Peru: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Both pulmonary and mental health are affected following hospitalization for COVID-19 pneumonia. Pulmonary rehabilitation therapy has demonstrated benefits in improving mental health, but no validated combined programs that include mental health have been proposed. OBJECTIVE: This article presents the design of a trial that aimed to assess whether the participation in a combined rehabilitation program that includes home-based respiratory physiotherapy and telephone-based psychological support is associated with a greater improvement of pulmonary and mental health outcomes 7-12 weeks after COVID-19 hospitalization discharge compared with posthospital usual care provided by a public Peruvian hospital. METHODS: WAYRA (the word for air in the Quechua language) was an open-label, unblinded, two-arm randomized controlled trial. We recruited 108 participants aged 18-75 years who were discharged from the hospital after COVID-19 pneumonia that required >6 liters/minute of supplemental oxygen during treatment. Participants were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive the combined rehabilitation program or usual posthospital care provided by a public Peruvian hospital. The intervention consisted of 12 at-home respiratory rehabilitation sessions and 6 telephone-based psychological sessions. The primary outcome was the 6-minute walk distance. Secondary outcomes included lung function, mental health status (depression, anxiety, and trauma), and quality of life. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (before randomization) and at 7 and 12 weeks after hospital discharge to assess the difference between arms. RESULTS: This study was funded by the Peruvian National Council of Science Technology and Technology Innovation in July 2020. Ethics approval was obtained on September 2, 2020. Recruitment and data collection occurred between October 2020 and June 2021. Results are expected to be published by the end of 2022. CONCLUSIONS: WAYRA was the first randomized controlled trial evaluating combined pulmonary-mental health rehabilitation for hospitalized COVID-19 survivors in resource-limited settings, potentially providing a foundation for the cost-effective scale-up of similar multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04649736; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04649736. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/36001.

Metabolic Syndrome and Risk of Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review aimed to evaluate metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for the development of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We searched in four databases: (1) PubMed, (2) Web of Science, (3) Scopus, and (4) Embase until March 2021. We included cohort studies that evaluated the risk of PAD in patients with and without metabolic syndrome. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias analysis were performed independently by 2 authors. We used a random-effects model to conduct a meta-analysis of effect measures [hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR), and odds ratio (OR)]. Individual analyses were performed according to the diagnostic criterion used for metabolic syndrome. We included 7 cohort studies with a total of 43 824 participants. Most of the studies were performed in the general adult population. The metabolic syndrome and PAD diagnostic criteria used in the individual studies were heterogeneous. Almost all studies using RR found an association between metabolic syndrome and the development of PAD (RR: 1.31; confidence interval 95%: 1.03-1.59; I2: 15.6%). On the other hand, almost all the studies that used HR found no association between the two variables. All studies had a low risk of bias. In conclusion, available evidence on the association between metabolic syndrome and the risk of developing PAD is inconsistent. However, given the high prevalence of risk factors that patients with metabolic syndrome have, testing to rule out PAD could be recommended. Future studies should analyze each component of the metabolic syndrome separately and according to the severity of PAD.