Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Commun ; 28(7): 740-6, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23356451

RESUMO

Undertreatment of pain is common even when caused by serious illness. We examined whether physician-patient communication (particularly language indicating physician certainty) was associated with incomplete (i.e., premature closure) of pain assessment among patients with serious illness. Standardized patients (SPs) trained to portray patients with serious illness conducted unannounced, covertly audio-recorded visits to 20 consenting family physicians and 20 medical specialists. We coded extent of pain assessment, physician voice tone, and a measure of the degree to which physicians explored and validated patient concerns. To assess physician certainty, we searched transcripts for use of words that conveyed certainty using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count program. SP role fidelity was 94%, and few physicians were suspicious that they had seen an SP (14% of visits). Regression analyses showed that physicians who used more certainty language engaged in less thorough assessment of pain (ß = -0.48, p < .05). Conversely, physicians who engaged in more exploring and validating of patient concerns (ß = 0.27, p < .05) had higher ratings on anxiety/concerned voice tone (ß = 0.25, p <.01) and engaged in more thorough assessment of pain. Together, these three factors accounted for 38% of the variance in pain assessment. Physicians who convey certainty in discussions with patients suffering from pain may be more likely to close prematurely their assessment of pain. We found that expressions of physician concern and responsiveness (curiosity) were associated with superior pain assessment. Further study is needed to determine whether these associations are causal and mutable.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medição da Dor/psicologia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos , Simulação de Paciente , Médicos de Família , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Fam Process ; 49(4): 439-56, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21083548

RESUMO

Behavioral couples therapy (BCT) is an evidence-based couple therapy intervention for married or cohabitating substance abusers and their partners. This paper provides readers with a substantive and methodological review of Fals-Stewart, O'Farrell, and colleagues' program of research on BCT. The 23 studies included in this review provide support for the efficacy of BCT for improving substance use behavior, dyadic adjustment, child psychosocial outcomes, and reducing partner violence. This review includes a description of BCT, summaries of primary and secondary outcomes, highlights methodological strengths and weaknesses, notes barriers to dissemination, suggests future research directions, and provides clinical implications for couple and family therapists. Although there are several versions of BCT developed for the treatment of substance abuse this paper focuses on the version developed by O'Farrell, Fals-Stewart, and colleagues.


Assuntos
Controle Comportamental/métodos , Filho de Pais com Deficiência/psicologia , Características da Família , Terapia Conjugal , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/prevenção & controle , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Controle Comportamental/psicologia , Criança , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Saúde da Família , Humanos , Terapia Conjugal/instrumentação , Terapia Conjugal/métodos , Metanálise como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa , Maus-Tratos Conjugais/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Patient Educ Couns ; 77(3): 437-42, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19819098

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine physician communication associated with prognosis discussion with cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a study of physician-patient communication using trained actors. Thirty-nine physicians, including 19 oncologists and 20 family physicians participated in the study. Actors carried two hidden digital recorders to unannounced visits. We coded recordings for eliciting and validating patient concerns, attentive voice tone, and prognosis talk. RESULTS: Actor adherence to role averaged 92% and the suspected detection rate was 14%. In a multiple regression, eliciting and validating patient concerns (beta=.40, C.I.=0.11-0.68) attentiveness (beta=.32, C.I.=0.06-0.58) and being an oncologist vs. a family physician (beta=.33, C.I.=0.33-1.36) accounted for 46% of the variance in prognosis communication. CONCLUSION: Eliciting and validating patient concerns and attentiveness voice tone is associated with increased discussion of cancer patient prognosis as is physician specialty. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Eliciting and validating patient concerns and attentive voice tone may be markers of physician willingness to discuss emotionally difficult topics. Educating physicians about mindful practice may increase their ability to collect important information and to attend to patient concerns.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Neoplasias , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Relações Médico-Paciente , Intervalos de Confiança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Projetos Piloto , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estatística como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...