RESUMO
Polymeric surfactants are amphiphilic molecules with two or more different types of monomers. If one type of monomer interacts favorably with a liquid, and another type of monomer interacts favorably with another, immiscible liquid, then polymeric surfactants adsorb at the interface between the two liquids and reduce the interfacial tension. The effects of polymer architecture on the structural and thermodynamic properties of the liquid-liquid interface are studied using molecular simulations. The interface is modeled with a non-additive binary Lennard-Jones fluid in the two-phase region of the phase diagram. Block and gradient copolymer surfactants are represented with coarse-grained, bead-spring models, where each component of the polymer favors one or the other liquid. Gradient copolymers have a greater concentration at the interface than do block copolymers because the gradient copolymers adopt conformations partially aligned with the interface. The interfacial tension is determined as a function of the surface excess of polymeric surfactant. Gradient copolymers are more potent surfactants than block copolymers because the gradient copolymers cross the dividing surface multiple times, effectively acting as multiple individual surfactants. For a given surface excess, the interfacial tension decreases monotonically when changing from a block to a gradient architecture. The coarse-grained simulations are complemented by all-atom simulations of acrylic-acid/styrene copolymers at the chloroform-water interface, which have been studied in experiments. The agreement between the simulations (both coarse-grained and atomistic) and experiments is shown to be excellent, and the molecular-scale structures identified in the simulations help explain the variation of surfactancy with copolymer architecture.
RESUMO
The structures of amphiphilic block and gradient copolymers in solution and adsorbed onto surfaces are surveyed using molecular-dynamics simulations. A bead-spring model is used to identify the general effects of the different architectures: block and gradient copolymers have equal numbers of solvophilic and solvophobic beads, and the gradient copolymer is represented by a linear concentration profile along the chain. Each type of isolated copolymer forms a structure with a globular head of solvophobic beads, and a coil-like tail of solvophilic beads. The radius of gyration of a gradient copolymer is found to be much more sensitive to temperature than that of a block copolymer due to an unravelling mechanism. At finite concentrations, both gradient and block copolymers self-assemble into micelles, with the gradient copolymers again showing a larger temperature dependence. The micelles are characterised using simulated scattering profiles, which compare favourably to existing experimental data. The adsorption of copolymers onto structureless surfaces is modelled with an attractive potential that is selective for the solvophobic beads, and the surface structures are characterised using the average height of the molecules, and the proportion of beads adsorbed. Both types of copolymer form adsorbed films with persistent micelle-like structures, but the gradient copolymers show a stronger dependence on the strength of the surface interactions and the temperature. Coarse-grained, bead-spring models allow a rapid survey and comparison of the block and gradient architectures, and the results set the scene for future work with atomistic simulations. A superficial but favourable comparison is made between the results from the bead-spring models, and atomistic simulations of a butyl prop-2-enoate/prop-2-enoic acid (butyl acrylate/acrylic acid) copolymer in n-dodecane at room temperature.
