Development of a novel SCADA system for laboratory testing.

This document summarizes the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system that allows communication with, and controlling the output of, various I/O devices in the renewable energy systems and components test facility RESLab. This SCADA system differs from traditional SCADA systems in that it supports a continuously changing operating environment depending on the test to be performed. The SCADA System is based on the concept of having one Master I/O Server and multiple client computer systems. This paper describes the main features and advantages of this dynamic SCADA system, the connections of various field devices to the master I/O server, the device servers, and numerous software features used in the system. The system is based on the graphical programming language "LabVIEW" and its "Datalogging and Supervisory Control" (DSC) module. The DSC module supports a real-time database called the "tag engine," which performs the I/O operations with all field devices attached to the master I/O server and communications with the other tag engines running on the client computers connected via a local area network. Generic and detailed communication block diagrams illustrating the hierarchical structure of this SCADA system are presented. The flow diagram outlining a complete test performed using this system in one of its standard configurations is described.

Estimation of linear detection mechanisms for stimuli of medium spatial frequency.

Detection thresholds were obtained for a circularly-symmetric Gabor profile and Craik-Cornsweet profiles presented on a large white adapting field. These stimuli possessed peak spatial power between 1 and 6 c/deg. Their contrast was represented in an L, M and S cone contrast space. Detection thresholds were obtained for many vectors close to specific but theoretically important planes within this space. These data were fitted with a model comprising independent mechanisms, each a weighted sum of cone contrasts. The fit revealed a chromatic mechanism driven by delta L/L-delta M/M with no S cone input. Within cone contrast space, this mechanism was more sensitive than both a luminance mechanism with little S cone input but considerable variation in relative L to M cone input, and a blue-yellow chromatic mechanism.

Detection mechanisms in L-, M-, and S-cone contrast space.

Detection thresholds were obtained for a 2 degrees Gaussian-blurred spot flashed for 200 ms on an 8.9 degrees white adapting field of 1070 trolands. The spot's contrast was represented in an L-, M-, and S-cone contrast space. Detection thresholds were obtained for many vectors close to specific but theoretically important planes within this space. A three-dimensional surface was fitted to the data generated by the probability summation of three mechanisms, each a weighted sum of cone contrasts. The fit revealed a red-green chromatic mechanism driven by delta L/L--delta M/M with no S-cone input that was 1 order of magnitude more sensitive than the two other mechanisms. The latter consisted of a luminance mechanism with little S-cone input and a blue-yellow chromatic mechanism with the S cone opposed to L and M cones.

Texture segregation with luminance and chromatic contrast.

Preattentive texture discrimination was investigated using low spatial frequency texture elements. The contrast between the texture elements and the background was either purely luminance or purely chromatic, or some combination of both these types of contrast. The threshold to discriminate correctly the location of a different textured region was obtained from each subject, as was each subject's threshold to detect the elements of the texture. Using the ratio of texture to element detection as a measure of the effectiveness of texture discrimination, little difference could be found between the perception of luminance or chromatic texture. However, there were large and significant variations among subjects with otherwise normal colour vision.

Visual interactions with luminance and chromatic stimuli.

The visibility of a 1 degree, 200-msec flash on a large yellow field was measured as a function of the intensity of a coincident pedestal flash (a flash that was the same in both temporal intervals of a two-alternative forced-choice trial). The various flashes were incremental (+Lum) or decremental (-Lum) yellow luminance flashes or green (+Chr) or red (-Chr) isoluminant chromatic flashes. With uncrossed conditions (Lum tests on Lum pedestals or Chr tests on Chr pedestals), we obtained the conventional dipper function, that is, the function of threshold test intensity was highly asymmetric about zero pedestal intensity, and strong pedestals induced strong masking. Crossed conditions produced neither effect: for example, with Chr tests on Lum pedestals, there was no dipper function: the function of threshold test intensity was symmetric about zero pedestal intensity, and strong pedestals produced no masking. Instead, the suprathreshold luminance pedestals facilitated chromatic detection by as much as 2-3X and also linearized the chromatic psychometric function, further enhancing sensitivity to weak chromatic stimuli. (Chromatic sensitivity on the suprathreshold luminance pedestal was approximately 25X higher than luminance sensitivity on the uniform field.) A pedestal consisting of a thin luminance ring that surrounded the chromatic test produced facilitation equal to that of the uniform-luminance pedestal: the pedestal may thus act to demarcate the test spatially and promote chromatic comparison with the surround. Removing the uniform yellow surround eliminated this crossed facilitation but did not eliminate the uncrossed facilitation (the dipper function), suggesting that different mechanisms mediate the crossed and uncrossed facilitations.

Chromatic suppression of cone inputs to the luminance flicker mechanism.

Eisner and MacLeod [J. opt. Soc. Am. 71, 705-718 (1981)] showed that intense green and red chromatic adapting fields may suppress respectively the M and L cone input to the luminance mechanism by a factor considerably greater than Weber's law. We obtained evidence for such chromatic suppression by measuring complete detection contours for different ratios of red and green test lights presented in rapid flicker in the center of a uniform field. The detection contours represent thresholds as the quantal modulation of the M and L cones normalized by the quantal catch owing to the field. Luminance flicker mechanisms were identified by sections of the contours where detection was controlled by a linear sum of the M and L cone test signals. The slope of these sections indicated that intense red fields selectively suppressed the L cone input to the luminance mechanism by a factor greater than Weber's law; evidence was much less firm for an analogous suppression of the M cone input by intense green fields. The shape of the detection contours also suggests that intense red fields, which differentially light-adapt the M and L cones, may produce a moderate temporal phase-shift between the M and L cone signals. The shape of the temporal MTF of the M cone and the L cone input to the luminance mechanism may be determined at the cone stage, with the absolute sensitivity (vertical scaling) being partially dependent on selective chromatic suppression of the cone inputs owing to the intense chromatic field. Luminance and red-green chromatic temporal sensitivity functions are presented in terms of the M and L cone quantal modulations. Chromatic sensitivity progressively rises above luminance sensitivity as temporal frequency is gradually lowered below 15 Hz, with the consequence that 'contrast sensitivity' may be much higher for color than for luminance.

Second-site adaptation in the red-green chromatic pathways.

On different chromatic adapting fields, thresholds were measured with a 1.2 deg flash consisting of simultaneous incremental and decremental red and green components that stimulate the M and L cones in any desired ratio. Thresholds were plotted in normalized coordinates in which the quantal change in the M and L cones due to the flash was divided by the quantal catch due to the field. Detection contours for a wide range of test flashes provide evidence for luminance and chromatic mechanisms that respectively respond to the sum and difference of the M and L cone signals. Field color has little influence on the luminance mechanism but strongly affects chromatic detection, with sensitivity being maximal on yellow fields and declining slightly on green fields and declining strongly on red fields. Similar effects were obtained for long (200 msec) and very brief flashes, although the shape of the contours differed considerably. The results provide evidence for a second adaptation site within the red-green chromatic pathways, similar to the second-site in the S cone pathways. Chromatic fields (green and red) polarize the site and reduce sensitivity to chromatic flashes.