The Year in Aortic Surgery: Selected Highlights From 2023.

This article reviews the recent and relevant literature to the field of aortic surgery. Specific areas highlighted include outcomes of Stanford type A dissection, management of acute aortic syndromes, management of aortic aneurysms, and traumatic aortic injury. Although the focus was on articles from 2023, literature from prior years also was included, given that this article is the first of a series. Notably, the pertinent sections from the 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management Aortic Disease are discussed.

Acute cardiac tamponade during atrial flutter ablation: improved hemodynamics after positive pressure ventilation: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Acute cardiac tamponade is a rare event during any type of interventional or surgical procedure. It can occur during electrophysiology procedures due to radiofrequency ablation, lead or catheter manipulation, transseptal puncture, laser lead extractions, or left atrial appendage occlusion device positioning. Cardiac tamponade is difficult to study in a prospective manner, and case reports and case series are important contributions to understanding the best options for patient care. An 87-year-old Caucasian male patient breathing spontaneously developed acute tamponade during an atrial flutter ablation. Pericardial drain insertion was difficult, and hypotension failed to respond to epinephrine boluses. The patient became hypoxemic and hypercarbic, requiring intubation. Unexpectedly, the blood pressure markedly increased postintubation and remained in a normal range until the pericardium was drained. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous ventilation is considered important to maintain venous return to the right heart during cardiac tamponade. However, spontaneous ventilation reduces venous return to the left heart and worsens the paradoxical pulse in tamponade. Intravenous vasopressors are thought to be ineffective during cardiac tamponade. Our patient maintained pulmonary blood flow as indicated by end-tidal carbon dioxide measurements but had no measurable systemic blood pressure during spontaneous ventilation. Our case demonstrates that tracheal intubation and positive pressure ventilation can transiently improve left heart venous return, systemic perfusion, and drug delivery to the systemic circulation.

The Effects of Propofol on Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if hemodynamic changes secondary to propofol administration are a result of direct myocardial depression as measured by global longitudinal strain (GLS). The authors hypothesized that propofol would cause a significant worsening in GLS, indicating direct myocardial depression. DESIGN: Prospective, observational. SETTING: Endoscopy suite at a single academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing outpatient, elective endoscopic procedures at an outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care academic medical center. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Limited transthoracic echocardiograms were performed before and after patients received propofol for endoscopic procedures. Post-processing measurements included GLS, 2D (dimensional) ejection fraction (2D EF), and 3D EF. Using paired sample Student's t test, no statistically significant change in GLS, 2D EF, or 3D EF was found despite statistically significant hypotension. In fact, there was a trend toward more negative GLS (improved myocardial function) in patients after receiving propofol. CONCLUSION: We found propofol did not cause a reduction in systolic function as measured by GLS, a sensitive measure of myocardial contractility. Therefore, decreases in blood pressure after a propofol bolus in spontaneously breathing patients are likely due to decreased vascular tone and not impaired left ventricular systolic function. These results should be considered in the management of propofol-induced hypotension for spontaneously breathing patients.

Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Cardiac Surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has become a widespread topic in perioperative medicine over the past 20 years. The goals of ERAS are to improve patient outcomes and perioperative experience, reduce length of hospital stay, minimize complications, and reduce cost. Interventions and factors before, during, and after surgery all potentially play a role with the cumulative effect being superior quality of patient care. RECENT FINDINGS: Preoperatively, patient and family education, optimization of nutritional status, and antibiotic prophylaxis all improve outcomes. Recovery is also expedited by the use of multimodal analgesia, regional anesthesia, and opioid reducing approaches. Intraoperatively, the anesthesiologist can have an impact by using less-invasive monitors appropriately to guide fluid and hemodynamic management as well as maintaining normothermia. Postoperatively, early enteral feeding, mobilization, and removal of invasive lines support patient recovery. Implementation of ERAS protocol in cardiac surgery faces challenges by some unique perioperative perspectives in cardiac surgery, such as systemic anticoagulation, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, significantly more hemodynamic variations, larger volume replacement, postoperative intubation and mechanical ventilation and associated sedation, and potentially significantly more co-existing morbidities than other surgical procedures. ERAS in cardiac surgery may benefit patients more related to its high risk and high cost nature. This manuscript specifically reviews the unique aspects of enhanced recovery in cardiac surgery.