The impact of antihypertensive use in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in patients receiving alteplase.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with intravenous alteplase within 4.5 h of symptom onset is associated with neurologic improvement. High baseline blood pressure (BP) and BP variability during the first 24 h of AIS is associated with increased early adverse events and death. The purpose of this study is to characterize the incidence of poor neurologic outcome in patients treated with alteplase for AIS who received antihypertensive medications prior to and within the first 24 h following alteplase administration compared with patients who did not. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort of patients >18 years diagnosed with AIS from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 who received one or more antihypertensive medication in the first 24 h of AIS in patients receiving alteplase compared to controls. The primary endpoint was poor neurologic outcome at 90 days, according to modified Rankin Scale ≥3. Univariate analysis was conducted using Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, or Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine independent predictors of poor outcome. RESULTS: Of the 587 patients evaluated, 351 (59.7%) were included, of which 127 (36.2%) received antihypertensive(s). More patients in the antihypertensive treatment group had a history of hypertension (88.2% vs. 69.6%, p < 0.01), diabetes (37% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.03) and chronic kidney disease (19.7% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.01). Intravenous push labetalol was most commonly administered (81.2%), followed by nicardipine (44.1%), and hydralazine (22%). More patients in the antihypertensive treatment group experienced poor neurologic outcome at 90 days (53.5% vs. 38.8%, p < 0.01), however, this finding was not observed after multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSION: Antihypertensive treatment in the first 24 h of AIS was associated with poor neurologic outcomes at 90 days. However, after controlling for other clinical factors in a multivariable logistic regression, this association was no longer observed.

Hydrocortisone Continuous Infusion Versus Bolus Dose on Glycemic Control in Critically Ill Subjects.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid therapy in patients with septic shock can improve hemodynamics but can also cause hyperglycemia. Continuous infusion (CI) hydrocortisone has limited evidence that it may reduce hyperglycemia relative to bolus dose (BD) therapy, but CI can be cumbersome and requires attention to intravenous access and drug incompatibilities. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of CI hydrocortisone with BD on glycemic control. METHODS: A matched, retrospective cohort study of blood glucose, insulin requirements, and glycemic variability was performed between patients with shock receiving CI and BD hydrocortisone. Patients were matched based on history of type 2 diabetes and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: Baseline blood glucose was similar between groups, with higher baseline hourly insulin requirements in the CI group (CI: 12 [12.8] units, BD: 6.7 [7] units, P = .0012). For the first 72 hours of treatment, there was no difference in mean blood glucose with higher average hourly insulin requirements in the CI group (CI 7.8 [7.7] units, BD: 5.5 [6.9] units, P < .0001). There was no difference in glycemic variability between groups. CONCLUSIONS: CI hydrocortisone therapy for septic shock does not appear to have a favorable impact on mean blood glucose or influence glycemic variability relative to BD therapy.