Vaginal delivery of the second twin: A simulation program for residents in obstetrics and gynecology in a type III university maternity hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To implement a vaginal delivery of the second twin simulation program for obstetric and gynecology residents, to reduce maternal-fetal mortality in the management of twin pregnancies in the delivery room. DESIGN: A prospective education program. The session consisted of a theoretical part, a practical part on a mannequin and an evaluation. The model was designed in a simple and reproducible way. The simulation evaluation was done at several levels according to the validated Kirkpatrick model. SETTING: A tertiary level university maternity hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ten obstetric and gynecology residents participated. RESULTS: The resident's personal feelings about their ability to perform the maneuvers increased significantly after participation in the simulation session. Their technical skills in performing the maneuvers were assessed in a second step. The majority of the participants considered the model realistic and the session useful. All agreed that the simulation was an essential part of their learning process. CONCLUSION: A simulated vaginal delivery of the second twin session allows residents to be safely trained in these obstetrical maneuvers, which can be difficult to teach and perform.

Assessment of a multiprofessional training programme by in situ simulation in the maternity units of the Pays de Loire regional perinatal network.

INTRODUCTION: Initially dispensed in specialized simulation centers, simulation training has recently begun to take place directly in healthcare facilities, that is, in situ. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of training by in situ simulation in obstetrics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The training program, dispensed over a 2-day period, took place in maternity units of the members of the Pays de la Loire perinatal network, Réseau Sécurité Naissance (Network Safety Birth). All participants received a learner satisfaction questionnaire to complete (5-point Likert-like scales). Then, at least 6 months later, each maternity ward received a general questionnaire to assess the effect of the training, as well as a second questionnaire specific to each institution, about the areas for improvement proposed by the teaching team after debriefings. RESULTS: The 14 establishments included in our study returned 375 satisfaction questionnaires. In all, 91.1 % were very satisfied and reported that the training met their expectations, and 99.7 % thought the program would have an impact on their professional practice. More than 94 % of the learners wanted more simulation sessions. Among the 14 facilities, 9 (64.3 %) returned their evaluation questionnaires. In 44.4 % of cases, they reported improvement in team cohesion and in team communication, while the others reported these elements remained stable. All maternity units reported that the training had a positive impact on their team, and that they would be interested in new training program with in situ simulation. DISCUSSION: Most participants clearly appreciated this training. In situ simulation training also led to the identification of areas for improvements, many of them accomplished, through the drafting of protocols or material modifications aimed at improving staff practices and therefore global patient care. There are many ways by which these training programs can be made sustainable, including the development of a new training program of in situ simulation or the creation of onsite simulation sessions on demand or by the professionals at each institution. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrated the enthusiasm of healthcare professionals about in situ simulation. Moreover, overall improvement in team communication and cohesion was reported in the medium term (evaluation at more than 6 months). The interest of continuing these training sessions appears undeniable.