Primary Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Large-Volume Single-Surgeon Study.

There are conflicting views regarding techniques for repair of small umbilical hernias (UHs). Here, we compare the recurrence rate in primary repair with that reported for mesh repair by examining a single surgeon's practice at a large medical center with a comprehensive electronic medical record. A six-year retrospective review of primary UH repairs between January 2012 and December 2017 at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center was undertaken. Patients were identified through a database search of the electronic medical record. The primary endpoint of UH recurrence was examined; median follow-up was 3.4 years. Primary, elective UH repair was performed in 244 patients; 71 per cent of hernias were small (<2 cm). The total number of recurrences was seven (3%). The t test analysis showed significant differences in the average size of hernia defects between those with recurrences (2 cm) and those without (1.4 cm), P < 0.05. Primary repair affords low infection and recurrence rates, comparable to those reported for mesh repair. Our single-surgeon/large-volume study contributes to the evidence that primary UH repair is a safe and durable method, with low risk of recurrence. The use of absorbable monofilament suture, and selection for lower BMI and smaller hernia sizes proved to be effective.

Cracking the Code: The Unexpected Challenge of Identifying Major Bile Duct Injuries.

The reported rate of major bile duct injury (BDI) after cholecystectomy is 0.2 to 0.5 per cent. We evaluated the accuracy of coding major BDIs integrating both Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and ICD-9 coding. A retrospective review was conducted for more than 3.5 million members of a large managed health-care organization from January 2007 to December 2013. A total of 56,194 cholecystectomies were captured over this 6-year period. Major BDIs were defined as unintended transection of a major bile duct, Bismuth-Strasberg classification E1-E5, and requiring biliary reconstruction within one year of cholecystectomy. Based on two published study methods (CPT 47760, 47765, 47780 and ICD-9 code 998.2), 173 possible BDIs were identified. Only 13 (7.5%) were confirmed to have a major BDI. The remaining 160 cases were minor complications or were unrelated to cholecystectomy. This reflects an overall BDI rate of 0.02 per cent, an order of magnitude less than commonly published rates. There is a lack of consistent methodology to identify major bile duct injuries. This calls into question the accuracy of published rates. We suspect that some major injuries were not captured. We recommend a universal clinical registry and specific ICD codes to accurately identify this serious complication.