Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJOG ; 126(3): 370-381, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29727918

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: International comparison of complete uterine rupture. DESIGN: Descriptive multi-country population-based study. SETTING: International. POPULATION: International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems (INOSS). METHODS: We merged individual data, collected prospectively in nine population-based studies, of women with complete uterine rupture, defined as complete disruption of the uterine muscle and the uterine serosa, regardless of symptoms and rupture of fetal membranes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of complete uterine rupture, regional variation and correlation with rates of caesarean section (CS) and trial of labour after CS (TOLAC). Severe maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 864 complete uterine ruptures in 2 625 017 deliveries. Overall prevalence was 3.3 (95% CI 3.1-3.5) per 10 000 deliveries, 22 (95% CI 21-24) in women with and 0.6 (95% CI 0.5-0.7) in women without previous CS. Prevalence in women with previous CS was negatively correlated with previous CS rate (ρ = -0.917) and positively correlated with TOLAC rate of the background population (ρ = 0.600). Uterine rupture resulted in peripartum hysterectomy in 87 of 864 women (10%, 95% CI 8-12%) and in a perinatal death in 116 of 874 infants (13.3%, 95% CI 11.2-15.7) whose mother had uterine rupture. Overall rate of neonatal asphyxia was 28% in neonates who survived. CONCLUSIONS: Higher prevalence of complete uterine ruptures per TOLAC was observed in countries with low previous CS and high TOLAC rates. Rates of hysterectomy and perinatal death are about 10% following complete uterine rupture, but in women undergoing TOLAC the rates are extremely low (only 2.2 and 3.2 per 10 000 TOLACs, respectively.) TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Prevalence of complete uterine rupture is higher in countries with low previous CS and high TOLAC rates.


Assuntos
Asfixia Neonatal/epidemiologia , Recesariana/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Morte Materna , Morte Perinatal , Prova de Trabalho de Parto , Ruptura Uterina/epidemiologia , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Prevalência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea
2.
BJOG ; 123(8): 1348-55, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26227006

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate prevalence, estimate risk factors, and antenatal suspicion of abnormally invasive placenta (AIP) associated with laparotomy in women in the Nordic countries. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING AND POPULATION: A 3-year Nordic collaboration among obstetricians to identify and report on uterine rupture, peripartum hysterectomy, excessive blood loss, and AIP from 2009 to 2012 The Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study (NOSS). METHODS: In the NOSS study, clinicians reported AIP cases from maternity wards and the data were validated against National health registries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence, risk factors, antenatal suspicion, birth complications, and risk estimations using aggregated national data. RESULTS: A total of 205 cases of AIP in association with laparotomy were identified, representing 3.4 per 10 000 deliveries. The single most important risk factor, which was reported in 49% of all cases of AIP, was placenta praevia. The risk of AIP increased seven-fold after one prior caesarean section (CS) to 56-fold after three or more CS. Prior postpartum haemorrhage was associated with six-fold increased risk of AIP (95% confidence interval 3.7-10.9). Approximately 70% of all cases were not diagnosed antepartum. Of these, 39% had prior CS and 33% had placenta praevia. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a lower CS rate in the population may be the most effective way to lower the incidence of AIP. Focused ultrasound assessment of women at high risk will likely strengthen antenatal suspicion. Prior PPH is a novel risk factor associated with an increased prevalence of AIP. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: An ultrasound assessment in women with placenta praevia or prior CS may double the awareness for AIP.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Placenta Acreta/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Ruptura Uterina/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Islândia/epidemiologia , Incidência , Noruega/epidemiologia , Período Periparto , Placenta Acreta/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Suécia/epidemiologia , Ultrassonografia , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA