Impact of Pulsatile Machine Perfusion on Posttransplant Recovery in Asystole Donation: Organ Optimization and the Future of Renal Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: With the increase in life expectancy and the aging of the population, chronic kidney disease has become increasingly prevalent in our environment. Kidney transplantation remains the gold standard treatment for end-stage renal disease, but the supply of renal grafts has not been able to keep pace with growing demand. Because of this rationale, organ selection criteria have been extended (expanded criteria donation), and alternative donation types, such as donation after circulatory death, have been evaluated. These approaches aim to increase the pool of potential donors, albeit with organs of potentially lower quality. Various forms of donations, including donation after circulatory death, have also undergone assessment. This approach aims to augment the pool of potential donors, notwithstanding the compromised quality of organs associated with such methods. Diverse strategies have been explored to enhance graft function, with one of the most promising being the utilization of pulsatile machine perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on 28 transplant recipients who met the inclusion criterion of sharing the same donor, wherein one organ was preserved by cold storage and the other by pulsatile machine perfusion. We performed statistical analysis on posttransplant recovery parameters throughout the patients' hospitalization, including admission and discharge phases. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were noted in delayed graft function (P = .04), blood transfusions requirements, and Clavien-Dindo complications. Furthermore, an overall trend of improvement in discharge parameters and hospital stay was in favor of the pulsatile machine perfusion group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of pulsatile machine perfusion as a method of renal preservation results in graft optimization, leading to earlier recovery and fewer complications compared with cold storage in the context of donation after circulatory death.

What is the impact of post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence on everyday quality of life? Linking Pad usage and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short-Form (ICIQ-SF) for a COMBined definition (PICOMB definition).

AIMS: To identify the definition for urinary continence (UC) after radical prostatectomy (RP) which reflects best patients' perception of quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Continence was prospectively assessed in 634 patients, 12 months after RP using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short-Form (ICIQ-SF) and the number of pads employed in a 24-hour period (pad usage). We used the one-way ANOVA technique with posthoc pairwise comparisons according to Scheffé's method (homogeneous subsets) for assessing the degree of QoL deficit related to urinary incontinence (UI). RESULTS: The continence prevalence is 64.4%, 74.1%, 88.3%, and 35.8% using "0 pads," "1 safety pad," "1 pad," and "ICIQ score 0" definitions, respectively. Pad usage is moderately strongly associated with ICIQ 1, 2, and 3 (ρ = 0.744, 0.677, and 0.711, respectively; p < 0.001). Concordance between classical UC definitions is acceptable between "0 pads-ICIQ score 0" (K = 0.466), but poor for "1 safety pad" and "1 pad" (K = 0.326 and 0.137, respectively). Patients with "0 pad usage" have better QoL related to urine leakage than patients with "1 safety pad" or "1 pad" (1.41 vs. 2.44 and 3.11, respectively; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences found regarding QoL between patients with ICIQ score 0 and ICIQ score 2 (1.01 vs. 1.63; p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Pad usage and the ICIQ-SF's answers provide useful information. We propose a combined definition (0 pads and ICIQ score ≤2) as it is the definition with the least impact on daily QoL.