Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. clín. esp. (Ed. impr.) ; 223(10): 585-595, dic. 2023. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-228436

RESUMO

Objetivos Evaluar la frecuencia de las admisiones en los servicios de urgencias (ASU) por ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) y no-ACSC de personas que viven en residencias; describir y comparar sus características, y analizar los costes asociados. Método Este estudio multicéntrico, retrospectivo y observacional evaluó 2.444ASU de personas ≥65 años que viven en residencias en 5 servicios de urgencias de Cataluña por ACSC y no-ACSC, en 2017. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, estado funcional y cognitivo, e información sobre diagnóstico y hospitalización. Se evaluaron los costes relacionados con ACSC-ASU y se efectuó un análisis de sensibilidad utilizando diferentes supuestos de disminución de ingresos por ACSC. Resultados La media de edad de la muestra del estudio fue de 85,9 años (desviación estándar: 7,2 años). La frecuencia de ACSC-ASU y no-ACSC-ASU fue del 56,6 y el 43,4%, respectivamente. El 56,6 y el 78% presentaban dependencia severa y deterioro cognitivo, respectivamente, sin observarse diferencias entre los 2 grupos. Las 3 ACSC más frecuentes fueron caídas/traumatismos (13,8%), enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica/asma (11,4%) e infección urinaria (7,4%). El coste medio por ACSC-ASU fue de 1.408,24€. Suponiendo una reducción del 60% de las ACSC-ASU, el ahorro de costes estimado sería de 1,2 millones de euros. Conclusiones Las admisiones en urgencias por ACSC procedentes de entornos residenciales suponen un impacto significativo tanto en la frecuencia como en los costes. La disminución de estas enfermedades mediante la aplicación de intervenciones específicas podría redirigir los costes evitados hacia la mejora del apoyo asistencial en los entornos residenciales (AU)


Objectives To assess the frequency of emergency department admissions (EDAs) for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) and non-ACSC among older adults living in care homes (CH), to describe and compare their demographic and clinical characteristics, the outcomes of the hospitalization process and the associated costs. Method This multicenter, retrospective and observational study evaluated 2444 EDAs of older adults ≥65 years old living in care homes in five emergency departments in Catalonia (Spain) by ACSC and non-ACSC, in 2017. Sociodemographic variables, prior functional and cognitive status, and information on diagnosis and hospitalization were collected. Additionally, the costs related with the EDAs were calculated, as well as a sensitivity analysis using different assumptions of decreased admissions due to ACSC Results A total of 2444 ED admissions were analyzed. The patients’ mean (SD) age was 85.9 (7.2) years. The frequency of ACSC-EDA and non-ACSC-EDA was 56.6% and 43.4%, respectively. Severe dependency and cognitive impairment were present in 56.6% and 78%, respectively, with no differences between the two groups. The three most frequent ACSC were falls/trauma (13.8%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma (11.4%) and urinary tract infection (7.4%). The average cost per ACSC-EDA was €1408.24. Assuming a 60% reduction of ACSC-EDA, the estimated cost savings would be €1.2 million. Conclusions Emergency admissions for ACSC from care homes have a significant impact on both frequency and costs. Reducing these conditions through targeted interventions could redirect the avoided costs toward improving care support in residential settings (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/economia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 223(10): 585-595, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37838224

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency of emergency department admissions (EDA) for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) and non-ACSC among older adults living in care homes (CH), to describe and compare their demographic and clinical characteristics, the outcomes of the hospitalisation process and the associated costs. METHOD: This multicenter, retrospective and observational study evaluated 2444 EDAs of older adults ≥ 65 years old living in care homes in 5 emergency departments in Catalonia (Spain) by ACSC and non-ACSC, in 2017. Sociodemographic variables, prior functional and cognitive status, and information on diagnosis and hospitalisation were collected. Additionally, the costs related with the EDAs were calculated, as well as a sensitivity analysis using different assumptions of decreased admissions due to ACSC. RESULTS: A total of 2444 ED admissions were analysed. The patients' mean (SD) age was 85.9 (7.2) years. The frequency of ACSC-EDA and non-ACSC-EDA was 56.6% and 43.4%, respectively. Severe dependency and cognitive impairment were present in 56.6% and 78%, respectively, with no differences between the two groups. The three most frequent ACSC were falls/trauma (13.8%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma (11.4%) and urinary tract infection (7.4%). The average cost per ACSC-EDA was є1,408.24. Assuming a 60% reduction of ACSC-EDA, the estimated cost savings would be є1.2 million. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency admissions for ACSC from care homes have a significant impact on both frequency and costs. Reducing these conditions through targeted interventions could redirect the avoided costs towards improving care support in residential settings.


Assuntos
Condições Sensíveis à Atenção Primária , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hospitalização , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
3.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol ; 80(2): 71-7, 2005 Feb.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15750884

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We compare the contrast sensitivity and visual acuity obtained with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens (Tecnis Z9000) with the contrast sensitivity and visual acuity obtained with a standard acrylic foldable intraocular lens (Acrysof SA60 AT). METHODS: In this prospective trial, 64 patients presenting for cataract surgery were randomized to receive in both eyes either the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens or the the Acrysof SA60AT intraocular lens: 32 Tecnis Z9000 and 32 Acrysof SA60AT. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were monocular and binocularly tested in all of them preoperatively and three months after surgery. RESULTS: The Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens provided statistically significantly better monocular (Tecnis group: 0.85; Acrysof group: 0.78; p < 0.01) and binocular (Tecnis group: 0.95; Acrysof group: 0.86; p < 0.02) visual acuity. The contrast sensitivity mean was also greater in Tecnis group in monocular and binocular conditions, but without statistical signification. CONCLUSION: Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery improved in both groups. But monocular and binocular visual acuity was statistically significantly better only in Tecnis group. The contrast sensitivity mean values were greater in Tecnis group but without statistically significant differences.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Sensibilidades de Contraste/fisiologia , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Pseudofacia/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Visão Binocular/fisiologia
4.
Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol ; 80(2): 71-78, feb. 2005. ilus, tab
Artigo em Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-038465

RESUMO

Propósito: Comparar los resultados obtenidos tras la implantación de una lente con óptica prolata modificada (Tecnis Z9000) con los de una lente plegable acrílica convencional (Acrysof SA60 AT) en cuanto a agudeza visual y sensibilidad al contraste.Métodos: En este estudio prospectivo 64 pacientes fueron aleatorizados para recibir en sus dos ojos el mismo tipo de lente intraocular: 32 Tecnis Z9000 y 32 Acrysof SA60AT. La agudeza visual y sensibilidad al contraste se evaluó monocular y binocularmente en todos ellos antes de la cirugía y a los tres meses de evolución.Resultados: La agudeza visual monocular fue mejor en el grupo Tecnis (0,85) que en el Acrysof (0,78) (p<0,01). En condiciones de binocularidad también resultó superior la AV en el grupo Tecnis (0,95) que en el Acrysof (0,86) (p<0,02). La sensibilidad media al contraste también es superior para el grupo Tecnis tanto monocular como binocularmente pero no alcanza significación estadística.Conclusión: En ambos grupos se produjo una mejoría de la agudeza visual y sensibilidad al contraste después de la cirugía de catarata pero el implante Tecnis se asoció con una agudeza visual significativamente mejor tanto monocular como binocularmente. Los valores medios de sensibilidad al contraste son superiores en el grupo Tecnis pero la diferencia no es estadísticamente significativa


Purpose: We compare the contrast sensitivity and visual acuity obtained with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens (Tecnis Z9000) with the contrast sensitivity and visual acuity obtained with a standard acrylic foldable intraocular lens (Acrysof SA60 AT).Methods: In this prospective trial, 64 patients presenting for cataract surgery were randomized to receive in both eyes either the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens or the the Acrysof SA60AT intraocular lens: 32 Tecnis Z9000 and 32 Acrysof SA60AT. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were monocular and binocularly tested in all of them preoperatively and three months after surgery.Results: The Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens provided statistically significantly better monocular (Tecnis group: 0.85; Acrysof group: 0.78; p<0.01) and binocular (Tecnis group: 0.95; Acrysof group: 0.86; p<0.02) visual acuity. The contrast sensitivity mean was also greater in Tecnis group in monocular and binocular conditions, but without statistical signification.Conclusion: Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery improved in both groups. But monocular and binocular visual acuity was statistically significantly better only in Tecnis group. The contrast sensitivity mean values were greater in Tecnis group but without statistically significant differences


Assuntos
Idoso , Humanos , Extração de Catarata , Sensibilidades de Contraste/fisiologia , Implante de Lente Intraocular , Pseudofacia/fisiopatologia , Acuidade Visual/fisiologia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Visão Binocular/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...