The use of digital dermoscopy in the surveillance of melanocytic skin lesions: A real-life retrospective study comparing university hospital and private practices.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the role of digital dermoscopy (DD) in the surveillance of pigmented lesions in real-life practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients followed with DD by 4 hospital dermatologists (group 1) and 4 private dermatologists (group 2) were retrospectively included if they had had at least 2 DD examinations for a minimum of 4 pigmented lesions. Their characteristics, risk factors, history of excision of benign nevi and melanomas prior to and during the DD follow-up, and characteristics of detected melanomas, were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-six patients were included in group 1 and 205 in groups 2. A family history of melanoma (25% vs. 12%, p<0.01), a personal history of melanoma before DD follow-up (47% vs. 15%, p<0.01), and a family (3% vs. 0%, p=0.01) and personal (8% vs. 1%, p<0.01) germline CDKN2a mutation were more frequent in group 1 than in group 2. In both groups, the number of excisions of benign lesions was higher before DD follow-up (380 and 347, respectively) than during DD follow-up (194 and 132). During follow-up, 29 melanomas were detected in group 1, with a median Breslow thickness of 0.4mm, versus 1.3mm for melanomas diagnosed before DD follow-up (p<0.02). In group 2, 4 melanoma and 5 superficial atypical melanocytic proliferations of unknown significance were detected. The median Breslow thickness of newly diagnosed melanomas was 0.35mm vs. 0.6mm before DD follow-up (p=0.1). CONCLUSION: In both populations in real-life practice, DD seemed to allow the detection of thin melanomas and to decrease the rate of "futile" resections.

Intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis following neoplastic right hemicolectomy resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

PURPOSE: While minimally invasive surgery is the preferred approach for right hemicolectomy, the choice of anastomotic technique is still debated. Both intracorporeal (ICA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) are described, with conflicting reports on safety and efficacy seen. This study aimed to examine impact of ICA and ECA on outcomes in right hemicolectomy. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCT) was performed. The primary outcome was overall morbidity. The secondary outcomes included both perioperative and post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: Four RCTs were included incorporating 399 patients (199 patients (49.9%) ICA Vs 200 (50.1%) ECA). There was no significant difference in overall morbidity (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43, 1.48, p = 0.47), anastomotic leak (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.58, 3.13, p = 0.5) or surgical site infections (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17, 1.64, p = 0.27). ICA patients had a significantly less post-operative ileus (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.3-0.94, p = 0.03) quicker return to first flatus (WMD - 0.71, 95% CI - 1.12, 0.31, p = 0.0005), first bowel motion (WMD - 0.53, 95% CI - 0.69, - 0.37, p < 0.00001) and first meal (WMD - 0.68, 95% CI - 1.33, - 0.03, p = 0.04). Pain scores were significantly better for ICA patients on POD 3 (WMD - 0.76, 95% CI - 1.23, - 0.28, p = 0.002), POD 4 (WMD - 0.90, 95% CI - 1.71, - 0.09, p = 0.03) and POD 5 (WMD - 0.67, 95% CI - 1.22, - 0.13, p = 0.01). Length of hospital stay was similar (WMD - 0.46, 95% CI - 1.14, 0.22, p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: ICA is associated with a quicker return to normal physiological function with equivalent post-operative morbidity. Both ECA and ICA are safe and feasible for restoring normal bowel continuity.