RESUMO
Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (rmTBI) is a potentially debilitating condition with long-term sequelae. Animal models are used to study rmTBI in a controlled environment, but there is currently no established standard battery of behavioral tests used. Primarily, we aimed to identify the best combination and timing of behavioral tests to distinguish injured from uninjured animals in rmTBI studies, and secondarily, to determine whether combinations of independent experiments have better behavioral outcome prediction accuracy than individual experiments. Data from 1203 mice from 58 rmTBI experiments, some of which have already been published, were used. In total, 11 types of behavioral tests were measured by 37 parameters at 13 time points during the first 6 months after injury. Univariate regression analyses were used to identify optimal combinations of behavioral tests and whether the inclusion of multiple heterogenous experiments improved accuracy. k-means clustering was used to determine whether a combination of multiple tests could distinguish mice with rmTBI from uninjured mice. We found that a combination of behavioral tests outperformed individual tests alone when distinguishing animals with rmTBI from uninjured animals. The best timing for most individual behavioral tests was 3-4 months after first injury. Overall, Morris water maze (MWM; hidden and probe frequency) was the behavioral test with the best capability of detecting injury effects (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.98). Combinations of open field tests and elevated plus mazes also performed well (AUC = 0.92), as did the forced swim test alone (AUC = 0.90). In summary, multiple heterogeneous experiments tended to predict outcome better than individual experiments, and MWM 3-4 months after injury was the optimal test, also several combinations also performed well. In order to design future pre-clinical rmTBI trials, we have included an interactive application available online utilizing the data from the study via the Supplementary URL.
