Effect of socioeconomic level on knowledge of stroke in the general population: A social inequality gradient.

OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic status is a factor that influences health-related behaviour in individuals as well as health conditions in entire populations. The objective of the present study was to analyse the sociodemographic factors that may influence knowledge of stroke. METHOD: Cross-sectional study. A representative sample was selected by double randomisation. Face-to-face interviews were carried out by previously trained medical students using a structured questionnaire with open- and closed-ended questions. Adequate knowledge was previously defined. The Mantel-Haenszel test and adjusted logistic regression analysis were used to assess the association between knowledge of stroke and the study variables. RESULTS: 2411 subjects were interviewed (59.9% women; mean age 49.0 [SD 17.3] years) Seventy-three per cent were residents of urban areas, 24.7% had a university education, and 15.2% had a low level of schooling. Only 2.1% reported earning more than 40 000 euros/year, with 29.9% earning less than 10 000. Nearly 74% reported having an excellent or good state of health. The unemployment rate was 17.0%. Prevalence of "adequate knowledge" was 39.7% (95% CI: 37.7%-41.6%). Trend analysis showed an association between knowledge of stroke and income (z=10.14, P<0.0001); educational level (z=15.95, P<0.0001); state of health (z=7.92, P<0.0001); and employment status (z=8.98, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Educational level, income, employment status, and state of health are independent factors for adequate knowledge of stroke. Public awareness campaigns should present material using simple language and efforts should be directed toward the most disadvantaged social strata in particular.

Longitudinal study of in-hospital consultations with neurology in a tertiary hospital. A health care activity on the increase.

OBJECTIVE: In-hospital consultation (IHC) is a service that some medical specialties provide to others with the aim of resolving complications in patients admitted to different hospital units. The aim of this study is to perform a descriptive analysis and longitudinal study of IHCs received in our department during the last 5 years. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted on the IHCs made within the period 2005-2009. The data analysed were as follows: department of origin of the IHC, reason for consult, date, priority of care, definitive diagnosis, need for follow-up, need for transfer, and the demographic data of the patients. RESULTS: There were a total of 1458 IHCs in the period studied. The mean age of the patients was 58.2 ± 19.10 years, and 837 (57.6%) were males. The number of IHCs per year was: 2005: 263; 2006: 226; 2007: 239; 2007: 239, 2008: 329 and 2009: 401. The majority (86.8%) had normal priority, 8.5% high priority, and 4.7% were urgent. The Emergency Department (12%), Cardiology (10.9%), General Medicine (9.8%) and Psychiatry (8.9%) were the services with the highest demand. The most frequent reasons for consulting were loss of consciousness and epileptic seizures (24.6%), cerebral vascular disease (21.1%), and confusional states and cognitive impairment (13.4%). Over one third (36.8%) were resolved in the first consultation, and the remainder (63.8%) required follow up. Of all the cases assessed, 8.4% required transfer to Neurology. CONCLUSIONS: IHC is a complex activity that may not resolve all questions in a single visit. It involves a health care burden which is increasing annually. The increasing diagnostic complexity of the neurology, as well as the increasingly more specific treatments are the factors that lead to this higher demand.

[Negative predictive value of (123)I Ioflupane SPECT in movement disorders]. / Valor predictivo negativo del SPECT con Ioflupano (123)I en los trastornos del movimiento.

OBJECTIVE: A non-degenerative etiology is supported by a normal SPI [normal SPECT with 123I-Ioflupane (SPI)] in a patient with movement disorders (MD). METHOD: A total of 196 SPIs were conducted during the period of 2004/05. Of these, 44 were selected in order to rule out degenerative MD (DMD), the results being normal in these patients. The clinical background of these patients were reviewed in a minimum period of 24 months (range 24-40), collecting the diagnoses reached by the neurology specialists. The SPI were evaluated using a consensus, according to subjective criteria and quantification. RESULTS: Thirty-six of the 44 patients (81%) were identified at 2 years of having nondegenerative movement disorders: 18 as essential tremor, 5 as drug-induced disorder, 4 as vascular disease, 3 as peripheral polyneuropathy, 2 postural tremors, 1 writer's cramp, 1 psychogenic tremor, 1 intercranial hypertension and 1 fibromyalgia. The remaining 8 patients were diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in 5 cases, 1 corticobasal degeneration, 1 multisystemic atrophy and another degenerative Parkinsonism with unclear etiology. CONCLUSION: The SPI in our hospital has a lower negative predictive value than the data reported in the literature. The false negatives could be explained because most of our patients come from neurologist physicians who are not movement disorder experts. In addition, a small proportion of degenerative Parkinsonism could evolve with normal SPI.

Valor predictivo negativo del SPECT con Ioflupano 123I en los trastornos del movimiento / Negative predictive value of 123I Ioflupane SPECT in movement disorders

Objetivo: en un paciente con trastorno del movimiento (TM) un SPI normal apoya una etiología no degenerativa. Se ha evaluado retrospectivamente la situación clínica de los pacientes a los 2 años de realizarse un SPI con resultado normal para valorar cuál fue la actitud de los especialistas en neurología de nuestra área ante este tipo de pacientes. Método: de un total de 196 SPI realizados durante el período 2004-2005, se seleccionaron 44 en los que la intención era descartar un TM degenerativo (TMD) y cuyo resultado fue normal. Los historiales clínicos de estos pacientes sen revisaron en un período de, al menos, 24 meses (rango, 24-40), y se recogieron los diagnósticos alcanzados por los especialistas en neurología. Los SPI fueron informados en consenso, atendiendo a criterios subjetivos y de cuantificación. Resultados: 36 de los 44 (81%) pacientes se etiquetaron a los 2 años como TM no degenerativos (TMND): 18 temblores esenciales, 5 secundarios a fármacos, 4 vasculares, 3 neuropatías, 2 temblores posturales, 1 degeneración corticobasal, 1 calambre del escribiente, 1 psicógeno, 1 hipertensión intracraneal y 1 fibromialgia. Los 8 restantes estaban diagnosticados como TMD: 5 casos con enfermedad de Parkinson idiopática, 1 degeneración corticobasal, 1 atrofia multisistémica y finalmente un TMD sin filiación etiológica definitiva. Conclusión: el valor predictivo negativo del SPI (81%) fue levemente inferior al descrito en la bibliografía; hecho que puede explicarse por provenir los pacientes de una consulta de neurología no experta en TM y por aquellos TMD que cursan con SPI normal (AU)

Objective: A non-degenerative etiology is supported by a normal SPI [normal SPECT with 123I-Ioflupane (SPI)] in a patient with movement disorders (MD). Method: A total of 196 SPIs were conducted during the period of 2004/05. Of these, 44 were selected in order to rule out degenerative MD (DMD), the results being normal in these patients. The clinical background of these patients were reviewed in a minimum period of 24 months (range 24-40), collecting the diagnoses reached by the neurology specialists. The SPI were evaluated using a consensus, according to subjective criteria and quantification. Results: Thirty-six of the 44 patients (81%) were identified at 2 years of having nondegenerative movement disorders: 18 as essential tremor, 5 as drug-induced disorder, 4 as vascular disease, 3 as peripheral polyneuropathy, 2 postural tremors, 1 writer's cramp, 1 psychogenic tremor, 1 intercranial hypertension and 1 fibromyalgia. The remaining 8 patients were diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in 5 cases, 1 corticobasal degeneration, 1 multisystemic atrophy and another degenerative Parkinsonism with unclear etiology. Conclusion: The SPI in our hospital has a lower negative predictive value than the data reported in the literature. The false negatives could be explained because most of our patients come from neurologist physicians who are not movement disorder experts. In addition, a small proportion of degenerative Parkinsonism could evolve with normal SPI (AU)