Brush cytology: a reliable method to detect Helicobacter pylori.

This study was conducted to verify the reliability of brush cytology in detecting Helicobacter pylori in an unselected group of patients with duodenal ulcer (DU) and nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD). Endoscopy was performed on 416 consecutive patients: group A, 94 with active DU; group B, 176 patients with DU after omeprazole (n = 78), ranitidine (n = 43), or triple anti-H. pylori therapy (n = 55); and group C, 146 patients with NUD. During endoscopy, the gastric mucosa was brushed and two biopsy samples from the antrum and body were obtained for histology. In 65 patients, culture of the brush-collected materials also was performed as was that from of biopsy samples. The overall frequency of H. pylori presence detected by brush cytology was significantly higher compared with that of histology (p < 0.001), particularly in group A (p < 0.05), group C (p < 0.05), and in patients with DU after omeprazole treatment (p < 0.01), but not in patients with DU after ranitidine or anti-H. pylori treatment. The overall frequency of H. pylori-positive cultures from the brush-collected material was higher compared with cultures from the biopsy samples (38.5% vs. 24.6%), particularly in the NUD group (32.6% vs. 16.3%). Brush cytology is more sensitive than histology, besides being faster and cheaper, for the assessment of H. pylori infection, particularly when the density of the bacteria is low.

Quality improvement in gastrointestinal endoscopy: microbiologic surveillance of disinfection.

BACKGROUND: Cleaning and disinfection procedures play an essential role in the prevention of infection transmission in gastrointestinal endoscopy. In spite of published detailed guidelines, several variants and weak points still exist. METHODS: Cleaning-disinfection procedures were carried out according to "Working Party, Sydney 1990." A microbiologic surveillance protocol tested the contamination of endoscopes and of automatic washing machines. To assess and improve the efficacy of disinfection, we adopted a quality assurance program. RESULTS: During a 2-year follow-up, the outside surfaces of gastroscopes were contaminated in 60.5% and channels in 41.3%; the outside areas of colonoscopes were contaminated in 62.3% and channels in 40.3%. Isolated bacteria were gram-negative organisms, particularly Pseudomonas species, and gram-positive organisms, mostly Staphylococcus species. The water reservoirs of automatic washing machines were frequently contaminated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The disinfection of washing machines and alcohol rinsing of endoscopes after standard procedures significantly reduced the bacterial contamination. CONCLUSIONS: The microbiologic surveillance pointed out the main weak points that could be improved by the adoption of corrective interventions. Quality assurance is a feasible method to assess the efficacy of cleaning-disinfection, and its wide application would improve quality of care.

[Recent data on the spread of Listeria spp. in the province of Ferrara]. / Ulteriori dati sulla diffusione di Listeria spp. in provincia di Ferrara.

The results of the investigations of Listeria held from 1985 to 1989 in samples of foods, surface waters and stools are reported. On the whole 98 strains of Listeria were isolated, 38 of which were L. monocytogenes. The first isolation of L. grayi from human stools is pointed out.