Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
AANA J ; 91(6): 449-454, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37987726

RESUMO

This systematic review was conducted to examine the value of the preoperative history and physical (H&P) examination and preoperative care prior to cataract extraction and the resulting outcomes of adverse events, patient experience, and cost. Four databases were searched using appropriate keywords from 2012 to 2022. Observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and quality improvement studies with data on the precataract H&P were included. Outcome measures were adverse events, cost, and patient experience. Of the 4,170 studies screened, 12 studies were included. Risk stratification of patients into a high-risk group with an H&P and a low-risk group without an H&P resulted in an increased incidence of minor adverse events in the low-risk group but did not increase the incidence of major adverse events or surgical adverse events. A short-term cost savings was reported, and patient experience was unchanged. In 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed the requirement for the precataract H&P within 30 days prior to ambulatory surgery, which has implications for surgery center policy. More research on the role of the preoperative H&P on patient experience, adverse events, cost, and outcomes should be conducted, given the methodological heterogeneity of this review.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Medicare , Redução de Custos , Exame Físico
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37880842

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma triage and transfer decisions should incorporate the likelihood that an injured child will require pediatric trauma center (PTC) resources. Resource utilization may be a better basis than mortality risk when evaluating pediatric injury severity. However, there is currently no consensus definition of PTC resource utilization that encompasses the full scope of PTC services. METHODS: Consensus criteria were developed in collaboration with the Pediatric Trauma Society (PTS) Research Committee using a modified Delphi approach. An expert panel was recruited representing the following pediatric disciplines: prehospital care, emergency medicine, nursing, general surgery, neurosurgery, orthopedics, anesthesia, radiology, critical care, child abuse, and rehabilitation medicine. Resource utilization criteria were drafted from a comprehensive literature review, seeking to complete the following sentence: "Pediatric patients with traumatic injuries have used PTC resources if they..." Criteria were then refined and underwent three rounds of voting to achieve consensus. Consensus was defined as agreement of 75% or more panelists. Between the second and third voting rounds, broad feedback from attendees of the PTS annual meeting was obtained. RESULTS: The Delphi panel consisted of 18 members from 15 institutions. Twenty initial draft criteria were developed based on literature review. These criteria dealt with airway interventions, vascular access, initial stabilization procedures, fluid resuscitation, blood product transfusion, abdominal trauma/solid organ injury management, intensive care monitoring, anesthesia/sedation, advanced imaging, radiologic interpretation, child abuse evaluation, and rehabilitative services. After refinement and panel voting, 14 criteria achieved the >75% consensus threshold. The final consensus criteria were reviewed and endorsed by the PTS Guidelines Committee. CONCLUSIONS: This study defines multidisciplinary consensus-based criteria for PTC resource utilization. These criteria are an important step toward developing a gold standard, resource-based, pediatric injury severity metric. Such metrics can help optimize system-level pediatric trauma triage based on likelihood of requiring PTC resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/STUDY TYPE: Level II, diagnostic test/criteria.

3.
AANA J ; 77(3): 208-11, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19645170

RESUMO

The minimally invasive Nuss procedure has become the standard of care for surgical correction of pectus excavatum. Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital deformity of the chest wall. Historically, surgical correction was limited to the Ravitch procedure, an invasive procedure associated with significant drawbacks, where abnormal cartilage was removed and the sternum elevated and stabilized. Patients typically experienced a prolonged recovery period, from 6 to 9 months and significant postoperative pain. The Nuss procedure, invented in 1998, is much less invasive and has a success rate of 90% compared with the Ravitch procedure with a success rate of 70% to 80%. This more recent procedure normally has an exceedingly low complication rate, reported to be 8% to 11%. Postoperative analgesia ranges from patient controlled analgesia to a thoracic epidural depending on the surgeon's preference. This case report details an immediate postoperative complication that occurred with its subsequent anesthetic management.


Assuntos
Anestesia por Inalação , Tórax em Funil/cirurgia , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Pneumotórax , Enfisema Subcutâneo , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Anestesia por Inalação/métodos , Anestesia por Inalação/enfermagem , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/enfermagem , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Enfermeiros Anestesistas , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Pneumotórax/prevenção & controle , Enfisema Subcutâneo/etiologia , Enfisema Subcutâneo/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...