[Experiencia inicial de Lanadelumab en una paciente mexicana con angioedema hereditario tipo I].

Background: Hereditary angioedema type 1 (HAE1) is an autosomal dominant disorder, characterized by quantitative and qualitative deficiency of C1 inhibitor, excessive production of bradykinin and causing recurrent angioedema in varying degrees of severity that affects quality of life and life itself. from the patients. Lanadelumab is a human monoclonal antibody, a specific inhibitor of plasma kallikrein, approved for long-term prophylaxis of HAE1. Case report: A 59-year-old female patient, diagnosed with HAE 1 since November 1987, without therapeutic response to danazol, fresh frozen plasma, or C1 inhibitor derived from intravenous plasma, requiring 3 to 9 monthly vials of icatibant acetate due to angioedema. laryngeal, cutaneous and visceral with highly altered quality of life indices. Lanadelumab 300 mg subcutaneously every 14 days was started. At the start of treatment, the AECT1 score was 1 point; AE-Qol2: 57 points, AAS3: 32 points, being followed up at 5, 10 and 12 months. After one year of treatment, the records showed an AECT1 of 19 points; AE-Qol2: 36 points and AAS3: 5 points. The requirement for icatibant acetate has been no more than 3 vials per month. Conclusion: In accordance with the literature, lanadelumab offered a significant decrease in angioedema activity and a significantly positive impact on the pa- tient's quality of life, confirming that lanadelumab is an effective option for long-term HAE prophylaxis. .

Antecedentes: El angioedema hereditario tipo 1 (AEH1) es un trastorno autosómico dominante, caracterizado por la carencia cuantitativa y cualitativa del C1 inhibidor, producción excedida de bradicinina y causar angioedema recurrente en diversos grados de severidad que afecta la calidad de vida y la vida misma de los pacientes. Lanadelumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal humano, inhibidor específico de la calicreína plasmática, aprobado para profilaxis a largo plazo del AEH1. Reporte de caso: Paciente femenino de 59 años, con diagnóstico de AEH 1 desde noviembre de 1987, sin respuesta terapéutica a danazol, plasma fresco con- gelado ni C1 inhibidor derivado del plasma intravenoso, requerimiento de 3 a 9 ampolletas mensuales de acetato de icatibant por angioedema laríngeo, cutáneo y visceral con índices de calidad de vida sumamente alterada. Se inició lanadelumab 300 mg cada 14 días subcutánea. Al inicio del tratamiento el puntaje de AECT1 fue de 1 punto; AE-Qol2:57 puntos, AAS3: 32 puntos, realizándose un seguimiento a los 5, 10 y 12 meses. Al año de tratamiento, los registros mostraron un AECT1 de 19 puntos; AE-Qol2: 36 puntos y AAS3: 5 puntos. El requerimiento de acetato de icatibant ha sido a no más de 3 ampolletas por mes. Conclusión: En concordancia a la literatura, lanadelumab ofreció al caso, una importante disminución de la actividad del angioedema y un impacto significativa- mente positivo en la calidad de vida de la paciente, constatando que lanadelumab es una opción eficaz en la profilaxis a largo plazo del AEH.

Economic burden of severe asthma treatment: A real-life study.

Background: Individuals with severe asthma represent 5%-10% of the general asthmatic population. Despite the use of biologic drugs during clinical management, inadequate control of the disease has translated into high economic impact. In Mexico, however, these costs have not yet been assessed. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in 2018 and 2019 at Regional Hospital Lic. Adolfo López Mateos, ISSSTE. The assessment of direct costs included pharmacological treatment, clinical tests, days of hospitalization, admissions to the emergency room, and scheduled consultations. The evaluation involved 2 groups of patients-with controlled severe asthma (CSA) and uncontrolled severe asthma (UCSA)-according to presence of exacerbations. Results: 60 patients (18-75 years old, 51 women) were included in the study. In 2018, 23 of them (38.3%) were categorized as belonging to the UCSA group; in 2019, 22 patients (36.7%) were in this condition (exacerbations: median = 1.5, maximum = 6). Of the 60 patients, 12 (20%) presented between 2 and 9 exacerbations in the study's two-year period (median = 3) after between 4 and 10 years (median = 7.8) of complementary anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) therapy with omalizumab. The cost for all patients in the 2018-2019 period was 993,289.60 USD. The mean cost per patient was higher for those with UCSA (16,392 USD) than for those with CSA (16,246 USD, p = 0.02). We found a positive association between cost and exacerbations, with an increase of 350 USD per exacerbation (p˂0.0001). Our results indicate that 62% of patients respond to complementary anti-IgE treatment, while 38%-and especially 20%-do not respond optimally to this treatment. Conclusions: Poor asthma control in this latter group of 38% of patients leads to lower quality of life and higher costs associated with pharmacological treatment.