Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 103(7): 487-492, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34192487

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, our emergency general surgery (EGS) service underwent significant restructuring, including establishing an enhanced ambulatory service and undertaking nonoperative management of selected pathologies. The aim of this study was to compare the activity of our EGS service before and after these changes. METHODS: Patients referred by the emergency department were identified prospectively over a 4-week period beginning from the date our EGS service was reconfigured (COVID) and compared with patients identified retrospectively from the same period the previous year (Pre-COVID), and followed up for 30 days. Data were extracted from handover documents and electronic care records. The primary outcomes were the rate of admission, ambulation and discharge. RESULTS: There were 281 and 283 patients during the Pre-COVID and COVID periods respectively. Admission rate decreased from 78.7% to 41.7%, while there were increased rates of ambulation from 7.1% to 17.3% and discharge from 6% to 22.6% (all p<0.001). For inpatients, mean duration of admission decreased (6.9 to 4.8 days), and there were fewer operative or endoscopic interventions (78 to 40). There were increased ambulatory investigations (11 to 39) and telephone reviews (0 to 39), while early computed tomography scan was increasingly used to facilitate discharge (5% vs 34.7%). There were no differences in 30-day readmission or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Restructuring of our EGS service in response to COVID-19 facilitated an increased use of ambulatory services and imaging, achieving a decrease of 952 inpatient bed days in this critical period, while maintaining patient safety.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgia Geral/organização & administração , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/transmissão , Tratamento Conservador/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento de Emergência/métodos , Tratamento de Emergência/normas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Cirurgia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Controle de Infecções/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/normas , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
BMC Med Ethics ; 21(1): 58, 2020 07 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32653008

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is an integral component of good medical practice. Many researchers have investigated measures to improve the quality of informed consent, but it is not clear which techniques work best and why. To address this problem, we propose developing a core outcome set (COS) to evaluate interventions designed to improve the consent process for surgery in adult patients with capacity. Part of this process involves reviewing existing research that has reported what is important to patients and doctors in the informed consent process. METHODS: This qualitative synthesis comprises four phases: identification of published papers and determining their relevance; appraisal of the quality of the papers; identification and summary of the key findings from each paper while determining the definitiveness of each finding against the primary data; comparison of key themes between papers such that findings are linked across studies. RESULTS: Searches of bibliographic databases returned 11,073 titles. Of these, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were published between 1996 and 2016 and included a total of 367 patients and 74 health care providers. Thirteen studies collected data using in-depth interviews and constant comparison was the most common means of qualitative analysis. A total of 94 findings were extracted from the primary papers and divided into 17 categories and ultimately 6 synthesised findings related to: patient characteristics, knowledge, communication, the model patient, trust and decision making. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative meta-aggregation is the first to examine the issue of informed consent for surgery. It has revealed several outcomes deemed important to capture by patients and clinicians when evaluating the quality of a consent process. Some of these outcomes have not been examined previously in research comparing methods for informed consent. This review is an important step in the development of a COS to evaluate interventions designed to improve the consent process for surgery. REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on the international prospective register for systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42017077101).


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Adulto , Humanos , Comunicação , Projetos de Pesquisa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...