Empirical analysis of a plan-of-the-day strategy to approximate daily online reoptimization for prostate CBCT-guided adaptive radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can improve the dose delivered to the patient in the presence of anatomic variations. However, the required time, effort, and clinical resources are intensive. This work analyzed a plan-of-the-day (POD) approach on clinical patients treated with online ART to explore implementations that balance dosimetric benefit and clinical resource cost. METHODS: Eight patients treated to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles with 26 fractions of CBCT-guided, daily online ART were retrospectively analyzed. With a plan library composed of daily adaptive plans from the initial week of treatment and the original plan, the effect of a POD approach starting the following week was investigated by simulating use of these previously generated plans under 3- and 6-degree-of-freedom patient alignment. The plan selected for each treatment was that from the library that maximized the Dice similarity coefficient of the clinical target volume with that of the current treatment fraction. The resulting distribution of several target coverage and organ-at-risk dose metrics are described relative to those achieved with the daily online reoptimized adaptive technique. RESULTS: The values of target coverage and organ-at-risk dose metrics varied across patients and metrics. The POD schemas closely approximated the reference values from a fully reoptimized adaptive plan yet required less than 20% of the reoptimization effort. The POD schemas also had a much greater effect on target coverage metrics than 6-degree-of-freedom registration did. Organ-at-risk dose metrics also varied considerably across patients but did not exhibit a consistent dependence on the particular schema. CONCLUSIONS: POD schemas were able to achieve the vast majority of the dosimetric benefit of daily online ART with a small fraction of the online reoptimization effort. Strategies like this might allow for more practical and strategic implementation of ART so as to benefit a greater number of patients.

Do needle syringe programs reduce HIV infection among injecting drug users: a comprehensive review of the international evidence.

This first international review of the evidence that needle syringe programs reduce HIV infection among injecting drug users found that conservative interpretation of the published data fulfills six of the nine Bradford Hill criteria (strength of association, replication of findings, temporal sequence, biological plausibility, coherence of evidence, and reasoning by analogy) and all six additional criteria (cost-effectiveness, absence of negative consequences, feasibility of implementation, expansion and coverage, unanticipated benefits, and application to special populations). The Bradford Hill criteria are often used to evaluate public health interventions. The principal finding of this review was that there is compelling evidence of effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness, consistent with seven previous reviews conducted by or on behalf of U.S. government agencies. Authorities in countries affected or threatened by HIV infection among injecting drug users should carefully consider this convincing evidence now available for needle syringe programs with a view to establishing or expanding needle syringe programs to scale.