Effect of physical therapy timing on patient-reported outcomes for individuals with acute low back pain: A systematic review with meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of early physical therapy (PT) for the management of acute low back pain (LBP) on patient-reported outcomes of pain and disability, compared to delayed PT or non-PT care. LITERATURE SURVEY: Randomized controlled trials in three electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase) were searched from inception to June 12, 2020, and updated on September 23, 2021. METHODOLOGY: Eligible participants were individuals with acute low back pain. The intervention was early PT compared to delayed PT or non-PT care. Primary outcomes included the patient-reported outcomes of pain and disability. The following information was extracted from included articles: demographic data, sample size, selection criteria, PT interventions, and pain and disability outcomes. Data were extracted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale. Random effects models were used for the meta-analysis. SYNTHESIS: Seven of 391 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Random effects meta-analysis comparing early PT to non-PT care for acute LBP indicated a significant reduction in pain (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.69 to -0.17) and disability (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.16) in the short term. Early PT compared to delayed PT did not result in improvement in short-term pain (SMD = -0.24, 95% CI: -0.52 to 0.04) or disability (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: -0.56 to 0.01), or long-term pain (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.57) or disability (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.15 to 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest early PT versus non-PT care is associated with statistically significant reductions in short-term pain and disability (up to 6 weeks) with small effect sizes. The results indicate a nonsignificant trend favoring a small benefit of early PT over delayed PT for outcomes at short-term follow-up but no effect at long-term follow-up (6 months or greater).

Economic and demographic predictors of dietary variation and nutritional indicators in Nicaragua.

OBJECTIVES: We measured carbon and nitrogen isotopic ratios in a contemporary population, and tested how the isotopic variability relates to measures of socioeconomic status (e.g., household wealth) and anthropometric measures (e.g., standardized height-for-age and weight-for-age z-scores). METHODS: Hair samples from individuals living in the Bosawas Biosphere Reserve in Nicaragua were analyzed for δ13 C and δ15 N, and these data were examined in relation to individual (e.g., age, sex, anthropometrics) and household (e.g., household size, wealth) variables. RESULTS: We found through mixed-effects modeling that δ13 C and δ15 N varied predictably with individual age and household wealth. δ13 C and δ15 N did not, however, improve models predicting variation in individual anthropometric measures. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that, although there is a relationship between diet (δ13 C and δ15 N) and socioeconomic variables, these dietary differences are not the main cause of health differences in this population.