Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 69(7): 1729-1737, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33834504

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary team (IDT) care is central to home-based primary care (HBPC) of frail elders. Traditionally, all HBPC disciplines managed a patient (Full IDT), a costly approach to maintain. The recent PACE (Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly) regulation provides for a flexible approach of annual assessments from a core team with involvement of additional disciplines dependent upon patient needs (Core+). Current Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) HBPC guidance specifies Full IDTs care for medically complex and functionally impaired Veterans similar to PACE participants. We evaluated whether VA HBPC has adopted the flexible structure of the PACE regulation, aligned to Veteran needs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: All 139 VA HBPC programs administered across 379 sites. PARTICIPANTS: About 55,173 Veterans enrolled in HBPC during fiscal year 2018. MEASUREMENTS: Patients' HBPC physician, nurse, psychologist/psychiatrist, social worker, therapist, dietitian, and pharmacist visits were grouped into interdisciplinary team types. Patient frailty was classified using VA HNHR v2 (High-Need High-Risk version 2, a measure of high, medium, and low risk of long-term institutionalization). Medical complexity was measured by clusters of impairment in the JEN frailty index (JFI). JFI clusters were validated by VA's Nosos measure to project cost and Care Assessment Need (CAN) measure of hospitalization and mortality risk. RESULTS: HBPC provided Full IDT care to 21%, Core+ care to 54%, and Home Health+ (HHA+) care (skilled home health services plus additional disciplines, without primary care) to 16% of Veterans. Team type was associated with medical complexity (X2 2863.5 [66 df], p < 0.0001). High-risk Veterans (72% of sample) were more likely to receive Full IDT care (X2 62.9, 1 df), p < 0.0001), while low-risk Veterans (28%) were more likely to receive HHA+ care (X2 314.8, 1 df, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between HBPC team patterns and patient frailty, indicating tailoring of care to match Veteran needs.


Assuntos
Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares/legislação & jurisprudência
2.
Home Healthc Nurse ; 25(5): 315-22, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17495561
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...