Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 62(1): 24-32, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35883261

RESUMO

Vaccine refusal is increasing. Objectives were to assess frequency of declining or dismissing patients who refuse vaccines, which vaccine(s) prompt pediatricians to decline/dismiss patients, and demographics of pediatricians who decline/dismiss patients. Active members of the Oklahoma American Academy of Pediatricians (AAP) were surveyed. Chi-square tests with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals compared proportions of providers across various metrics. In all, 47% (48/103) versus 35% (34/98) reported declining versus dismissing patients for refusing vaccines, respectively. Pediatricians were unlikely to decline/dismiss patients if they refused influenza, human papilloma virus (HPV), or MenB vaccines. Pediatricians with more years in practice were less likely to decline 15% (9/62) versus 44% (16/36), P = 0.002 and dismiss 8% (5/62) versus 33% (12/36), P = 0.002 patients. Rural pediatricians were less likely than urban to decline 12% (2/17) versus 29% (26/89), P = NS and dismiss patients 0% (0/17) versus 21% (19/89), P = 0.04. Dismissing/declining patients for vaccine refusal is more common among Oklahoma pediatricians than nationally reported. Patterns differ by practice setting, years in practice, and specific vaccine refused.


Assuntos
Pediatras , Vacinas , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Oklahoma , Recusa de Vacinação , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vacinação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde
2.
J Health Econ ; 56: 178-190, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29107198

RESUMO

We estimate the effect of county-level e-cigarette indoor vaping restrictions on adult prenatal smoking and birth outcomes using United States birth record data for 7 million pregnant women living in places already comprehensively banning the indoor use of traditional cigarettes. We use both cross-sectional and panel data to estimate our difference-in-difference models. Our panel model results suggest that adoption of a comprehensive indoor vaping restriction increased prenatal smoking by 2.0 percentage points, which is double the estimate obtained from a cross-sectional model. We also document heterogeneity in effect sizes along lines of age, education, and type of insurance.


Assuntos
Retardo do Crescimento Fetal/induzido quimicamente , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Vaping/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA