Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Xenotransplantation ; 9(2): 135-47, 2002 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11897006

RESUMO

Anti-pig antibodies (APA) were analysed in serum from 28 naïve wild-caught baboons (originating from Kenya) and 31 naïve captive-bred cynomolgus monkeys (13 from the Philippines and 18 from Mauritius), using a haemolytic assay with pig erythrocytes (APA), flow cytometry on the porcine lymphoma T-cell cell line L35, and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using alpha-Gal type II and type VI antigen. This was extended in baboon samples by the evaluation in two laboratories (Imutran, Cambridge, UK and Immerge, Boston, USA), and by antibody absorption using either immobilized alpha-Gal type II or alpha-Gal type VI. Anti-porcine antibodies were demonstrated in all assays with substantial variability within and between the three non-human primate groups. Immunoglobulin (Ig)M antibody levels tended to be similar to or higher than those in a pooled normal human standard serum while IgG levels tended to be lower. Highest antibody levels were recorded in Mauritius cynomolgus monkeys. There were statistically significant correlations between assays for IgM or IgG class anti-Gal antibodies using either alpha-Gal type II or alpha-Gal type VI as antigen, both for different assays and two laboratories involved. Also, significant correlations were observed between the anti-Gal and L35 binding assays. Baboon sera before and after absorption to immobilized alpha-Gal type II or type VI were analysed for anti-Gal type VI or type II antibody: levels were almost undetectable indicating that most anti-Gal antibodies react to epitopes shared between alpha-Gal type II and type VI oligosaccharides. Finally, the relation between APA and outcome of porcine heart xenotransplantation in cynomolgus monkeys and baboons showed no apparent relation between pre-transplant APA levels and the occurrence of hyperacute rejection (HAR) when compared with non-immunological cause of organ/recipient dysfunction or acute humoral xenograft rejection during the first 4 days post-transplantation or survival exceeding 4 days post-transplantation.


Assuntos
Dissacarídeos/imunologia , Isoanticorpos/sangue , Animais , Dissacarídeos/química , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Transplante de Coração , Isoanticorpos/imunologia , Macaca fascicularis , Papio , Suínos , Transplante Heterólogo
2.
Transplantation ; 73(6): 881-9, 2002 Mar 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11923687

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hyperacute rejection of solid organ pig xenografts in nonhuman primates has been overcome by using donors transgenic for human complement regulatory proteins, but grafts are still susceptible to humoral (antibody-mediated) rejection. We investigated whether circulating xenoreactive antibodies are a useful indicator of this xenograft rejection. METHODS: Five assays were employed in a retrospective analysis on 20 selected cynomolgus monkey recipients of renal xenografts transgenic for human decay-accelerating factor, with survival between 4 and 60 days. The assays included hemolytic and hemagglutination assays and the measurement of immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM binding to porcine endothelial cells and leukocytes, and to the Gal alpha 1-3Gal trisaccharide (Gal) antigen. To assess non-Gal-directed antibodies, sera were absorbed with a Gal-coated resin. A predictive value was defined as an increase in antibody levels before a decline in graft failure (>20% increase in creatinine levels) and humoral rejection in graft pathology. RESULTS: Data on hemolytic anti-pig antibody correlated with those on IgM antibody to endothelial cells, leukocytes, and Gal. In absorbed sera IgM and IgG antibody to endothelial cells and leukocytes correlated with each other, indicative for an elicited antibody response to non-Gal antigens. Sixteen animals showed humoral rejection, and in all but two animals one or more assays was considered of predictive value. On the other hand, increased antibody levels were noted in two animals without signs of rejection in graft pathology and in two cases with cellular xenograft rejection. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended to use multiple assays (preferably hemolytic, anti-Gal, and anti-endothelial cell) to be able to fully monitor the peripheral antibody responses in pig-to-primate xenograft recipients.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Heterófilos/sangue , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Transplante de Rim/imunologia , Transplante Heterólogo/imunologia , Animais , Animais Geneticamente Modificados , Formação de Anticorpos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Antígenos CD55/genética , Endotélio Vascular/imunologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/patologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Transplante de Rim/patologia , Macaca fascicularis , Estudos Retrospectivos , Suínos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...