Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based analysis of the impact of preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy on survival outcomes for T3N0 rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiation has been established as standard of care for T3/T4 node-positive rectal cancer. Recent work, however, has called into question the overall benefit of radiation for tumors with lower risk characteristics, particularly T3N0 rectal cancers. We retrospectively analyzed T3N0 rectal cancer patients and examined how outcomes differed according to the sequence of treatment received. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to analyze T3N0 rectal cancer cases diagnosed between 1998 and 2008. Treatment consisted of surgery alone (No RT), preoperative radiation followed by surgery (Neo-Adjuvant RT), or surgery followed by postoperative radiation (Adjuvant RT). Demographic and tumor characteristics of the three groups were compared using t-tests for the comparison of means. Survival information from the SEER database was utilized to estimate cause-specific survival (CSS) and to generate Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Multivariate analysis (MVA) of features associated with outcomes was conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression models with Adjuvant RT, Neo-Adjuvant RT, No RT, histological grade, tumor size, year of diagnosis, and demographic characteristics as covariates. RESULTS: 10-Year CSS estimates were 66.1% (95% CI 62.3-69.6%; P=0.02), 73.5% (95% CI 68.9-77.5%; P=0.02), and 76.1% (95% CI 72.4-79.4%; P=0.02), for No RT, Neo-Adjuvant RT, and Adjuvant RT, respectively. On MVA, Adjuvant RT (HR=0.688; 95% CI, 0.578-0.819; P<0.001) was associated with significantly decreased risk for cancer death. By contrast, Neo-Adjuvant RT was not significantly associated with improved cancer survival (HR=0.863; 95% CI, 0.715-1.043; P=0.127). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant RT was associated with significantly higher CSS when compared with surgery alone, while the benefit of Neo-Adjuvant RT was not significant. This indicates that surgery followed by Adjuvant RT may still be an important treatment plan for T3N0 rectal cancer with potentially significant survival advantages over other treatment sequences.

Transforming growth factor ß-1 (TGF-ß1) is a serum biomarker of radiation induced fibrosis in patients treated with intracavitary accelerated partial breast irradiation: preliminary results of a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To examine a relationship between serum transforming growth factor ß -1 (TGF-ß1) values and radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a prospective analysis of the development of RIF in 39 women with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0-I breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation via intracavitary brachytherapy (IBAPBI). An enzyme-linked immunoassay (Quantikine, R&D, Minneapolis, MN) was used to measure serum TGF-ß1 before surgery, before IBAPBI, and during IBAPBI. Blood samples for TGF-ß1 were also collected from 15 healthy, nontreated women (controls). The previously validated tissue compliance meter (TCM) was used to objectively assess RIF. RESULTS: The median time to follow-up for 39 patients was 44 months (range, 5-59 months). RIF was graded by the TCM scale as 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 5 of 20 patients (25%), 6 of 20 patients (30%), 5 of 20 patients (25%), and 4 of 20 patients (20%), respectively. The mean serum TGF-ß1 values were significantly higher in patients before surgery than in disease-free controls, as follows: all cancer patients (30,201 ± 5889 pg/mL, P=.02); patients with any type of RIF (32,273 ± 5016 pg/mL, P<.0001); and women with moderate to severe RIF (34,462 ± 4713 pg/mL, P<0.0001). Patients with moderate to severe RIF had significantly elevated TGF-ß1 levels when compared with those with none to mild RIF before surgery (P=.0014) during IBAPBI (P≤0001), and the elevation persisted at 6 months (P≤.001), 12 months (P≤.001), 18 months (P≤.001), and 24 months (P=.12). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of TGF-ß1 values predicting moderate to severe RIF was generated with an area under the curve (AUC)ROC of 0.867 (95% confidence interval 0.700-1.000). The TGF-ß1 threshold cutoff was determined to be 31,000 pg/mL, with associated sensitivity and specificity of 77.8% and 90.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TGF-ß1 levels correlate with the development of moderate to severe RIF. The pre-IBAPBI mean TGF-ß1 levels can serve as an early biomarker for the development of moderate to severe RIF after IBAPBI.

Assessment of pain as a sequela in patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation (IBAPBI): preliminary results of a prospective study.

To assess pain rates and relationship to radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) in patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation (IBAPBI). Thirty-nine patients treated with IBAPBI were assessed prospectively for development of pain pretreatment, 1 month post-IBAPBI, and every 6 months thereafter. A qualitative subjective Late Effects of Normal Tissue-Subjective Objective Management Analytical (LENT-SOMA) questionnaire assessed pain. Use of pain medications was assessed as "no", "sometimes", or "regularly". A quantitative objective validated pressure threshold (PTH) measured pain in the site of IBAPBI breast (index) and its mirror-image in the nonirradiated breast (control). A validated tissue compliance meter (TCM) quantitatively assessed RIF in the index and control breasts at all time points. Mean ΔPTH(kg) and ΔTCM(mm) values reflected mean difference between the index and control breasts. Median follow-up is 44 months (range 5-59 months). According to LENT-SOMA, pain occurred in 89% at 1 and 24 months, 67% at 30 months, 30% at 36 months, 29% at 40 months, and 20% at 48 months. No patient used pain medication "regularly" but the use "sometimes" decreased over time: 61% at 1 month, 42% at 18 and 24 months, 13% at 36 months, and 10% at 40 months. Mean ΔPTH values, compared to Δ0 kg at baseline, peaked in absolute value by 1 month to -1.36 kg (p < 0.0001), persisted after 18 months at -0.99 kg (p < 0.0001) and 24 months at -0.73 kg (p < 0.0001), and returned to nearly baseline by 40 months at -0.11 kg (p < 0.57). Mean ΔPTH and ΔTCM correlated significantly with subjective patient reports of pain at each time point (p < 0.0001). To date, this is the first report to prospectively assess pain employing quantitative and qualitative inventories in patients treated with IBAPBI. Pain is experienced in the majority of patients experienced pain within the first 2 years, sometimes requiring a medication, and though subsides, it may persist 4 years after IBAPBI.

Tissue compliance meter is a more reproducible method of measuring radiation-induced fibrosis than late effects of normal tissue-subjective objective management analytical in patients treated with intracavitary brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation: results of a prospective trial.

Identification of radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) remains a challenge with Late Effects of Normal Tissue-Subjective Objective Management Analytical (LENT-SOMA). Tissue compliance meter (TCM), a non-invasive applicator, may render a more reproducible tool for measuring RIF. In this study, we prospectively quantify RIF after intracavitary brachytherapy (IB) accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with TCM and compare it with LENT-SOMA. Thirty-nine women with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stages 0-I breast cancer, treated with lumpectomy and intracavitary brachytherapy delivered by accelerated partial breast irradiation (IBAPBI), were evaluated by two raters in a prospective manner pre-IBAPBI and every 6 months post-IBAPBI for development of RIF, using TCM and LENT-SOMA. TCM classification scale grades RIF as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe, corresponding to a change in TCM (ΔTCM) between the IBAPBI and nonirradiated breasts of ≤2.9, 3.0-5.9, 6.0-8.9, ≥9.0 mm, respectively. LENT-SOMA scale employs clinical palpation to grade RIF as 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe. Correlation coefficients-Intraclass (ICC), Pearson (r), and Cohen's kappa (κ)-were employed to assess reliability of TCM and LENT-SOMA. Multivariate and univariate linear models explored the relationship between RIF and anatomical parameters [bra cup size], antihormonal therapy, and dosimetric factors [balloon diameter, skin-to-balloon distance (SBD), V150, and V200]. Median time to follow-up from completion of IBAPBI is 3.6 years (range, 0.8-4.9 years). Median age is 69 years (range, 47-82 years). Median breast cup size is 39D (range, 34B-44DDD). Median balloon size is 41.2 cc (range, 37.6-50.0 cc), and median SBD is 1.4 cm (range, 0.2-5.5 cm). At pre-IBAPBI, TCM measurements demonstrate high interobserver agreement between two raters in all four quadrants of both breasts ICC ≥ 0.997 (95% CI 0.994-1.000). After 36 months, RIF is graded by TCM scale as 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 10/39 (26%), 17/39 (43%), 9/39 (23%), and 3/39 (8%) of patients, respectively. ΔTCM ≥6 mm (moderate-severe RIF) is statistically different from ΔTCM ≤3 mm (none-mild RIF) (p < 0.05). At 36 months post-IBAPBI, TCM measurements for two raters render ICC = 0.992 (95% CI 0.987-0.995) and r = 0.983 (p < 0.0001), whereas LENT-SOMA demonstrates κ = 0.45 (95% CI 0.18-0.80). SBD and V150 are the only factors closest to 0.05 significance of contributing to RIF. This prospective study indicates that TCM is a more reproducible method than LENT-SOMA in measuring RIF in patients treated with IBAPBI. This tool renders a promising future application in assessing RIF.

A case series and immunophenotypic analysis of CK20-/CK7+ primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) can be rather challenging; therefore, the immunohistochemical profile is important in confirming the microscopic diagnosis. Characteristic of the neuroendocrine and epithelial differentiation of MCC, antibodies to cytokeratin (CK) 20, CK7, epithelial membrane antigen, and neuron-specific enolase among others, are used in confirming the diagnosis. As reported in the literature, the majority of MCC express CK20 and are CK7 negative. Herein, we present a case series of seven patients with CK20-/CK7+ primary cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. METHODS: All cases of MCC with specific CK20-/CK7+ staining on file at a large Veterans' hospital and tertiary referral dermatopathology service were reviewed. All seven cases were analyzed for clinical, pathologic and immunophenotypic attributes. All specimens were submitted for immunohistochemical staining and interpreted by a single dermatopathologist. RESULTS: All the cases showed diffuse cytoplasmic staining for CK7 and positive staining for synaptophysin. CK20 and thyroid transcription factor-1 staining was negative. CONCLUSIONS: Herein we have presented a hitherto unreported group of patients with CK20-/CK7+ primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. The purpose of this case series is to describe a new immunophenotypic variant of MCC, while further expanding the differential diagnosis of tumors included in the subset of neoplasms showing CK20-/CK7+ staining.