Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty approximates healthy knee kinematics more closely than total knee arthroplasty.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are effective surgeries to treat end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Clinicians assume that TKA alters knee kinematics while UKA preserves native knee kinematics; however, few studies of in vivo kinematics have evaluated this assumption. This study used biplane radiography to compare side-to-side tibiofemoral kinematics during chair rise, stair ascent, and walking in 16 patients who received either TKA or UKA. We hypothesized that TKA knees would have significant kinematic changes and increased asymmetry with the contralateral knee, while UKA knee kinematics would not change after surgery and preoperative knee symmetry would be maintained. Native bone and implant motion were tracked using a volumetric model-based tracking technique. Six degrees of freedom kinematics were calculated throughout each motion. Kinematics were compared between the operated and contralateral knees pre- and post-surgery using a linear mixed-effects model. TKA knees became less varus with the tibia more medial, posterior, and distal relative to the femur. UKA knees became less varus with the tibia less lateral on average. Postoperative TKA knees were in less varus than UKA knees on average and at low flexion angles, with an internally rotated tibia during chair rise and stair ascent. At high flexion angles, the tibia was more medial and posterior after TKA than UKA. Side-to-side kinematic symmetry worsened after TKA but was maintained or improved after UKA. Greater understanding of kinematic differences between operated and contralateral knees after surgery may help surgeons understand why some patients remain unsatisfied with their new knees.

Categorical Risk Stratification for Neonatal Early Onset Sepsis using Suspected Intraamniotic Infection and the Newborn Exam.

Objective: To determine test characteristics of categorical risk stratification for early onset sepsis (EOS) using maternal criteria for suspected intraamniotic infection (IAI) and/or newborn exam and compare them to the EOS calculator. Study Design: Retrospective 1:3 case-control study of late preterm/term infants with bacterial culture growth obtained <72 hours of life. For categorical approach, infants of mothers with suspected IAI or equivocal/ill appearing were presumed high-risk for EOS and blood culture obtained. For calculator, estimated probability of EOS and care recommendations were recorded from online calculator. Test characteristics were compared with McNemar's test; recommendation for blood culture was considered a "positive" test. Result: 52 cases and 172 controls were included. Compared to the calculator, the categorical approach had higher sensitivity 90%(95%CI:79-96%) vs 67% (95%CI:54-79%) but lower specificity 85%(95%CI:78-89%) vs. 92%(95%CI:87-96%). 10% of cases were not identified by either. Conclusion: A categorical approach using suspected IAI/newborn exam offers good EOS discrimination and is comparable to the calculator.