Factor analysis of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in American Indian women.

The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is widely used to assess depressive symptoms in the general population. It lacks validation for widespread use within the American Indian population, however. To address this gap, we explored and confirmed the factor structure of the CES-D among a community sample of southeastern American Indian women. We analyzed data from a sample of 150 American Indian women ages 18-50 from a southeastern tribe who had complete responses on the CES-D as part of a larger cross-sectional, community-engaged study. We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the measure's validity. We examined EFA models ranging from one to five factors, with the four-factor structure yielding the best overall model fit (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.03). Differences between the four-factor EFA-retained structure from our sample and Radloff's four-factor structure emerged. Only the interpersonal factor was common to both factor structures. Our study findings confirm the validity of the original four-factor structure of the CES-D for younger adult American Indian women in the southeast. Contrasting findings with the EFA-retained structure, however, provide a more nuanced interpretation of our results.

Methodological Considerations in Scale Refinement with Diverse Populations: A Case Example Using the CES-D with a Community Sample of American Indian Women.

Although many psychometric assessments are used extensively in population-based research to determine psychopathology, these tools have not been thoroughly validated or appropriately adapted for use in diverse populations. Indeed, depression measurement studies among American Indian and female populations are scarce, omitting key opportunities to tailor psychological measurement for this population. To build psychometric evidence of measures in this population, we used a procedural method to examine a standard psychological instrument-the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)-with a community sample of southeast American Indian women. Our results showed strong psychometric reliability of the 20-item CES-D. The "effort" item presented diminished validity, as demonstrated by a negative counter-intuitive item-to-total correlation (ITC) value. Dropping the "effort" item resulted in a 19-item scale with a better fit in the within-group examination of community-based American Indian women. Compared to the 20-item CES-D scale, the revised 19-item measure ("effort" item removed) resulted in minimal changes to women's depression categories. However, we did detect patterns in shifts such that the 19-item scale generally underestimated (i.e., placed women in a lower category) depressive symptoms compared to the 20-item scale. Depending on their study goals, researchers engaging in population-based research should carefully weigh the use of original scales that allow for consistency in reporting with refined scales that fit psychometrically. We present the outlined method as a tool that expands on current approaches in scale refinement, and aids researchers in making more informed decisions regarding refined scales with diverse populations.

Bibliometrics approach to evaluating the research impact of CTSAs: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: To enhance the performance evaluation of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs, we examined the utility of advanced bibliometric measures that go beyond simple publication counts to demonstrate the impact of translational research output. METHODS: The sampled data included North Carolina Translational and Clinical Science Institute (NC TraCS)-supported publications produced between September 2008 and March 2017. We adopted advanced bibliometric measures and a state-of-the-art bibliometric network analysis tool to assess research productivity, citation impact, the scope of research collaboration, and the clusters of research topics. RESULTS: Totally, 754 NC TraCS-supported publications generated over 24,000 citation counts by April 2017 with an average of 33 cites per article. NC TraCS-supported research papers received more than twice as many cites per year as the average National Institute of Health-funded research publications from the same field and time. We identified the top productive researchers and their networks within the CTSA hub. Findings demonstrated the impact of NC TraCS in facilitating interdisciplinary collaborations within the CTSA hub and across the CTSA consortium and connecting researchers with right peers and organizations. CONCLUSION: Both improved bibliometrics measures and bibliometric network analysis can bring new perspectives to CTSA evaluation via citation influence and the scope of research collaborations.

A community-engaged approach to investigate cardiovascular-associated inflammation among American Indian women: A research protocol.

American Indian women are more likely to die from cardiovascular disease (CVD) than White or African American women. Inflammatory processes may underlie CVD disparities by gender and race and may be critical to understanding population-specific drivers and potential buffers. Exposure to environmental air pollutants, especially particulate matter (PM), is known to be an important catalyst in CVD-associated inflammation. Positive psychological states, associated with low levels of inflammatory gene expression, could serve to moderate the inflammatory response to environmental air pollutants and ultimately lead to better cardiovascular health outcomes. The aim of the ongoing community-engaged and NIH-funded study described in this study protocol is to address the racial and gender gaps in CVD mortality by investigating the contextually relevant and culturally important determinants of health among American Indian women. In this paper we describe the procedures used to examine the relationship between environmental air pollutant exposures (PM10-2.5 and PM 2.5 ), psychological factors (e.g., depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress symptoms, eudemonic well-being, and positive emotions), and cardiovascular-associated inflammation (hs-CRP, IL-6, Amyloid A, CBCs with differentials) in a sample of 150 women 18-50 years of age from the Lumbee Tribe in southeastern North Carolina. We describe lessons learned and strategies used in developing a community-engaged approach to enhance recruitment of American Indian women in biomedical research. The empirical data and community infrastructure resulting from this study will be foundational in designing and testing future interventions to reduce CVD-associated morbidity and mortality in American Indian women.

Connecting communities to health research: development of the Project CONNECT minority research registry.

INTRODUCTION: Prevention and treatment standards are based on evidence obtained in behavioral and clinical research. However, racial and ethnic minorities remain relatively absent from the science that develops these standards. While investigators have successfully recruited participants for individual studies using tailored recruitment methods, these strategies require considerable time and resources. Research registries, typically developed around a disease or condition, serve as a promising model for a targeted recruitment method to increase minority participation in health research. This study assessed the tailored recruitment methods used to populate a health research registry targeting African-American community members. METHODS: We describe six recruitment methods applied between September 2004 and October 2008 to recruit members into a health research registry. Recruitment included direct (existing studies, public databases, community outreach) and indirect methods (radio, internet, and email) targeting the general population, local universities, and African American communities. We conducted retrospective analysis of the recruitment by method using descriptive statistics, frequencies, and chi-square statistics. RESULTS: During the recruitment period, 608 individuals enrolled in the research registry. The majority of enrollees were African American, female, and in good health. Direct and indirect methods were identified as successful strategies for subgroups. Findings suggest significant associations between recruitment methods and age, presence of existing health condition, prior research participation, and motivation to join the registry. CONCLUSIONS: A health research registry can be a successful tool to increase minority awareness of research opportunities. Multi-pronged recruitment approaches are needed to reach diverse subpopulations.

Perceptions of pediatric clinical research among African American and Caucasian parents.

Difficulty in recruiting African American adults for clinical trials is well documented, but there is no consensus on African American children. Responses of a survey completed by 90 African American and Caucasian parents from December 2004 to April 2005 were analyzed to determine if racial disparities exist in research participation interest in an academic pediatric dermatology clinic. The majority of questions (32 of 38) were answered similarly by subjects of both races. However, when compared to African Americans, Caucasians were slightly more trusting (84% vs 65%) in regard to either total or moderate trust (p = .03). African Americans were 3 times as likely to feel that their child might be "treated like a guinea pig" if the child was a research subject (p = .03). Nearly a third more Caucasians than African Americans would be more inclined to enroll their healthy child in a research study if they had an established relationship with the health care provider informing them of the study (p = .0001). Caucasians had more exposure to research (p = .03). Nevertheless, there was no racial difference in the willingness to theoretically allow their child to participate in research studies. Accordingly, the possible lack of trust should not be used as the only reason racially representative recruitment goals are not accomplished.

Psychosocial stress and 13-year BMI change among blacks: the Pitt County Study.

Adverse psychosocial exposures may partially drive the high rates of obesity among blacks. The objective of this study was to prospectively examine the relationship between perceived psychosocial stress and percent change in BMI among adult black men and women. We used data from 756 women and 416 men who were participants in the Pitt County Study, a community-based, prospective cohort study of blacks in eastern North Carolina. Participants were aged 25-50 years of age on entry into the study in 1988 and follow-up was obtained in 2001. Using multivariable linear regression, we calculated the adjusted mean percentage change in BMI over the follow-up period for each tertile of baseline measures of the Perceived Stress Scale (low, medium, and high), adjusted for potential confounders. For black women, higher levels of psychosocial stress at baseline predicted higher adjusted percentage increase in BMI over the 13-year follow-up: low stress 12.0% (95% CI 9.6-14.4), medium stress 16.3% (95% CI 13.7-18.9), and high stress 15.5% (95% CI 13.1-17.8). For black men, perceived stress was not associated with percent BMI change. These data suggest that interventions targeting obesity in black women should consider the potential impact of emotional stress on weight change.

Participation in research studies: factors associated with failing to meet minority recruitment goals.

PURPOSE: To determine the recruitment goals that investigators set for racial/ethnic minorities and the factors associated with failure to meet those goals. METHODS: Four hundred forty principal investigators (PIs) conducting clinical research funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in 2001 completed a mailed survey providing their minority recruitment goals and enrollment data for their most recent NHLBI-funded study. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of PIs set goals for African Americans, 68% for Hispanics, 55% for Asian Americans, 35% for Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, and 23% of PIs set recruitment goals for American Indians/Native Alaskans. Among those PIs who did set minority recruitment goals, the mean goal for the recruitment of African Americans was 31%, 16% for Hispanics, and 9% for Asian Americans. Twenty-seven percent of PIs failed to meet their recruitment goals for African Americans, 23% for Asian Americans, and 23% for Hispanics. After adjusting for multiple investigator and trial characteristics, the type of study (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2, 3.4 for observational vs. phase III trial) completion of study enrollment (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2, 3.4), and PI identification of a larger number of major barriers to participation (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1, 3.0) were all associated with failure to meet recruitment goals for African Americans. However, no factors were consistently associated with failure to meet recruitment goals across different racial/ethnic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators often do not set recruitment goals for some racial/ethnic groups. Factors associated with failure to meet recruitment goals vary in the recruitment of different minority groups.

Investigators' assessment of NIH mandated inclusion of women and minorities in research.

BACKGROUND: While investigators were concerned about the impact of mandated inclusion of minorities and women on the conduct of research, there has been little subsequent assessment of investigator views on the effectiveness of the mandate in achieving gender and racial/ethnic research diversity. We describe investigators' assessment of the impact of the mandate on inclusion of women and minorities in research. METHODS: 440 principal investigators (PIs) surveyed between August 2002 and December 2002. RESULTS: Most PIs (69%) felt the mandate has been successful in increasing gender diversity, 7% felt that the mandate had failed to increase females and 24% were unsure. Fifty-five percent of PIs felt the mandate had been successful in increasing minorities; 12% felt it had failed and 32% were unsure. Those who felt that failure to include women makes it hard to draw conclusions about treatment/prevention strategies (P=0.05), white PIs (P=0.05), and those who ascribed importance to female inclusion (P=0.03) were more positive about the mandate's success for women. Similarly, those who felt more strongly that diversity in study samples ensures generalizability (P=0.03), white PIs (P=0.01), and those who ascribed importance to minority inclusion (P<0.01) were more positive about the mandate's success for minorities. CONCLUSION: While the majority of PIs were positive in their assessment of the mandate on increasing diversity in research, many were ambivalent. Greater clarity on the criteria the scientific community should use in assessing the effectiveness of the mandate would allow us to reach the mandate goals.

African American patients' perspectives on medical decision making.

BACKGROUND: The medical literature offers little information about how older African Americans view the medical decision-making process. We sought to describe the perspectives of older African American patients in a primary care clinic as they consider a medical decision. METHODS: We interviewed 25 African American patients older than 50 years who had discussed flexible sigmoidoscopy with their primary care provider. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative methods. RESULTS: Patients listed concerns about cancer and health, risks and benefits, their own understanding of the test, and the recommendation of the provider as the most important factors in their decision. Most patients wanted information about medical tests and procedures to increase their understanding and to provide reassurance rather than to guide decision making. Most patients explained that they wanted the provider to make medical decisions because of his or her training and experience. Despite this, many expressed a sense of ownership or control over one's own body. Patients thought trust was built by a health care provider's honesty, patience, kindness, interest, and continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS: Although traditional models of informed consent have emphasized providing patients with information to guide autonomous decision making, patients may want this information for other reasons. Fully informing patients about their medical condition increases understanding and provides reassurance. Because many of these patients want their provider to participate in making medical decisions, he or she should not only provide information but should also provide guidance to the patient.