Intermittent antegrade cardioplegia: isolated heart preservation with the Asporto heart preservation device.

BACKGROUND: A major problem in procurement of donor hearts is the limited time a donor heart remains viable. After cardiectomy, ischemic hypoxia is the main cause of donor heart degradation. The global myocardial ischemia causes a cascade of oxygen radical formation that cumulates in an elevation in hydrogen ions (decrease in pH), irreversible cellular injury, and potential microvascular changes in perfusion. OBJECTIVE: To determine the changes of prolonged storage times on donor heart microvasculature and the effects of intermittent antegrade perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using porcine hearts flushed with a Ribosol-based cardioplegic solution, we examined how storage time affects microvascular myocardial perfusion by using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at a mean (SD) of 6.1 (0.6) hours (n = 13) or 15.6 (0.6) hours (n = 11) after cardiectomy. Finally, to determine if administration of cardioplegic solution affects pH and microvascular perfusion, isolated hearts (group 1, n = 9) given a single antegrade dose, were compared with hearts (group 2, n = 8) given intermittent antegrade cardioplegia (150 mL, every 30 min, 150 mL/min) by a heart preservation device. Khuri pH probes in left and right ventricular tissue continuously measured hydrogen ion levels, and perfusion intensity on magnetic resonance images was plotted against time. RESULTS: Myocardial perfusion measured via magnetic resonance imaging at 6.1 hours was significantly greater than at 15.6 hours (67% vs 30%, P = .00008). In group 1 hearts, the mean (SD) for pH at the end of 6 hours decreased to 6.2 (0.2). In group 2, hearts that received intermittent antegrade cardioplegia, pH at the end of 6 hours was higher at 6.7 (0.3) (P = .0005). Magnetic resonance imaging showed no significant differences between the 2 groups in contrast enhancement (group 1, 62%; group 2, 40%) or in the wet/dry weight ratio. CONCLUSION: Intermittent perfusion maintains a significantly higher myocardial pH than does a conventional single antegrade dose. This difference may translate into an improved quality of donor hearts procured for transplantation, allowing longer distance procurement, tissue matching, improved outcomes for transplant recipients, and ideally a decrease in transplant-related costs.

A comparison of myocardial perfusion and rejection in cardiac transplant patients.

INTRODUCTION: Although histological evaluation of the cardiac tissue is the current gold standard for evaluation of rejection, we hypothesized that cardiac perfusion MRI is a safe non-invasive method that correlates tissue blood flow changes with biopsy proven rejection in the cardiac transplant patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study from 1984-2001, 83 patients underwent 135 MR Gd-DTPA imaging studies. In 8 patients (9%), biopsies graded 2 or higher (by ISHLT criteria) provided evidence of rejection. Patients were age and sex matched to 11 non-rejected controls for imaging analysis. Time-signal intensity curves generated for a mid-ventricle LV short axis slice during rest and adenosine stress allowed determination of myocardial blood flow (MBF, ml/min/gm). ROC curve analysis by SPSS allowed estimation of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: At rest, there was no difference in MBF between patients with prior rejection vs. those without (1.18 +/- 0.26 vs. 1.16 +/- 0.29). At stress there was a decrease in MBF for patients with prior rejection episodes (3.27 +/- 0.74) compared to no rejection (3.60 +/- 0.72), P = 0.067). The area under the ROC curve was 0.82, with specificity and sensitivity of 75% and 81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that perfusion MR imaging can be used in assessing the cardiac transplant patient for rejection related microvascular changes. The high specificity and sensitivity recorded from the ROC curve illustrates the potential utility of this diagnostic test for future studies.