RESUMO
The purpose was to compare plate and screw fixation (open reduction internal fixation [ORIF]) and functional bracing (FB) of isolated humeral shaft fractures with treatment and patient-based outcomes. We performed a prospective trial of ORIF v. FB at 12 centers. Surgeons counseled patients on treatment options and a patient centered decision was made. We enrolled 179 patients, of which 6-month data was analyzed for 102 (39 female; 63 male). Forty-five were treated with ORIF and 57 with FB. We found no difference in the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, visual analogue score (VAS) or elbow range of motion (ROM) at 6 months. However, 11% of the FB group developed nonunion. Complications in the ORIF group included a 2% infection and nonunion rate and 13% iatrogenic radial nerve dysfunction (RND). ORIF can be expected to result in higher union rates with the inherent risks of infection and RND. Finally, at 6 months, both groups demonstrated higher DASH scores than population norms, indicating a lack of full recovery. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(2):067-072, 2021).
Assuntos
Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas do Úmero , Placas Ósseas , Feminino , Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero/cirurgia , Úmero , Masculino , Redução Aberta , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Our purpose was to evaluate radiographic alignment of nonoperatively treated humerus fractures and determine if there is a critical angle associated with worse outcomes. All patients with humeral shaft fractures that were prospectively followed as part of a larger multicenter trial were reviewed. These patients were selected for nonoperative management based on shared decision making. There were 80 patients that healed with adequate data. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) had best fit with a sagittal radiographic angle of 10° (AUC: 0.731) and coronal angle of 15° (AUC: 0.580) at 1-year follow-up. We found increased or worse disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scores with > 10° sagittal alignment or > 15° of coronal alignment. Poor DASH scores were observed at angles lower than previously accepted for nonoperative treatment. These findings are useful in decision making and patient guidance. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(2):073-077, 2021).
Assuntos
Fraturas do Úmero , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fraturas do Úmero/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Úmero/terapia , Úmero , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia (TP) is associated with higher incidence of bleeding in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Herein, we report a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of baseline thrombocytopenia (bTP) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: Literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov from inception till October 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: Patients with (a) no Thrombocytopenia (nTP) (b) bTP before PCI. Primary endpoints were in-hospital, and all-cause mortality rates at the longest follow-up. The main summary estimate was random effects risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 6,51,543 patients from 10 retrospective studies were included. There was increased in-hospital all-cause mortality (RR 2.58 [1.7-3.8], p < .001) and bleeding (RR 2.37 [1.41-3.98], p < .005), in the bTP group compared to the nTP group. There was no difference for in-hopsital major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE) (RR 1.38 [0.94-2.0], p < .10), post-PCI MI (RR 1.17 [0.9-1.5], p = .19) and TVR (RR 1.65 [0.8-3.6], p = .21), respectively. Outcomes at longest follow-up showed increased incidence of all-cause mortality (RR 1.86 [1.2-2.9], p < .006) and bleeding (RR 1.72 [1.1-2.9], p = .04) in bTP group, while there was no significant difference for post-PCI MI (RR 1.07 [0.91-1.3], p = .42), MACE (RR 1.86 [0.69-1.8], p = .68) and TVR (RR 1.1 [0.9-1.2], p = .93) between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: bTP in patients undergoing PCI is associated with increased mortality and predicts risk of bleeding.
Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trombocitopenia/diagnóstico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The impact of orthopedic injuries in the elderly patient with multi-trauma and the effect of operative fixation on these injuries have not been thoroughly evaluated. METHODS: We reviewed geriatric patients (aged 65 and older) between 2004 and 2010 at a level 1 trauma center who sustained high-energy polytrauma (injury and severity score [ISS] ≥ 16) with associated orthopedic injuries. Patients were excluded if they had severe head and spine injuries, died on arrival, or had low-energy mechanisms of injury. Logistic regression was conducted to identify factors that predict mortality. RESULTS: There were 154 patients who comprised our study group with an average age of 76 years and an ISS of 23. There were 96 males and 58 females. Overall, 52 patients died within 1 year of their admission: 21 patients during their initial hospital stay and 31 patients within 1 year following admission. In all, 64 (42%) patients underwent operative stabilization of their orthopedic injuries. Increased mortality was seen (P < .05) in female patients, those with lower admission Glasgow coma score, and those who underwent orthopedic surgery. Patients had worse outcomes if they sustained femur (P = .014), clavicle, or scapular fractures (P = .027). Other factures associated with higher mortality included pelvic/acetabular injury requiring surgery (P = .019) or spine fractures treated nonoperatively (P = .014). CONCLUSION: The effect of orthopedic injuries on this geriatric polytrauma group contribute to worse outcomes when they included clavicle, scapula, and femur fractures. We also found that pelvic/acetabular fractures treated operatively and nonoperative spine fractures were associated with higher mortality rates. Risk/benefit consideration is suggested when contemplating operative intervention in these patients.