Regional Salvage Flap Options in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Microvascular free tissue transfer is the standard in the complex head and neck reconstruction with success rates greater than 95%. Free tissue transfer allows for more versatility in reconstructing complex defects with better tissue match. Failures, however, do occur and subsequent free tissue transfer might not be an option due to either the patients' health or in a vessel depleted neck. In these challenging salvage scenarios, the head and neck reconstructive surgeon must turn to regional flaps for reconstruction. Here, we review multiple regional flap options for salvage head and neck reconstruction.

Postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can successfully support patients following upper airway reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring intensive upper airway reconstruction are anatomically restricted in terms of the respiratory support they can receive. While intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been effectively utilized, little has been shown regarding the utility of ECMO for long-term support in these patients. METHODS: We demonstrate how a patient with tongue and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma that necessitated upper airway reconstruction was supported with veno-venous (VV) ECMO due to postoperative respiratory failure and an inability to maintain a stable airway. RESULTS: By initiating VV ECMO, we were able to decrease positive pressure ventilation and FiO2 , thereby minimizing ventilator-associated trauma and irritation to facilitate wound healing. Over time, ventilatory support was increased in parallel with decreasing ECMO support, allowing discharge to rehabilitation after 74 days of ECMO. CONCLUSION: ECMO can effectively support patients with ongoing respiratory requirements following upper airway reconstruction when standard ventilatory techniques are inadequate or not feasible.

Global Sensory Impairment Predicts Morbidity and Mortality in Older U.S. Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate global sensory impairment (GSI, an integrated measure of sensory dysfunction) as a predictor of physical function, cognition, overall health, and mortality. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: The National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. PARTICIPANTS: A national probability sample of 3,005 home-dwelling older U.S. adults assessed at baseline (2005-06) and 5-year follow-up (2010-11). MEASUREMENTS: Gait speed, activity, disability, cognition, overall health, 5-year mortality. RESULTS: At baseline, older adults with worse GSI were slower (Timed Up and Go times: odds ratio (OR) = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.17-1.50) and had more activity of daily living deficits (≥2: OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.10-1.46). Five years later, they were still slower (timed walk: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.05-1.42), had more disabilities (≥2 instrumental activities of daily living; OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.23-1.70), were less active (daytime activity according to accelerometry: ß = -2.7, 95% CI = -5.2 to -0.2), had worse cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment; ß = -0.64, 95% CI = -0.84 to -0.44), more likely to have poorer overall health (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03-1.31) and lose weight (>10%: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.04-1.64), and have died (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.19-1.76). All analyses were adjusted for relevant confounders at baseline, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, education, smoking, problem drinking, body mass index, comorbidities, and cognitive function. CONCLUSION: GSI predicts impaired physical function, cognitive dysfunction, significant weight loss, and mortality 5 years later in older U.S. adults. Multisensory evaluation may identify vulnerable individuals, offering the opportunity for early intervention to mitigate adverse outcomes.

Global Sensory Impairment in Older Adults in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there may be a common mechanism resulting in global sensory impairment of the five classical senses (vision, smell, hearing, touch, and taste) in older adults. DESIGN: Representative, population-based study. SETTING: National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling U.S. adults aged 57 to 85. MEASUREMENTS: The frequency with which impairment co-occurred across the five senses was estimated as an integrated measure of sensory aging. It was hypothesized that multisensory deficits would be common and reflect global sensory impairment that would largely explain the effects of age, sex, and race on sensory dysfunction. RESULTS: Two-thirds of subjects had two or more sensory deficits, 27% had just one, and 6% had none. Seventy-four percent had impairment in taste, 70% in touch, 22% in smell, 20% in corrected vision, and 18% in corrected hearing. Older adults, men, African Americans, and Hispanics had greater multisensory impairment (all P < .01). Global sensory impairment largely accounted for the effects of age, sex, and race on the likelihood of impairment in each of the five senses. CONCLUSION: Multisensory impairment is prevalent in older U.S. adults. These data support the concept of a common process that underlies sensory aging across the five senses. Clinicians assessing individuals with a sensory deficit should consider further evaluation for additional co-occurring sensory deficits.

Power and limitations of daily prognostications of death in the medical ICU for outcomes in the following 6 months.

OBJECTIVES: We tested the power of clinicians' predictions that a medical ICU patient would "die before hospital discharge" for both survival to discharge and for outcomes at 6 months. DESIGN: We restricted our analyses to patients who had been in the medical ICU at least 72 hours and for whom we had follow-up at 6 months after medical ICU admission. For 350 medical ICU patients, on each medical ICU day, we asked their attending physician, fellow, resident, and primary nurse one question-"do you think this patient will die in hospital or survive to be discharged"? We correlated these responses with 6-month outcomes (death and/or Barthel score for survivors). RESULTS: We obtained over 6,000 predictions on 2,271 medical ICU patient-days. Of 350 medical ICU patients who stayed more than 72 hours, 143 patients (41%) had discordant predictions-that is, on the same medical ICU day, at least one provider predicted survival, whereas another predicted death before discharge. As we have shown previously, predictions of "death before discharge" were imperfect-only 104 of 187 of patients with a prediction of death (56%) actually died in hospital. However, this is the central finding of our study, and predictions of death before discharge were much more accurate for 6-month outcomes. Of 120 patients with a corroborated prediction of death before discharge (93%), 112 patients had died within 6 months of medical ICU discharge, and only 4% were functioning with a Barthel score more than 70. In contrast, 67 of 163 patients who did not have any prediction of death before discharge (41%) were alive with Barthel score more than 70 at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 4% of medical ICU patients who required 72 hours of medical ICU care and had a corroborated prediction of death before discharge were alive at 6 months and functioning with a Barthel score more than 70.