Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy in central Mozambique.

PROBLEM: New WHO strategies for control of malaria in pregnancy (MiP) recommend intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp), bednet use and improved case management. APPROACH: A pilot MiP programme in Mozambique was designed to determine requirements for scale-up. LOCAL SETTING: The Ministry of Health worked with a nongovernmental organization and an academic institution to establish and monitor a pilot programme in two impoverished malaria-endemic districts. RELEVANT CHANGES: Implementing the pilot programme required provision of additional sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), materials for directly observed SP administration, bednets and a modified antenatal card. National-level formulary restrictions on SP needed to be waived. The original protocol required modification because imprecision in estimation of gestational age led to missed SP doses. Multiple incompatibilities with other health initiatives (including programmes for control of syphilis, anaemia and HIV) were discovered and overcome. Key outputs and impacts were measured; 92.5% of 7911 women received at least 1 dose of SP, with the mean number of SP doses received being 2.2. At the second antenatal visit, 13.5% of women used bednets. In subgroups (1167 for laboratory analyses; 2600 births), SP use was significantly associated with higher haemoglobin levels (10.9 g/dL if 3 doses, 10.3 if none), less malaria parasitaemia (prevalence 7.5% if 3 doses, 39.3% if none), and fewer low-birth-weight infants (7.3% if 3 doses, 12.5% if none). LESSONS LEARNED: National-level scale-up will require attention to staffing, supplies, bednet availability, drug policy, gestational-age estimation and harmonization of vertical initiatives.

Prevalence and predictors of maternal peripheral malaria parasitemia in central Mozambique.

Malaria infection during pregnancy (MiP) is heterogeneously distributed even in malaria-endemic countries. Program planners require data to facilitate identification of highest-priority populations for MiP control. Using data from two cross-sectional studies of 5,528 pregnant women in 8 neighboring sites in Mozambique, we described factors associated with maternal peripheral parasitemia by using logistic regression. Principal multivariate predictors of maternal peripheral parasitemia were gravidity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.60-3.26 for primigravidae and OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.29-2.01 for secundigravidae compared with gravidity > or = 3); age (OR = 0.96 per year, 95% CI = 0.94-0.99); study site (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.34-1.56 to 5.32, 95% CI = 4.92-5.75) for comparison with the reference site; and no maternal education (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.15-1.66) compared with any education. Other predictors (in subgroups) were bed net use (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.48-0.50); preventive sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine doses (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.24-0.25); and infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.11-2.00). Programmatic priorities should respond to heterogeneous distribution of multiple risk factors, including prevalence of malaria and infection with HIV, and maternal socioeconomic status.

Prevalence and predictors of maternal peripheral malaria parasitemia in central Mozambique

Malaria infection during pregnancy (MiP) is heterogeneously distributed even in malaria-endemic countries. Program planners require data to facilitate identification of highest-priority populations for MiP control. Using data from two cross-sectional studies of 5,528 pregnant women in 8 neighboring sites in Mozambique, we described factors associated with maternal peripheral parasitemia by using logistic regression. Principal multivariate predictors of maternal peripheral parasitemia were gravidity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.60-3.26 for primigravidae and OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.29-2.01 for secundigravidae compared with gravidity > or = 3); age (OR = 0.96 per year, 95% CI = 0.94-0.99); study site (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.34-1.56 to 5.32, 95% CI = 4.92-5.75) for comparison with the reference site; and no maternal education (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.15-1.66) compared with any education. Other predictors (in subgroups) were bed net use (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.48-0.50); preventive sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine doses (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.24-0.25); and infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.11-2.00). Programmatic priorities should respond to heterogeneous distribution of multiple risk factors, including prevalence of malaria and infection with HIV, and maternal socioeconomic status

Lessons learned from bednet distribution in Central Mozambique.

INTRODUCTION: Malaria is an important cause of mortality and morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa. Use of insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) is an important preventive intervention. Selection of the best mechanisms for distribution and promotion of ITNs to vulnerable populations is an important strategic issue. METHODS: Commercial shopkeepers and groups of community leaders were trained to promote and sell ITNs in 19 sites in central Mozambique between 2000 and 2004. Pregnant women and children under 5 years of age comprised the target population. Sales records, household survey results and project experiences were examined to derive 'lessons learned'. PRIMARY OUTCOME: An end-of-project household survey revealed that 40.8% of households owned one or more bednets, but only 19.6% of households owned a net that had been re-treated with insecticide within the preceding 6 months. Higher levels of bednet (treated or untreated) coverage (over 50%) were achieved in urban or peri-urban sites than in rural sites (as low as 15%). Bednet ownership was significantly associated with higher socio-economic status (odds ratios for association with bednet ownership: 5.6 for highest educational level compared with no education, 0.4 for dirt floor compared with cement or other finished flooring, 2.1 for automobile ownership compared with transportation on foot), but was negatively associated with the presence of young children in the household (odds ratio 0.5). Primary output: 23 000 ITNs were sold during the course of the project. Process lessons: Nearly all of the community leader sites failed and were replaced by shopkeepers or Ministry of Health personnel. Sales were most brisk in more prosperous urban and peri-urban sites (up to 147 nets/month) but were significantly slower in poorer, rural sites (as low as three nets/month). Remote rural sites with slow sales were more expensive to serve. Logistical difficulties were related to tariffs, transport, management of cash, warehousing and organization of re-treatment campaigns. CONCLUSIONS: This project failed to achieve adequate or equitable levels of ITN coverage in a timely manner in the programme sites. However, its findings helped support a subsequent Mozambican decision to conduct targeted distribution of long-lasting nets to the neediest populations in the provinces where the project was conducted.