Treatment of Refractory Ischemic Priapism: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Recurrent priapism is a rare and poorly known entity. It is defined by recurrent episodes of painful erections that last less than four hours. The etiology is similar to that of ischemic priapism. Episodes lasting more than four hours require immediate intervention to prevent penile fibrosis and subsequent erectile dysfunction. A 42-year-old male with no significant chronic-degenerative history was referred to our medical center from his second-level medical unit after a 56-hour history of ischemic priapism with the persistence of tumescence despite medical and surgical treatment. Upon interrogation, the patient reported stuttering (recurrent) episodes of painful erections lasting approximately three to four hours, not associated with sexual activity or arousal, in the past two years, with spontaneous resolution. He denied the use of psychotropics or drugs for erectile dysfunction. As a palliative measure, a left saphenous-cavernous (Grayhack) bypass was performed, with a 90% decrease in tumescence and total resolution of pain during the first 12 hours. There is little information and treatment recommendations for patients with recurrent priapism, and even less for patients who are refractory to conventional medical and surgical treatment. Recurrent or stuttering priapism is a condition with a low incidence and a pathophysiology compatible with low-flow priapism. It is difficult to treat and has a poor prognosis in terms of erectile function. Likewise, it is mostly associated with the use of psychotropic drugs such as cocaine and marijuana, medications for erectile dysfunction such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors, prostaglandin E1 analogues, and hematological malignancies such as sickle cell anemia and multiple myeloma. The aim of this article is to share our experience with a patient refractory to multiple medical and surgical treatments.

[Urology training in Mexico: Residents' perspective]. / Entrenamiento de urología en México: Perspectiva del residente.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and identify from the resident's perspective the current state of the urology residency training in the surgical, research, affective domain and its working future. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed an anonymous survey of 98 urology residents during 2014. The survey included 62 questions and assesses the surgical, the clinical research, and the affective domain, and also its working future. RESULTS: We reviewed a total of 98 surveys, average age 29 years, 92% men and 8% women. The scholarship average was 12,000-14,000 pesos. Most of them have had at least one research work in a national congress, but not in an international one. Less than 10% has published papers in PubMed, although most consider clinical research as mandatory in their urology training programs. Most residents consider their training in laparoscopy to be inadequate, but they consider the relationship between partners and teachers is adequate and most of them are satisfied with their program.

Multilocular Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma or Cystic Nephroma?

The incidence of Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma (MCRCC) in literature is very low and confounding MCRCC with cystic nephroma (CN) is even more unusual. The aim of this report is to present a case of MCRCC and emphasize the importance of the preoperative radiologic evaluation and immunohistochemical staining confirmation to obtain an accurate diagnosis. A 73-year-old woman presented with a history of 4-month right flank pain. CT showed a Bosniak type III renal mass. After laparoscopic partial nephrectomy the initial report was cystic nephroma. Immunohistochemical staining was performed being positive for Epithelial Membrane Antigen thus changing the diagnosis to MCRCC. Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma cannot reliably be distinguished from cystic nephroma neither by physical examination nor by radiologic evaluation; immunohistochemical staining assay is useful to differentiate between these conditions allowing an accurate diagnosis and proper follow-up.