RESUMO
Affective computing has an unprecedented potential to change the way humans interact with technology. While the last decades have witnessed vast progress in the field, multimodal affective computing systems are generally black box by design. As affective systems start to be deployed in real-world scenarios, such as education or healthcare, a shift of focus toward improved transparency and interpretability is needed. In this context, how do we explain the output of affective computing models? and how to do so without limiting predictive performance? In this article, we review affective computing work from an explainable AI (XAI) perspective, collecting and synthesizing relevant papers into three major XAI approaches: premodel (applied before training), in-model (applied during training), and postmodel (applied after training). We present and discuss the most fundamental challenges in the field, namely, how to relate explanations back to multimodal and time-dependent data, how to integrate context and inductive biases into explanations using mechanisms such as attention, generative modeling, or graph-based methods, and how to capture intramodal and cross-modal interactions in post hoc explanations. While explainable affective computing is still nascent, existing methods are promising, contributing not only toward improved transparency but, in many cases, surpassing state-of-the-art results. Based on these findings, we explore directions for future research and discuss the importance of data-driven XAI and explanation goals, and explainee needs definition, as well as causability or the extent to which a given method leads to human understanding.
