RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine if laparoscopic excision is more effective than open excision in the treatment of choledochal cysts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials in 3 databases measuring the efficacy of laparoscopic and open excision of choledochal cysts was performed. The authors considered international and national reports, whose results were analyzed in detail. RESULTS: Mean duration of laparoscopic excision was 51 min, open excision - 35.4 min. Length of hospital-stay after laparoscopic excision ranged between 5 and 74 days, after open excision - between 7 and 146 days. Bile leakage rate was 1-2% and 4%, respectively. Laparoscopic excision was followed by lower complication rate. Morbidity and mortality in laparoscopic excision was 20% and 0%, in open excision - 60% and 3.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic excision is more effective than open excision in the treatment of choledochal cysts.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar , Cisto do Colédoco , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Cisto do Colédoco/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Biliar/métodosRESUMO
Meckel's diverticulum is the most common congenital defect of the gastrointestinal tract. It is most often silent or asymptomatic. However, acute abdominal signs of obstruction, inflammation, hemorrhage and perforation are possible in other cases. Different foreign bodies can cause perforation of Meckel's diverticulum. We present an 18-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain within 48 previous hours. After evaluation, acute appendicitis was diagnosed and he underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Meckel's diverticulum perforated by a fish bone was intraoperatively discovered. Incidental appendectomy and segmental resection of the ileum were performed.