Fetal MAVS and type I IFN signaling pathways control ZIKV infection in the placenta and maternal decidua.

The contribution of placental immune responses to congenital Zika virus (ZIKV) syndrome remains poorly understood. Here, we leveraged a mouse model of ZIKV infection to identify mechanisms of innate immune restriction exclusively in the fetal compartment of the placenta. ZIKV principally infected mononuclear trophoblasts in the junctional zone, which was limited by mitochondrial antiviral-signaling protein (MAVS) and type I interferon (IFN) signaling mechanisms. Single nuclear RNA sequencing revealed MAVS-dependent expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) in spongiotrophoblasts but not in other placental cells that use alternate pathways to induce ISGs. ZIKV infection of Ifnar1-/- or Mavs-/- placentas was associated with greater infection of the adjacent immunocompetent decidua, and heterozygous Mavs+/- or Ifnar1+/- dams carrying immunodeficient fetuses sustained greater maternal viremia and tissue infection than dams carrying wild-type fetuses. Thus, MAVS-IFN signaling in the fetus restricts ZIKV infection in junctional zone trophoblasts, which modulates dissemination and outcome for both the fetus and the pregnant mother.

Satisfaction with new patient telehealth visits for reproductive endocrinology patients in the era of COVID-19.

PURPOSE: To study patient satisfaction with new patient telehealth visits in a reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) office. METHODS: A cross-sectional study in a university-based fertility clinic was completed including all new patients seen via telehealth between March 1, 2021, and August 19, 2021. Primary outcomes were perceived patient satisfaction, access, and preferences to telehealth visits. RESULTS: A total of 351 participants were contacted, 61.8% (n = 217) agreed to participate in the study, and 28.8% (n = 101) completed the survey. There were no significant differences in age, BMI, distance from clinic, or length of infertility with response to survey. Ninety-three percent of responders would use telehealth services again and were satisfied with the telehealth system. Telehealth improved access to healthcare for 88% and travel time for 96%. The median distance from clinic was 24 miles, and there was no significance difference in preference for telehealth visits over in person visits (p = 0.696). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of COVID-19, healthcare implementation has dramatically changed with a drastic increase in telehealth services. Based on our survey, majority of patients were satisfied with telehealth visits and believed it saved travel time while improving access to REI care. Despite no differences in patient preference for in person versus telehealth depending on their distance from clinic, this is reassuring because patients are satisfied with telehealth for reasons other than distance from clinic.