Performance of the Dreem 2 EEG headband, relative to polysomnography, for assessing sleep in Parkinson's disease.

GOAL AND AIMS: To pilot the feasibility and evaluate the performance of an EEG wearable for measuring sleep in individuals with Parkinson's disease. FOCUS TECHNOLOGY: Dreem Headband, Version 2. REFERENCE TECHNOLOGY: Polysomnography. SAMPLE: Ten individuals with Parkinson's disease. DESIGN: Individuals wore Dreem Headband during a single night of polysomnography. CORE ANALYTICS: Comparison of summary metrics, bias, and epoch-by-epoch analysis. ADDITIONAL ANALYTICS AND EXPLORATORY ANALYSES: Correlation of summary metrics with demographic and Parkinson's disease characteristics. CORE OUTCOMES: Summary statistics showed Dreem Headband overestimated several sleep metrics, including total sleep, efficiency, deep sleep, and rapid eye movement sleep, with an exception in light sleep. Epoch-by-epoch analysis showed greater specificity than sensitivity, with adequate accuracy across sleep stages (0.55-0.82). IMPORTANT SUPPLEMENTAL OUTCOMES: Greater Parkinson's disease duration and rapid eye movement behavior were associated with more wakefulness, and worse Parkinson's disease motor symptoms were associated with less deep sleep. CORE CONCLUSION: The Dreem Headband performs similarly in Parkinson's disease as it did in non-Parkinson's disease samples and shows promise for improving access to sleep assessment in people with Parkinson's disease.

Conversion of L-dopa to Extended Release L-dopa (Rytary®) in Patients with Fluctuating Parkinson's Disease: Predictors of Dose.

BACKGROUND: A new extended release levodopa capsule (C/L ERC), Rytary®, has demonstrated improved "on" time in fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients, compared to optimally dosed immediate release levodopa. The milligram dosing, however, differs markedly and no empiric ratio or formula for dose conversion currently exists. OBJECTIVE: To determine the most effective conversion strategy from C/L to C/L ERC. METHODS: We reviewed fluctuating PD patients with problematic "off" time who were converted to C/L ERC using a semi-structured dose titration schedule, and collected data regarding basic efficacy, tolerability, and dosing, in order to determine an empirically based dose conversion formula. We collected demographics, PD historic data, and other medication use. RESULTS: Eighty fluctuating PD patients were given C/L ERC samples, 68 took at least one dose [46 male (67.6%), age 66.6±10.3 y], and 62 had adequate data for dose convergence calculations. At a mean follow-up of 119±101 days, [Range: 24-355 days], 43/68 (63.3%) remained on C/L ERC. CGI-I of "much improved" or "very much improved" was reported by 27/62 (43.5%) and dyskinesia scores from the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale item 4.1, (0-4 range)) tended to improve from 0.9±1.1 to 0.5±0.6, P = 0.08. The mean individual daily ratio was 2.0±0.6 : 1, [range 1.0-3.5]. A lower number of baseline daily L-dopa doses predicted a higher conversion ratio, but pre-conversion dyskinesia did not. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study found that C/L ERC was generally well tolerated and preferred by many patients. The mean total daily conversion ratio is 2 : 1.