Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
1.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 2024 Apr 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662124

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Physical activity has a key role in the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Community pharmacists are an accessible source to provide brief advice to people on how to be more physically active. Nonetheless, there is a limited understanding of stakeholders' perspectives on their role in promoting physical activity, to inform policy and practice. The present study addresses this gap. AIM: To determine consensus from different health professionals on the role of pharmacists and pharmacies in brief physical activity counselling in Portugal. METHOD: This cross-sectional study used a two-round e-Delphi panel. The questionnaire was organised into four domains of physical activity promotion and comprised 37 items. Interdisciplinary experts rated their level of agreement using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was set at the outset as 75% or more of participants scoring 4 or 5 (consensus "in") or 1 or 2 (consensus "out"). RESULTS: Forty-two health professionals involved in promoting physical activity in the ambulatory setting in Portugal were selected through purposive quota sampling. Eighteen out of 37 items were consensual in the first round and five more achieved consensus after the second round (62.2%). Physical activity promotion was seen as the role of all healthcare workforce and pharmacies were considered as suitable spaces for service provision, regardless of remuneration. CONCLUSION: This study endorses a set of roles for physical activity promotion in community pharmacy from an interdisciplinary perspective. Consensually established perspectives can inform policy making and practice, streamlining the coordination of pharmacies with the national health service.

2.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1001, 2024 Apr 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600540

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evidence has shown that the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is much higher in prisons than in the community. The release of the COVID-19 vaccine and the recommendation by WHO to include prisons among priority settings have led to the inclusion of prisons in national COVID-19 vaccination strategies. Evidence on prison health and healthcare services provision is limited and often focuses on a single country or institution due to the multiple challenges of conducting research in prison settings. The present study was done in the framework of the EU-founded project RISE-Vac. It aimed to analyse the best practices and challenges applied in implementing COVID-19 universal vaccination services during the pandemic to support future expansion of routine life course vaccination services for people living in prison (PLP). METHODS: Two online cross-sectional surveys were designed and piloted: survey1 on prison characteristics and (non-COVID-19) immunisation practices; survey2 on the implementation and coverage of COVID-19 vaccination with open-ended questions for thematic analysis. Each RISE-Vac project partner distributed the questionnaire to one or two prisons in their country. Answers were collected from eight European prisons' directors or medical directors between November 2021-May 2022. RESULTS: According to our findings, the implementation modalities of COVID-19 vaccination services in the surveyed prisons were effective in improving PLP vaccination coverage. Strategies for optimal management of the vaccination campaign included: periodic time slot for PLP vaccination; new staff recruitment and task shifting; distribution of informational material both to PLP and prison staff. Key challenges included continuity of care after release, immunisation information system, and vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study describing the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination services in European prisons, suggesting that the expansion of vaccination provision in prison is possible. There is no unique solution that will fit every country but commonalities likely to be important in the design and implementation of future vaccination campaigns targeting PLP emerged. Increased availability of vaccination services in prison is not only possible, but feasible and highly desirable, and can contribute to the reduction of health inequalities.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Prisioneiros , Humanos , Prisões , Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Acontecimentos que Mudam a Vida , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
3.
J Pharm Policy Pract ; 17(1): 2296551, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38250517

RESUMO

Background: Monotherapy with aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant were the standard-of-care for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-type2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer, before integration of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Effectiveness data is essential for regulatory action, but little is known about real-world use of aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted resorting to data from a cancer registry to identify adult women with HR+/HER- advanced breast cancer exposed to aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant (31 May 2017-31 March 2019) at the main oncology hospital in Portugal. Cases were updated with follow-up until death or cut-off (31 March 2021) and pseudoanonymized data extracted. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary time to treatment failure (TTF), estimated using survival analysis and compared with published trials. Results: 192 patients were distributed by subgroups according to the medicine. Letrozole: OS 30.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 20.6-41.4); TTF 11.2 (95%CI 8.7-13.7). Exemestane: OS 22.1 (95%CI 9.7-34.6); TTF 6.0 (95%CI 4.1-7.8). Fulvestrant: OS 21.6 (95%CI 16.5-26.7); TTF 5.6 (95%CI 4.5-6.6). Conclusions: Estimated effectiveness (OS) of letrozole and fulvestrant was, respectively, 3.2-3.5 months lower than reported. The clinical meaning seems uncertain and may be explained a higher proportion of worse prognostic characteristics in patients treated in the real-world.

5.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 43(4): 1139-1148, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34218402

RESUMO

One year since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid response measures have been implemented internationally to mitigate the spread of the virus. Following rapid and successful pre-clinical and human trials, several vaccines have been authorised for use across Europe through the European Medicines Agency and national regulatory authorities. Clinical trials have shown promising results including important reductions in disease severity, hospitalisation and mortality. In order to maximise the public health benefit of available vaccines, there is a pressing need to vaccinate a large proportion of the population. Internationally, this has prompted coordination of existing services at enormous scale, and development and implementation of novel vaccination strategies to ensure maximum inoculation over the shortest possible timeframe. Pharmacists are being promoted as healthcare professionals that enhance roll-out of COVID-19 vaccination programmes. This paper aims to summarise current policy and practice in relation to pharmacists' involvement in COVID-19 vaccination in 13 countries across Europe.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/uso terapêutico , Política de Saúde , Farmacêuticos , Papel Profissional , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática dos Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Padrões de Prática dos Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos
6.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 43(3): 439-440, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34121157
7.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 43(3): 629-636, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33104948

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although much is known about cardiovascular patients' medication adherence, the extent to which clinicians perceive non-adherence as a barrier in clinical practice is little explored. Objective To evaluate knowledge and awareness about potential barriers to medication adherence, and to evaluate strategies used in clinical practice by Portuguese clinicians on how to foster medication adherence of patients undergoing secondary cardiovascular prevention. Setting Nominal Group Technique (NGT) at the University of Lisbon; online survey addressed to physicians working in primary and secondary care in Portugal. Method A narrative literature review was conducted in Pubmed to identify studies describing interventions targeted at physicians to manage medication adherence. The NGT included 12 allied healthcare professionals with recognized expertise in medication adherence and was organised in four phases, resulting in survey development. The survey was used in a cross-sectional national study where clinicians reported their knowledge and perceptions about patients' medication adherence and their daily practice. Main outcome measures Knowledge and awareness about barriers to medication adherence; and practice patterns. Results A total of 296 papers were identified, 26 of which were included. Four main topics were selected to be used in the NGT: adherence determinants, detecting non-adherence, fostering adherence, and educating physicians. NGT resulted in a survey, reaching 451 physicians, mostly practicing in primary care. Most had specific education on medication adherence and considered patient interviews and prescription records the most useful assessment methods. Nonetheless, many recognised often using clinical judgement to evaluate adherence in practice. Barriers to medication adherence were perceived to occur often during implementation. Most perceived reasons for uncontrolled hypertension were non-adherence to lifestyle recommendations and to medication. Less than half the physicians asked their patients if medication was taken. More useful enabling strategies included reducing daily doses, reviewing therapeutic options and motivational interventions. Conclusions Clinicians seem well informed about the importance of medication adherence and aware of problems encountered in practice. Limited time during medical appointment may be a barrier for better patient support.


Assuntos
Hipertensão , Médicos , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação , Portugal/epidemiologia
8.
Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) ; 18(3): 0-0, jul.-sept. 2020. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-194192

RESUMO

The central role of the Portuguese National Health Service (P-NHS) guarantees virtually free universal coverage. Key policy papers, such as the National Health Plan and the National Plan for Patient Safety have implications for pharmacists, including an engagement in medicines reconciliation. These primary health care reform, while not explicitly contemplating a role for pharmacists, offer opportunities for the involvement of primary care pharmacists in medicines management. Primary care pharmacists, who as employees of the P-NHS work closely with an interdisciplinary team, have launched a pilot service to manage polypharmacy in people living with multimorbidities, involving potential referral to community pharmacy. Full integration of community pharmacy into primary health care is challenging due to their nature as private providers, which implies the need for the recognition that public and private health sectors are mutually complementary and may maximize universal health coverage. The scope of practice of community pharmacies has been shifting to service provision, currently supported by law and in some cases, including the needle and syringe exchange program and generic substitution, remunerated. Key changes envisaged for the future of pharmacists and their integration in primary care comprise the development and establishment of clinical pharmacy as a specialization area, peer clinician recognition and better integration in primary care teams, including full access to clinical records. These key changes would enable pharmacists to apply their competence in medicines optimization for improved patient outcomes


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Política de Saúde , Farmácias/normas , Farmacêuticos/normas , Assistência Farmacêutica/normas , Farmácias/organização & administração , Portugal , Assistência Farmacêutica/organização & administração , Prática Profissional , Papel Profissional
9.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(10): 1295-1302, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32844487

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy is promising for lung cancer treatment, although at significant financial impact. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and the efficacy-effectiveness gap of pembrolizumab in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A population-based ambispective cohort study was conducted. Cases of interest were identified through the National Cancer Registry database and additional data sources. Patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with NSCLC and exposed to pembrolizumab, between 23 June 2016 and 31 October 2018, as second or later lines of treatment for advanced disease were included. Patients were followed-up until death or cut-off date (30 April 2019). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), and adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment discontinuation. The efficacy-effectiveness gap was evaluated comparing results with clinical trial data. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were included. Median age was 63 years (range 33-94); 74.6% were male. Median treatment duration was 5.6 months (interquartile range: 1.4-10.4) and, at cut-off date, treatment had been discontinued in 141 patients, mainly due to disease progression. Median OS was 13.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.3-15.9) and 1-year OS was 53.1% (95% CI 45.2%-60.3%). Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI 4.6-7.2), median EFS was 4.7 months (95% CI 3.2-6.0), and treatment was discontinued due to AE in 8.3% of cases (n = 15). The efficacy-effectiveness gap seems to favor pembrolizumab use in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Real-world data suggest the performance of pembrolizumab to reflect the clinical trial outcomes in previously treated NSCLC.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 49(4): 606-617, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31782043

RESUMO

Atrial fibrillation (AF) accounts for up to one third of strokes, one of the lead mortality causes worldwide. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend opportunistic screening as a means to increase the odds of early detection and institution of appropriate treatment according to risk factors identified. However, in most countries there are various barriers to effective uptake of screening, including low awareness. The Atrial Fibrillation Association is a patient association engaged with raising awareness of AF. Establishing a partnership with the International Pharmacists for Anticoagulation Care Taskforce, we set as goals to test a model for raising awareness of AF involving pharmacists globally; and to identify barriers and enablers to its implementation. A cross-sectional study was conducted during the Arrhythmia Alliance World Heart Rhythm Week. Pharmacists from 10 countries invited individuals (≥ 40 years; without anticoagulation therapy of AF) to participate in the awareness campaign. Participants agreeing were engaged in the early detection of AF (EDAF) using pulse palpation. Individuals with rhythm discrepancies were referred and prospectively assessed to have information on the proportion of confirmed diagnosis, leading to estimate the detection rate. Interviews with country coordinators explored barriers and enablers to implementation. The study involved 4193 participants in the awareness campaign and 2762 in the EDAF event (mean age 65.3 ± 13.0), of whom 46.2% individuals were asymptomatic, recruited across 120 sites. Most common CHA2DS2-VASc risk factor was hypertension. Among 161 patients referred to physician, feedback was obtained for 32 cases, of whom 12 new arrhythmia diagnoses were confirmed (5 for AF, 2 for atrial flutter), all among elders (≥ 65 years). Qualitative evaluation suggested a local champion to enable pharmacists' success; technology enhanced engagement amongst patients and increased pharmacists' confidence in referring to physicians; interprofessional relationship was crucial in success. This study suggests pharmacists can contribute to greater outreach of awareness campaigns. Effective communication pathways for inter-professional collaboration were suggested enablers to gain full benefits of EDAF.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Educação em Saúde/métodos , Farmacêuticos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Diagnóstico Precoce , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
12.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 40(4): 852-861, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29860707

RESUMO

Background Toxicity of oncology treatments in real-life patients is frequently disregarded and hence underreported. Objective To characterize adverse events (AEs) of immunotherapy and targeted therapy reported in patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. Setting District Hospital for Cancer treatment (Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil). Method A retrospective cohort of melanoma patients was established, comprising adult patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Exposure was characterized by nature, time and intensity of exposure. To account for different exposure periods, person-time was used as unit of analysis. Main outcomes measure Occurrence of AEs. Results Data from 111 patients included in the cohort indicates the majority received immunotherapy regimens (CTLA-4, anti-PD-1 and combination therapy; (n = 70; 63.1%), among which anti-PD-1 were the predominant treatment. Pembrolizumab was the most frequently prescribed drug (n = 30; 45.7%). Three hundred and seventy-one AEs were extracted. The incidence of AEs was lower in the anti-PD-1 mAc group (54 AEs per 1000 person.months) and the number of AEs/patient was also lower (3.1 ± 2.0). Grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in 15.3% (n = 17) of the cohort, being more common in the targeted therapy group. Forty-two (11.6%) of the extracted AEs were not described in the Summary of Product Characteristics of the drugs under study. Conclusion This study suggests various known and unknown AEs of immunotherapy and targeted therapy may be identified using the Cancer Registry database. These events should be considered as signals worth further investigation for assessment of causality as the underreporting of AEs in cancer may have potential implications for the patient's quality of life.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Imunoterapia/efeitos adversos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Mineração de Dados/métodos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança do Paciente , Portugal/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
14.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 39(6): 1282-1290, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29139019

RESUMO

Background Guidelines on the management of orally anticoagulated patients are continuously evolving, leading to an increased need for pharmacists to be fully integrated in care provision. Objective To identify self-reported gaps in confidence among practicing pharmacists in the area of anticoagulation. Setting Pharmacists in different work settings in different countries. Method Cross-sectional international survey from October 2015 till November 2016 among pharmacists working in different settings to assess their level of confidence when delivering anticoagulants as well as to identify possible educational needs regarding this medication class. Validation of the survey was ensured. Results Responses from 4212 pharmacists originating from 18 countries were obtained. Pharmacists' level of confidence was significantly higher (p < 0.001) when advising patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) versus non-vitamin K antagonists (NOACs). In general, hospital pharmacists displayed higher confidence levels compared to community pharmacists when advising patients on anticoagulation (p < 0.001). Two distinct patterns of confidence levels emerged relating to basic and advanced pharmaceutical care. Confidence levels when providing advanced pharmaceutical care were significantly higher for Oceania and lower for South America (p < 0.005). Conclusions Pharmacists felt more confident in supporting patients receiving VKAs compared to the more recently introduced NOACs. With the increasing use of NOACs and the risks pertaining to anticoagulation therapy, it is essential to invest in education for pharmacists to address their knowledge gaps enabling them to confidently support patients receiving oral anticoagulants.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Farmacêuticos/psicologia , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
15.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 39(6): 1273-1281, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28875370

RESUMO

Background The New Medicines Service (NMS) was implemented in the United Kingdom in 2011 and first evaluated in 2014, showing 10% increase on adherence. Objective To assess community pharmacists' current practice, knowledge and confidence in supporting patients' adherence as part of the NMS for patients on Oral Anti-Coagulants (OACs) for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation. Setting Community pharmacists in London. Method An online cross-sectional survey was sent to pharmacists from their Local Pharmaceutical Committees and advertised by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Analysis was undertaken in SPSs v23 considering a confidence level of 95%. Main outcome measures pharmacists reported confidence of providing the NMS on OACs; training needs and skills for supporting adherence. Results A total of 257 valid responses were analysed (6.8% response rate; {Cronbach's α = 0.676-0.892}). Data indicates that over a 2-month period, 25% of pharmacists had completed ≥6 NMS consultations for all OACs, of which 11% for new oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The key priorities in counselling items during the NMS consultation were to discuss actions to take when bleeding occurs, followed by supporting adherence. Pharmacists were more confident in their knowledge, skills and access to resources for Vitamin-K Antagonists (VKAs) than for NOACs (p < 0.005). Results also highlight pharmacists' unfamiliarity with alert cards, lower for NOACs than VKAs (p < 0.001), albeit perceived as critically important. Half the sample mentioned to use the British National Formulary as information resource. Conclusion Results suggest the provision of NMS for NOACs is low. Supporting pharmacists with tailored education and adherence support might foster dissemination.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Adesão à Medicação , Farmacêuticos/psicologia , Administração Oral , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
16.
Farm. comunitarios (Internet) ; 9(1): 28-33, mar. 2017. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-161765

RESUMO

Introducción: Las caídas son frecuentes entre los ancianos, los cuales toman muchos medicamentos y algunos de ellos, como los psicofármacos, pueden aumentar el riesgo de caídas. Objetivos: Investigar la relación entre el uso de psicofármacos y la aparición de caídas en pacientes ancianos institucionalizados e identificar los fármacos más utilizados en estos pacientes. Además, se estudió el riesgo asociado al número de psicofármacos que el paciente estaba tomando y el riesgo de caídas que provocaron. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio caso-control anidado a partir de una cohorte de pacientes polimedicados internados en una residencia. Los casos fueron pacientes con caídas, entre agosto de 2014 y diciembre de 2015, y los controles aquellos que no cayeron. La exposición a psicofármacos fue investigada en los 2 grupos retrospectivamente. La información fue recogida de la base de datos de la residencia por personal sanitario. El análisis se centró en las OR de caídas por grupo terapéutico, usando un IC de 95%. Resultados: Se analizó una muestra de 22 pacientes, 9 casos y 13 controles: mayoría mujeres, y edad media 82,3 años (DE=6,5). Cada residente tomó una media de 11 medicamentos (DE=4,6). El grupo farmacoterapéutico y el fármaco más utilizados fueron antipsicóticos y quetiapina (59,1%, n=13; 45,5%, n=10, respectivamente). Los OR calculados demuestran no haber ninguna asociación estadísticamente significativa entre los subgrupos terapéuticos y/o fármacos con un elevado riesgo de caídas (p. ej. quetiapina: OR=4.5; IC=0,730-27,739; antipsicóticos atípicos: OR=3,2; IC=0,540-18,980). Conclusión: Como los resultados fueron obtenidos de una muestra limitada, no se demostraron relaciones significativas, aunque sí una clara relación entre el uso de psicofármacos y el riesgo de caídas, identificando aquellos grupos farmacoterapéuticos más influyentes en caídas (AU)


Introduction: Falls are frequent in the elderly, because they take medication that may increase the risk of falls, including psychotropic drugs. Aims: To explore the relationship between the use of psychotropic drugs and the occurrence of falls in institutionalized patients, and to identify the most used drugs in these patients. In addition, it was studied the risk associated with the psychotropic drugs and the risk of falls that they caused. Methods: A nested case-control study was performed from a cohort of polypharmacy patients residing in a nursing home. Cases were those having suffered a fall from August 2014 to December 2015, and controls were those without falls recorded. The exposure of psychoactive drugs was explored retrospectively in both groups. Information was collected in the database of the nursing home. Analysis focused on the odds ratio of falling per pharmacotherapy group, using confidence intervals set at 95%. Results: A sample of 22 patients, 9 cases and 13 controls, was analyzed: most patients were women, and the mean age was 82.3 years (SD=6.45). Residents used a mean of 11 medicines (SD=4.64). The most used pharmaceutical group and drug respectively were antipsychotics and quetiapine (59.1%, n=13; 45.5%, n=10). The OR determined in this study did not evidence any statistically significant association between the pharmacotherapeutic subgroups and/or drugs and increased risk of falling (quetiapine: OR=4.5; IC=0.730-27.739; atypical antipsychotics: OR=3.2; IC=0.540-18.980). Conclusion: Results were obtained in a restricted sample, leading to the incapacity of demonstrating significant associations. However, a trend between the use of psychotropic drugs and the risk of falls in the elderly was shown, identifying the most influential pharmacotherapeutic groups in falls (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicotrópicos/efeitos adversos , Saúde do Idoso Institucionalizado , Fatores de Risco , Farmacoepidemiologia/métodos , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles
17.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 39(1): 104-112, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27933488

RESUMO

Background In view of the current financial and demographic situation in Portugal, accessibility to health care may be affected, including the ability to adhere to medication. Objective To evaluate the perceived effects of the crisis on elderly patient's access to medicines and medical care, and its implications on medicine-taking behaviour. Setting Community pharmacy. Method A cross-sectional study was undertaken during April 2013, where elderly patients answered a self-administered questionnaire based on their health-related experiences in the current and previous year. Binary logistic regression was used to ascertain the effects of potential predictors on the likelihood of adherence. Main outcome measures self-reported adherence. Results A total of 1231 questionnaires were collected. 27.3% of patients had stopped using treatments or health services in the previous year for financial motives; mostly private medical appointments, followed by dentist appointments. Almost 30% of patients stopped purchasing prescribed medicines. Over 20% of patients reduced their use of public services. Out-of-pocket expenses with medicines were considered higher in the current year by 40.1% of patients. The most common strategy developed to cope with increasing costs of medicines was generic substitution, but around 15% of patients also stopped taking their medication or started saving by increasing the interdose interval. Conclusion Reports of decreasing costs with medicines was associated with a decreased likelihood of adherence (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.27-0.65). Lower perceived health status and having 3 or more co-morbidities were associated with lower odds of adhering, whilst less frequent medical appointments was associated with a higher likelihood of exhibiting adherence.


Assuntos
Recessão Econômica/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/economia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Adesão à Medicação , Percepção , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Portugal/epidemiologia
18.
Drugs Real World Outcomes ; 3(1): 89-97, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27747806

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Currently, people live longer but often with poor quality of life. The decrease in healthy life-years is partly attributable to the institution of polypharmacy to treat various comorbidities. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to determine the prevalence and nature of drug-related problems (DRPs) in polypharmacy elderly patients residing in nursing homes and to test the acceptability of a pharmacist's intervention. METHODS: An exposure cohort was constituted in three Portuguese nursing homes, where all polypharmacy (five or more medicines) elderly patients (≥65 years of age) were analysed and then a random stratified sample was extracted to be subject to an intervention. Clinical and therapeutic data were collected and analysed for DRPs and classified according to the II Granada Consensus, by a pharmacist-led team. The intervention was the formulation of a pharmacist's recommendations to prescribers addressing clinically relevant DRPs, along with suggestions for therapy changes. RESULTS: The initial sample included 126 elderly patients taking 1332 medicines, where 2109 DRPs were identified. The exposure cohort included 63 patients, with comparable baseline data (p > 0.005). Manifest DRPs occurred in 31.7 % of the intervention group (mainly quantitative ineffectiveness-DRP 4), whereas potential DRPs were identified in 100 % of patients (mainly non-quantitative unsafe-DRP 5). Amongst the DRPs identified, 584 (56.7 %) were reported to prescribers (all types of DRPs) and 113 (11 %) to nurses (only non-quantitative ineffectiveness-DRP 3). A total of 539 pharmacist recommendations were presented to physicians, corresponding to 62 letters sent by mail, each including an average of 8.7 recommendations to solve DRPs present in intervention group (IG) patients. There was a high non-response rate (n = 34 letters; 54.8 %; containing 367 pharmacist recommendations; 68.1 %) and amongst recommendations receiving feedback, only 8.7 % of pharmacist recommendations made were accepted (n = 15). Positive responses were significantly associated with a lower number of recommendations made, whereas a higher number of recommendations increased the odds of no response (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A pharmacist-led medication review proved useful in identifying DRPs in elderly polypharmacy nursing home residents. Stronger bonds must be developed between healthcare professionals to increase patient safety in the vulnerable institutionalised elderly population.

19.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 38(5): 1103-11, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27343120

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Background Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are often found in high proportion among the elderly population. The STOPP criteria have been suggested to detect more PIMs in European elderly than the Beers criteria. Objective This study aimed to determine the prevalence of PIMs and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) in a sample of Portuguese nursing homes residents. Setting Four elderly facilities in mainland Portugal Method A descriptive cross-sectional study was used. Elderly polypharmacy patients were included in the study and their medication (registered in patient clinical records) analysed using the Beers (2012 original version and 2008 version adapted to Portugal), STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions) and START (Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment) criteria. Data were analysed using univariate and bivariate descriptive statistics, considering a confidence interval of 95 %. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of PIMs and PPOs. Results The sample included 161 individuals, with a mean age of 84.7 years (SD = 6.35), 68.9 % being female. A total of 807 PIMs and 90 PPOs were identified through the application of the three set of criteria. The prevalence of PIMs using the most recent version of the Beers criteria was 85.1 and 42.1 % for independent and dependent of diagnosis, respectively. The Portuguese adaptation of this same tool indicated a lower prevalence of PIMs, 60.3 and 16.7 %, respectively. The prevalence of PIMs using the STOPP criteria was 75.4 %, whilst the prevalence of PPOs, using START, was 42.9 %. There were significant differences in the mean number of PIMs detected depending on the tool used. (p < 0.001). Conclusions The application of the studied criteria in an elderly sample enabled the identification of a notable amount of PIMs and PPOs, indicating there is room for improving the quality of care. The variation in prevalence indicates careful choice of the tool is a prerequisite for engaging in medication review. Using START/STOPP criteria enabled a more holistic approach to the quality of prescribing in the elderly, highlighting low levels of cardiovascular risk prevention and abuse of psychotropic drugs, aside with system failures largely preventable by electronic prescribing and alert generation.


Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/normas , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/normas , Prescrição Inadequada/efeitos adversos , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Casas de Saúde/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Portugal/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
20.
Pharm. pract. (Granada, Internet) ; 14(1): 0-0, ene.-mar. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-150373

RESUMO

Background: Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a widely used therapeutic group in the world, and particularly in the Portuguese population. Objective: To compare NSAID’s use by prescription and self-medication acquisition and to determine the pattern of indication of NSAIDs, their usage profile and possible implications for patients’ safety. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used where individuals presenting at a community pharmacy requesting NSAIDs during the study period (one month) were invited to answer a face-to-face interview where socio-demographic characteristics, the indication pattern and previous experience of side effects were assessed. A follow-up interview was performed one week later to assess the incidence of adverse effects. The study was ethically approved. Results: A sample of 130 NSAIDs users was recruited, comprising mostly women (n=87; 66.9%), actively employed (n=77; 59.2%) and presenting a mean age of 49.5 years old (SD=20.49). An equal proportion of individuals acquired NSAIDs by self-medication and with medical prescription (n=65; 50%). Over 4/5 of patients (n=57; 87.7%) acquiring NSAIDs without a prescription were self-medicated by their own initiative, and only 10.8% (n=7) had been advised by the pharmacist. The most commonly acquired active substances were ibuprofen and diclofenac. Self-medicated users more frequently resorted to topical NSAIDs following short term treatments. The major underlying condition motivating NSAIDs sought were musculoskeletal disorders (45.0%), regardless of the regimen. An important proportion of prevalent users of NSAIDs reported previous experience of adverse effects (11.3%). One week after initiating NSAID therapy, a small proportion of patients reported incidence of adverse effects. Conclusion: Self-medication with NSAIDs is sought for numerous medical conditions. Reported adverse effects (prevalent and incident) confirm the need for a more rational use of NSAIDs and ongoing pharmacovigilance (AU)


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Automedicação/instrumentação , Automedicação/métodos , Automedicação , Farmácias/organização & administração , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/farmacologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/organização & administração , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Portugal/epidemiologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...